After rebirth, I became a great writer

Chapter 341: Only one of the two conclusions!

When he heard Chen Tianhong say that Jin Zhongrui's prediction was correct, he felt incredible, including Jin Zhongrui himself, and it was quite shocking, but logically you have to make sense, how could all the passengers be the murderer?

The old Russian lady is nearly eighty years old, and she can still carry a knife?

Mrs. Habat, who provided several important clues, was calling for catching the thief?

How could the female missionary with religious belief allow her to kill?

There is also the Italian who is obviously an innocent traveler.

After listening to Chen Tianhong's second sentence, they were even more confused. What the hell is it, what is it? You are in the early morning, it is already noon, where is the entertainment person at noon?

Do you know that for your "breaking" detective novel, we didn't sleep well all night last night, and we didn't eat breakfast today, and we even quarreled for nearly an hour.

Chen Tianhong shrugged when he saw this. Everyone's reaction was understandable. When he read this novel, he almost doubted his life. You must know that the movie he watched first, and the original novel was even more outrageous and shocking.

He said: "To borrow a sentence from the famous detective Poirot once said, if you come into contact with similar cases a few more times, you will find that they actually have one thing in common: everyone involved in the case has something to hide!"

Everyone heard the question mark. Has Poirot said this in the book?

Oh, I understand, you didn’t create Detective Poirot. This sentence is equivalent to what you said. Damn, pretending to be X, and even putting on a famous quote, but it’s a bit interesting.

Chen Tianhong didn't know that his words were misunderstood. The sentence he just said came from the classic quote from Grandma about Poirot, another detective novel.

"In fact, "The Murder of Orient Express" not only says that everyone who is interrogated has concealed something, it is that everything that happens on the train is a premeditated and purposeful dramatic murder, and all the evidence and all testimony are designed in advance. What each of them says is not the truth, and it can be understood that they are all doing perjury!"

"Everyone's testimony is false, premeditated, purposeful dramatic murder"

Everyone murmured and repeated, and when Chen Tianhong reminded him, the context of the case suddenly became clear. Some testimony in the fog was not very clear, and there were reasonable explanations, but there were still doubts. They needed more detailed logical arguments.

And there is also the biggest question: Since everyone is a murderer, why do you say "no"?

How can all this be explained?

Chen Tianhong kept a mysterious smile. Just as he was about to explain in detail, a "guru" sound rang out and his stomach protested.

"Let's have a meal first, let's talk while eating."

"no!"

Everyone refused decisively.

Chen Tianhong: ".",

He secretly regretted it. He just went to eat first, but he insisted on running over. Now that he was over, it was not possible to explain it for less than half an hour. In addition, the time would definitely be extended.

Fortunately, Kim Jung-rui knew how to take care of others, so he spoke.

"Tianhong, have you written the last part? So you send it to us and we will read it ourselves, and you will go to have a meal first."

"I've written it! I've copied it into the USB flash drive, and all the chapters are there, including the first chapter I wrote on the train, and I'll ask you to help print it out. Didn't the communication meeting say that it's paper?"

Chen Tianhong was very good at leveraging the rash. He was afraid that something would happen again, so he immediately took out the USB flash drive and handed it to Jin Zhongrui. He also arranged the printing matter and then slipped out of the room.

"This kid must be hungry! No matter him, Xiao Shu, please bring your computer."

Jin Zhongrui laughed and scolded, turned his head toward the toolman No. 2 Shu Xingkun.

Shu Xingkun also wants to have a meal, but it is most important to solve the mystery of "The Murder of Orient Express".

So he quickly moved his computer, inserted the USB flash drive, found the electronic script and opened it. Everyone gathered around instantly, and they wanted to read it together.

Poirot and his old friend director, the doctor met again in the private room. The director and the doctor argued with each other that they were dizzy by a lot of evidence in front of them, and the final conclusion was not much different from Jin Zhongrui's initial one.

According to the businessman secretary, the director said that his boss had an involvement with the mafia and believed that the murderer was foreign and a killer sent by the mafia.

The doctor believes that the murderer is among the passengers, and both of them have one thing in common, and the murderer has two.

But Poirot asked the two, can the assumptions of the two murderers really be valid?

The director and the doctor said, are there any other explanations?

Poirot said, everyone calmed down for a quarter of an hour and thought quietly.

After a quarter of an hour, the director and the doctor did not think of any other conclusions, but Poirot's eyebrows stretched out, as if he had an answer.

The original words in the book are [But, after all, why not? If that is the case - Well, if that is the case, everything can be explained.]

Next, Poirot argued the "explanation" he was logically reasoned, combined with the recorded testimony and clues, he told the directors and doctors about his analysis, and called out the key "suspects" among the passengers one by one, and conducted another investigation.

Jin Zhongrui and the others read the content of the second interrogation very carefully. Because they had the "answer" given by Chen Tianhong and looked at the case from the perspective of God's vision, they finally grasped the key point, which was the "Armstrong kidnapping case."

Before they reached the point, they couldn't help but give Poirot a sincere thumbs up for the clear logic of the clear logic.

Poirot first started to investigate by confirming the fact that had happened. The Oriental train was trapped in a snow pile in the middle of the night. After the parking was stopped, no one (including the murderer) could get off the bus and escape.

This means that even if an outsider commits the crime, the murderer cannot get out of the car. In order to cover up, he can only blame others and divert Poirot's sight. The so-called remaining clues on the scene, such as pocket watches, pipes, and women's red pajamas, may have been left deliberately by him.

The second explanation is that what the passengers do. The question is how many people are involved?

