Almighty Alchemist

After the release of the two chapters of the second part, it has aroused a lot of criticism.

For example, the protagonist can prove himself by showing magic, or the leader of the song and dance troupe is too blind.

But the fact is: if you are Hugh Iglesne and you fall into a song and dance troupe and face compensation claims from others, when you choose a violent warning, it usually only means two possibilities: either kill everyone. Either the whereabouts will be leaked by the people here.

Which outcome would you choose? I don't think anyone will choose the latter, but there may be a few who choose the former. It's a pity that Xiu Yiglaer is not a saint, but at least he won't be mad enough to kill people just because others ask him for high compensation.

To know that a person is wanted, usually the most basic characteristics of a person are mentioned: blond boy, single, and spells.

Hugh Iglesel has inevitably possessed the two factors of being single and a teenager, which makes him sure to enter the field of vision of the Legal Affairs Bureau when he is facing a nationwide arrest.

Play magic at this time? Kill the Quartet?

To further increase your suspicion?

I have to regretfully think that anyone who thinks that the protagonist should show his power after falling is not suitable for fleeing. It is seriously suspected that you will be found out who you are before you have walked a few steps.

In fact, I have all these explanations, all in the book, but not in these chapters, but in several later chapters. Including why Xiuyi can endure the blackmail from the leader.

It is important to know that one of the benefits of depositing manuscripts is that there are usually no obvious logical paradoxes, and many pits are eligible to be filled after digging. For the sake of quality, I have to edit an article seven or eight times, and it can be said that there will be no unreasonable plots.

Of course, I'm not interested in explaining the debate between saints and hypocrites like in LK, it's just a matter of opinion.

———————

To explain the second thing, when this book was created, it borrowed from the Thief in style, which I have never denied, and I even actively admitted it publicly.

But I have absolutely no interest in imitating anyone's storyline.

In my opinion, there are several categories of book writing, such as reference, imitation, and plagiarism.

Plagiarism does not need to be explained, it is a typical person who writes what you use, and for large sections of plagiarism, you can change your name and count it as your own. Generally speaking, when it comes to more than three hundred words, it can be considered as plagiarism. (personal opinion)

I will not do such a thing.

References vary. For example, I read a certain sentence in a certain book that was good, so I used it. In this sentence, I may have plagiarized, but it is only a sentence, which has nothing to do with the specific storyline. I would do such a thing, and I don't think there is anything wrong with it.

Imitation is different. Imitation includes stylistic imitation and story imitation. I think the former is a kind of exercise in writing techniques and a positioning of the style of the novel.

The latter is to change the soup without changing the medicine and still draw a gourd, which is only better than plagiarism. It is not worth scolding, nor is it worth learning.

So I will imitate other people's style, borrow a certain sentence or a certain sentence or paragraph that is more classic but does not interfere with the specific plot, but I will not plagiarize the content of other people's articles, nor will I imitate other people's stories, and write them out stroke by stroke.

Even though I imitated the thief in style, and even extracted some elements from the thief, but all the main plots and branch plots have nothing to do with the thief, which is for sure. You may feel that there is a blue crystal in the language and dialogue, but in the story... which part of the plot do you think is similar to the blue crystal so far? I didn't find out. I always think that the plot is Lan Jing's weakness, and the language style is his strength. I will learn his strengths, why should I learn what I think is my weakness?

And the saints I've seen. But the detective and the song and dance troupe did not come from the idea of ​​the saints.

Oh, by the way, I've only read the books of Lan Jing's The Thief and The Magic Apprentice, and I've only read the first half of the chapters for the little ones. I know Brother Bu and there's a song and dance troupe, but I don't know anything else.

Therefore, I think that the existence of the song and dance troupe in the conception of the second part is likely to be influenced subconsciously because of imitation, but the development of its subsequent story is completely impossible to have any similarities with these two books.

All the main storylines are still just my own ideas!

————————

After writing Tianfeng for more than a year, I realized one thing.

The feeling that the content of the novel brings to readers cannot be explained outside the book. All excuses can only be explained by the contents of the book.

All explanations outside the book are superfluous.

So this will be the only time I explain.

I will not explain any criticism in the future.

Of course, my explanation is not to let everyone not criticize, but to hope that everyone has confidence in fate.

Although Yuanyuan's novels are more exciting, they don't give up rationality. When you put forward what I think are very good opinions, I will definitely correct them immediately and express my thanks.

But this time, you need to watch to understand.