As a Lawyer, You Sent the Judge In?

Chapter 231 The evidence is complete! The number of additional people for prosecution is five!

Su Bai raised a question and determined that the evidence was insufficient and relevant evidence materials needed to be supplemented.

 The prosecution launched an investigation into the following evidence.

 First: A focused review of the three perpetrators: Xu Feng, Li Tao, and Zhang Manlei.

 Mainly ask him about what happened while he was under guard.

 The three of them must be very clear about this matter, but they are just unwilling to say it and have been unable to find out.

  Second: Find the surveillance video at the time to see what specifically happened during the surveillance.

 The third one is to look for physical evidence.

 Physical evidence is the wooden stick that hit Lin Dong at that time.

 These three points are key supplementary evidence.

During the review of evidence, Su Bai also participated and traveled to many places with Prosecutor Li Xiaorong.

 But the most important thing was to run to the police station where Lin Dong and others were guarded at the time.

 Ask the director and others what happened.

 The director of the police station is a man in his late fifties named Li Xiong.

Facing Li Xiaorong and Su Bai, they came to the police station and wanted to see the director Li Xiong and get the surveillance video from the time.

 Have seen it, I have seen it.

The other party was very considerate and brought the two of them into the office, poured them a cup of tea and asked them to wait.

  Waited for about two hours.

Li Xiong asked someone to bring over the surveillance video, but when Li Xiaorong checked it, he was completely confused.

 Surveillance video...?

The picture in the surveillance video is distorted!

It can be seen that during the whole process of the surveillance video, only the soles of the feet, that is, everyone's shoes, were captured.

  It is impossible to tell what happened at that time.

Li Xiaorong frowned slightly: "This. Surveillance video?"

Li Xiong pretended to be angry: "Normally we don't watch this surveillance video very much. I don't know who made the surveillance video crooked at some point!"

 “There are only so many images left now.”

"no way"

"We must pay attention to this situation next time, and there will never be any accidents. This time it was our mistake, but this should also be used as evidence, right?"

  Should also be used as evidence.…

Hearing this sentence, Li Xiaorong didn't say anything more.

how to say

He can't say anything about this kind of thing. After all, you asked for the surveillance video, and they gave it to you, right?

 I'm cooperating with you. It's not my fault that I couldn't capture the rest of the surveillance footage!

Right?

 What’s the problem with this? There is nothing wrong with it at all.

Li Xiaorong also showed Su Bai the relevant evidence.

After reading it, Su Bai said:

 Surveillance video, as the most intuitive and direct evidence, was lost directly?

  No, it’s not a direct loss, it’s equivalent to a direct loss, because they cooperate with your work, but there is nothing in the surveillance. Who can blame you?

 Let’s just say that the cooperation is not adequate.

 As long as it’s in place.

The most direct evidence has not been obtained, so it is relatively difficult to obtain physical evidence and make breakthroughs from the oral confessions of Xu Feng and others.

.

 ….

 Two people go together.

Li Xiaorong kept complaining: “Lawyer Su’s case is very difficult to handle!”

“Based on the current confession and direct evidence, it is completely possible to make a judgment!”

ˆ “.”

Su Bai spoke with a smile. It was obvious that Li Xiaorong was a responsible prosecutor and might be a little tired after working for a long time.

So he opened his mouth and explained: "Prosecutor Li."

“It’s not that I insist on holding on to this point, but I want to give an explanation to my client.”

 “Let’s not talk about anything else first.”

“Isn’t there a significant difference between striking with weapons and without weapons?”

“The wooden stick is the main physical evidence. If Xu Feng and others change their confession after the verdict, they will not admit it.

 Apply for re-filing of the case to the higher court and the supervisory department for judgment.

  Major physical evidence is missing.

 When the time comes to pursue accountability, Prosecutor Li will also be responsible. "

“Besides, prosecutor Li doesn’t think it’s strange that the relevant physical evidence in this case cannot be found?”

“Maybe it’s a big case.?”

Li Xiaorong smiled and nodded when he heard Su Bai's explanation.