What's scary is that during the first interrogation, each of them had perfect evidence of absenteeism, and two other passengers and more proved it.

Then there are only two possibilities: the murderer is really an outsider, or all the passengers are committing perjury.

Then use reverse thinking to reverse. If there is no heavy snow stopping the train, the Eastern train arrives on time. The final outcome is that the conductor finds the merchant dead. The police get on the train to investigate. The evidence they know is the same as the superficial clues. Everyone will focus on the two foreign killers. The people on the train will never be implicated.

Thinking of this, Poirot had already noticed something was wrong. It was obvious that someone was deliberately guiding everyone to believe that the murderer was an outsider.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

"It's still an asymmetry of information. Although we guessed that the "Armstrong case" is an important clue, we subconsciously analyze the kidnapping case of the "pilot" in reality, but we cannot match it. We can only passively accept the various clues thrown by Hongwen, and cannot think like Poirot, so as to get the answer. This is a disguised hidden plot!"

The last sentence was said by Ye Feng. The meaning in his words was clearly "strange" Chen Tianhong, and he was actually praising him.

If the detective novel allows readers to easily analyze the results, it is a failure. The deeper it hides, the more shocking it will be when it is finally exposed.

Now is the best proof. Several of the top domestic detective writers discussed for a long time but failed to analyze the answer. It was only after Hongwen gave the final answer and followed the protagonist Poirot's reasoning that he suddenly understood!

This feeling is indescribable, you can only be amazed, admired, and amazed again.

The most frustrating one was Lu Huaiyi. He was still thinking about disgusting Chen Tianhong yesterday, but who knew that the backhand was a king bomb!

This is so unreasonable!

The day before yesterday, "The Disappearing Weapon" and "The Murder of the Orient Express" were simply written by two people. The gap is too big, one is underground and the other is in the sky.

At this point, this person can only pinch his nose and admit that Hongwen is really a tragedy!

Lu Huaiyi was about to grit his teeth and praise him, but suddenly he remembered that they hadn't finished reading it yet! The story still ended, and Hongwen's "no" has not yet come out.

So with his reminder, Ye Feng and the others temporarily put away their praises and turned to the last chapter, [Two conclusions!]

That night, Poirot invited all the passengers to the restaurant. These "murderers" sat around the table, and each had a mixed mood of expectation and fear on his face.

Poirot also stood up with a complicated expression. He broke his previous habit of reasoning cases and gave two conclusions.

To put it simply, the first conclusion: all the guesses here are right. The murderer is an outsider. He is a killer sent by the mafia. He pretended to be a train conductor and got on the train. After killing the merchant, he hid in Mrs. Habat's private room to deal with the murder weapon and clothes, and got off the train in time.

(Note: This is a case that occurs when the train arrives at the station, which means that the murder is earlier.)

Of course, there are many doubts about this conclusion, which is not so convincing, but it makes sense to be sloppy.

After listening to this conclusion, all the characters in the book were relieved, but soon everyone raised their hearts again.

Poirot continued, this time the classic saying begins, that is, when the murder cannot be blamed on someone in the car, it means that everyone is suspicious.

It is undeniable that the merchant escaped the verdict of the law and was guilty, and there was a system in which the court jury consisted of twelve people.

It happened that there were twelve passengers in the car, all of whom were victims of the Armstrong case. So did they form a trial team and sentence the merchants to death?

The murderer first used sleeping pills to make the merchant fall asleep, and then created a time for the crime. Then the twelve people walked into the room in turn, and each of them stabbed the merchant with a knife. This is the source of the twelve wounds of varying strength, and the reason why there is only one murder weapon.

However, there is another thing worth thinking about. If this inference is correct, of course everyone believes that this is correct. However, the suspect is thirteen people, and one person is not the murderer, but he planned the entire case.

In a sense, he is the real culprit, because the twelve people who entered the room could not be sure whose sword finally killed the merchant.

Of course, all participants are murderers and have crimes, but there are choices (that implies that someone can take the initiative to bear the greatest responsibility).

This is Poirot's second conclusion.

Perhaps everyone understood what Poirot meant, and the planner behind the scenes took the initiative to stand up. No one expected that Mrs. Habat, who was the most nervous, planned everything. Her real identity was Hamstrong's mother-in-law.

Everything she planned was exactly the same as Poirot's inference, and Mrs. Habat expressed her willingness to take responsibility with all her strength, and asked Poirot, the directors and others to give others a free life.

When they saw this, Jin Zhongrui and the others sighed and even began to sympathize with the murderer in the book.

The murderer's motive was already clear, which was to avenge the Armstrong family and kill a person with a heinous crime.

And to borrow the words of the director, these thirteen people belong to different classes, different countries, and have different ages and identities.

They had no relationship with each other, but they were all people around Armstrong.

Therefore, they are all murderers, all victims, and kind victims.

However, the story is not over yet. When everyone looks at the last part of the time, the climax finally comes.

Poirot looked at his old friend director and asked him what he thought.

The director cleared his throat and said, "The first inference you made is correct, and certainly correct."

And he suggested that when the police arrived, only the first conclusion was provided.

The doctor agreed and said that as for the medical evidence, one or two wonderful modifications could be made.

Finally Poirot said: "As the conclusions are already in front of you, I can be honored to give up."

How to describe this ending?

I think the brilliance of human nature is fully displayed at this time! We should pay our highest respects to Poirot, to the directors, doctors, and all the victims in the book!

ps: Finally finished! The logic should be clear. Don’t criticize if you don’t like it! I’m dizzy when I check the information, so I’m too busy to take care of it!

(End of this chapter)