 “It makes sense.”

“Lawyer Su, I think it’s too unfair for you to be a lawyer. You should take the public exam.”

 “Let’s go to work together from now on.”

Su Bai smiled and said nothing.

 Bai Jun Law Firm has developed so far that he is really reluctant to give it up now.

 Furthermore, he still has to complete the task of the system well.

 The conversation between the two people did not last long.

 As for the rest of the matter, Su Bai, as a lawyer, cannot directly participate.

 We can only wait for Li Xiaorong to continue the review as prosecutor.

 Just as for the direction of review, Su Bai made a small suggestion:

“Prosecutor Li can focus on the confessions of the three defendants. The confessions of the three people are definitely different.”

“It’s the same confession, and there’s only one reason for it, and that is that three people have testified against each other.”

Li Xiaorong nodded, obviously listening.

In this case, the pressure of public opinion has been increasing in recent times, which has put the prosecutors under a lot of pressure.

 He also wanted to solve this case quickly.

.

 ….

Li Xiaorong handed the surveillance video to the relevant departments for verification.

 He himself focused on investigating Xu Feng, Li Tao, and Zhang Manlei.

In this inquiry, according to normal thinking, Xu Feng, Li Tao, and Zhang Manlei's various statements are definitely different.

Why?

 Because most people are emotionally overwhelmed and cannot restore the details of the time.

 Subconsciously, you will shirk yourself in order to reduce your crime. After all, no one wants to take trouble on you.

 But what is the result?

 The result is that Xu Feng, Li Tao, and Zhang Manlei’s statements are consistent. There is obviously something wrong with this!

 Leave professional matters to professional personnel.

Li Xiaorong applied to have other districts review Xu Feng and others.

 Within a few days, a big turning point came out of the review!

 Learned one of the most critical clues.

 What is this most critical clue?

The most critical clue is that when they were on guard duty, Xu Feng and three others and Lin Dong were deliberately arranged to be together.

ˆ And.

Xu Feng and three others admitted that they had used wooden sticks to hit Lin Dong. But they don’t know the whereabouts of the physical evidence.

“Then do you know how the physical evidence appeared at that time? That is, where did the wooden stick that you said hit Lin Dong come from?”

Li Xiaorong hurried to the review location and asked Xu Feng.

Xu Feng knows the most about this matter, and he can see that Xu Feng is relatively tactful personally and knows what is right for him and what is wrong for him.

 Hand in charge of all Li Xiaorong’s inquiries.

After learning the contents of the matters explained by Xu Feng, Li Xiaorong frowned slightly, left the interrogation room, and lit a cigarette.

 According to Xu Feng….

 In this case, these three people are not the only ones who may need to be prosecuted.

.

 ….

 According to Xu Feng and the others, the situation at that time was that the four of them had a quarrel and had a dispute. In this case, they were taken to talk.

but.…

Lin Dong's temper was not good, which led to conflicts with Fang Tang and Dong Bing.

Fang Tang and Dong Bing were furious and wanted to teach Lin Dong a lesson, so they were imprisoned together.

During this process, he impulsively threw a wooden stick into the guard station, saying that he wanted them to beat him there.

 The conflict that broke out as a result.

  Leading to the final outcome.

.

 ….

This is the entire cause of the incident. According to part of the surveillance video, it can be clearly seen that there is nothing wrong with what Xu Feng said.

 But Li Xiaorong still doesn’t understand this case, if it involves this factor.

 But what about other aspects?

 For example, the most critical and important point in this case is why it was initially stated that Lin Dong died due to a sudden heart attack.

 It is not a small matter to know that three people surrounded and beat Lin Dong, leading to Lin Dong's death.

 Through the injury examination, it can definitely be found that Lin Dong died as a result of being beaten.

So it was said that Lin Dong's death was caused by a sudden illness. After the autopsy, it was directly revealed.

  Why did you tell lies in the first place and not let the forensic doctor conduct an autopsy?

 It’s totally unnecessary!

However, for the time being, no effective clues have been obtained for this reason.

It can only be attributed to the fact that Dong Bing and Fang Tang do not want to take responsibility for themselves.

.

 ….

After the evidence was complete, the prosecutor soon indicted Xu Feng, Fang Tang and others for intentional homicide and negligent death.

 The case will continue to be heard by Guangdu Intermediate People’s Court….

Similarly, this time the litigation trial was still conducted by the then presiding judge Wang Lei.

 The defendant remains the defendant.

  It's just that the evidence we have is completely different from the previous situation, and two more people have been charged with guilt.

 And through this in-depth investigation, it was found that the supplementary evidence has been completed, and the rest is without any other unexpected circumstances.

 The day of court.

The prosecutor added that the sentences for Xu Tao and others started with ten years each.

 In addition, a public prosecution was launched against Fang Tang and Dong Bing for their negligence and it was recommended that the sentence be sentenced to two and a half years.

 Faced with the adjournment of the investigation and prosecution and the prosecution, Fang Tang and Dong Bing looked very unnatural.

 Confronted with the content of the charges, the two men admitted.

But apparently the two people did not plead guilty, nor did they believe that they had committed criminal negligence, so they hired a criminal lawyer in Guangzhou as a defense lawyer.

 At the court hearing.

Wang Lei opened another trial on this case and added the criminal conduct of the two defendants.

“Regarding the criminal negligence of Fang Tang and Dong Bing mentioned by the prosecutor, do the two of them have anything to add?”

The defense lawyers of the two men defended not guilty in this trial.

 The definition of criminal negligence was explained by two lawyers, Fang Tang and Dong Bing respectively.

 Subjectively, Fang Tang and Dong Bing did not commit criminal negligence.

 It is just within the scope of one's own behavior, without anticipating the corresponding results, and the impact caused by impulse.

Presiding judge Wang Lei didn’t hear much about these.

 Still asked the prosecutor Su Bai for his opinion.

Su Bai participated in the trial and investigation stage of this case, but did not participate too much.

 The main reason is that he is just a lawyer and does not involve the issue of judicial status.

 This is why, under normal circumstances, it is very difficult for lawyers to investigate and collect evidence without judicial intervention.

The main point of Su Bai’s statement is the opinion on rejection of the application.

 “Presiding Judge.…”

“First of all, I don’t agree with the other party’s defense of innocence because the other party has obvious negligence.”

“At the same time...during the investigation of this case, Fang Tang and Dong Bing clearly obstructed the judicial investigation.”

“And colluded with criminal suspect Xu Feng and others to confess.”

“According to the prosecutor’s investigation, why didn’t Xu Feng and others tell the story before?”

 “But choose to hide it?”

“Here, I would like to ask the defendant Xu Feng, why did you choose to conceal it in the first place and collude with two other people to confess?”

“Why did you choose to plead guilty and accept punishment?”

 “What is the reason for this?”

Xu Feng's answer was also very honest. The reason was that Fang Tang told him that as long as the physical evidence was concealed.

 They did not count him as armed to cause death, and provided him with relevant legal knowledge.

 Hold objects causing death and conflicts arising from fights.

 There is a big difference in sentencing between the two.

 So they chose to hide it, and it went well at first because they were willing to confess and convict.

 Then later, there is still the possibility of retracting the confession.

 But Su Bai appeared and directly asked for supplementary evidence, disrupting their thoughts.

 This has also resulted in the current results and situation.



 At the court hearing, Su Bai rubbed his eyebrows.

 So far, the general process of the case during the trial has clearly emerged.

 The next step is to find fault.

 Determining fault is relatively simple.

 The case has been investigated by the prosecutor, and now the evidence chain is sufficient, but it is only determined from a subjective point of view.

 This identification can be verified from the side.

The rest of the results are self-evident. Su Bai has been beaten many times for the crime of negligence causing death.

 In this case.…

 There is basically no problem in determining negligence.

 The most important thing is, can it be determined to be intentional...?

 This point is more important.

 PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~

 (End of this chapter)