As a Lawyer, You Sent the Judge In?
Chapter 260: Recreate classic scenes! Refute repeatedly!
Chapter 260 Recreates the classic scene! Refute repeatedly!
According to the content rejected by the presiding judge Guan Dongfeng in this trial.
There is no big problem.
At the court hearing.
Only by showing relevant evidence can the procedure be designated as illegal.
Su Bai’s statement just now is actually implying or indicating Meng Ziyi’s oral confession and related testimony, as well as the identification scene and other circumstances.
It was not done out of his subjective will.
But suffered from persecution.
In addition...the prisoners in the detention center may have received instructions from others when they beat Meng Ziyi.
only.…
In this regard, Su Bai has no direct evidence to prove these situations.
So it was rejected by the chief judge.
It is normal to be rejected, but from the perspective of the presiding judge.
The presiding judge still tended to believe that Meng Ziyi was a serious criminal suspect.
So the presiding judge didn’t quite believe it, or didn’t care much about the situation in which Yu Meng Ziyi was beaten by other prisoners to force a confession.
.
….
Facing the presiding judge’s questioning again, Su Bai continued to speak: “Presiding judge, we have other things that need to be stated.”
As the presiding judge, Guan Dongfeng showed a hint of impatience on his face after hearing Su Bai's words, but he quickly calmed down.
He has read this case, and there are basically no other problems with Meng Ziyi's judgment.
What made him impatient was that Su Bai had been in court to correct procedural errors or illegal acts.
He also knows something about Su Bai, the top criminal lawyer in the country.
He has encountered such top lawyers before when handling cases.
For this kind of top lawyer, he knows what the other party wants to do and what he likes to do.
What I most want to do and enjoy most is to point out procedural errors or illegal procedures in court.
Or have a heated argument with the presiding judge's collegial panel and put on a show for the client.
Regardless of the subsequent verdict, just take the lawyer's fees and walk away.
He didn’t know if Su Bai was this kind of lawyer.
But based on what he just stated, there is absolutely no problem for him to refute the other party.
ˆ Guan Dongfeng can roughly guess what Su Bai will say next.
Again, pointing out a program error?
Or is the procedure in a certain place illegal?
But what if you point it out?
Having pointed it out, can these issues affect the final outcome of the judgment?
cannot!
As the presiding judge, he does not need to know whether the evidence is legal. He only needs to know the source of the evidence and whether the evidence chain is complete.
Can a judgment be made?
At present, what he wants to see is whether Su Bai can come up with key legal basis or important evidence clues in this trial.
If not.…
So, in this court trial, no matter how much Su Bai showed, or how fiercely he behaved.
It will not affect the final judgment at all.
.
….
At the presiding judge's seat, Guan Dongfeng said calmly: "Then, please ask the defendant to entrust a lawyer to state your other views."
“However, as the presiding judge, I would like to remind you.”
“The defendant is requested to appoint a lawyer not to state matters unrelated to this case or the trial during the defense period. Other aspects can be made in court statements, but not during the defense period.”
“A good judge.”
Su Bai nodded.
There are too many problems in this trial. In terms of simple evidence, there are certain loopholes.
As for the presiding judge, I have opinions about him.
Su Bai:?
Even if he has any objections, he will still fight for the maximum legal rights and interests of his client.
Innocent means innocent!
“Presiding judge, what we are going to state next is the evidence regarding the prosecution’s accusation.”
“According to the evidence submitted by the prosecution...”
“The specific content of the evidence is: Our client voluntarily admitted the crime he committed.”
“And explained the cause and course of the matter and related matters.”
“I would like to ask, has there been any relevant research on the origin and process of the incident in this court trial, as well as the preparation of related matters and physical evidence?”
“For example: in Meng Ziyi’s statement, how did he kill the two parties involved?”
“In the evidence submitted, Meng Ziyi’s statement stated that he killed the two parties with a knife.”
“So what about this knife? Have the reduction and law enforcement parties found the relevant murder weapon?”
“Meng Ziyi only stated during the review that he killed Gu Qiao and Xie Wei with a knife.”
“State how to kill.”
“The corresponding process has been stated. Let’s not mention whether the corresponding process is real. According to the evidence provided, these processes are very reasonable, very targeted and well-founded.”
“But there was no murder weapon.”
“Where is the murder weapon?”
“Why can’t I find the tools for committing the crime?”
“Without the most important physical evidence, it is impossible to form a corresponding chain of evidence. Why was Mencius sentenced to death based on these?”
“This is completely unreasonable!”
“Furthermore, it only takes 20 minutes to drive from the dinner party to the crime scene. Meng Ziyi didn’t have a car at the dinner party, so how did he get to the crime scene?”
“According to his “confession”, he took a taxi. Have any clues about this taxi been verified?”
“It shouldn’t be difficult for law enforcement and prosecutors to find clues about a taxi.”
“Why hasn’t this taxi been found for so long?”
“Is this taxi unable to be found, or does this taxi not exist?”
“Based on the above, our summary is as follows:”
“First: the murder weapon was not found.”
“Second: The failure to find a taxi from the dinner party to the crime scene is equivalent to - based on basic logic, Mencius said that the time limit from the dinner party to the crime scene is not enough.”
“Based on the above two points, we believe that the evidence is insufficient and needs to be supplemented by the prosecution.”
“The above are our other views.”
After Su Bai finished his statement, the prosecutor at the prosecutor's seat, Bai Haojie, answered Su Bai's questions.
“Based on the evidence submitted by the law enforcement party, it can be clearly seen that in the logic of other matters, there can be relevant evidence to prove the factual basis.”
"As a person with a background in criminal investigation, is there a possibility that Meng Ziyi deliberately left physical evidence and explained other matters to ensure that he could get a commutation of his sentence, but after learning that he could not get a commutation of his sentence, he deliberately left physical evidence, Prepare for your own escape?"
“We have every reason to doubt this.”
“Because as a criminal investigator, he has a very strong counter-investigation ability and knows what evidence is beneficial to him and what evidence is not beneficial to him.”
"so.…"
“It is entirely possible that he deliberately concealed the relevant murder weapons and concealed the tools he used to go to the crime scene.”
“The above is my policy and my answer to the questions raised by the defendant’s litigation lawyers.”
Bai Haojie's statement made Su Bai frown slightly.
Deliberately leaving physical evidence to prepare yourself for escaping the crime?
Is Meng Ziyi’s TMD a disease?
If he really killed the person, then why did he tell other things and only throw away the physical evidence?
is this necessary?
Completely unnecessary!
If it is not Mencius’s confession, complete all the clues.
If he can withstand the pressure of interrogation.
Then there is no evidence in this case to prove that Meng Ziyi is a murderer!
Why did Meng Ziyi speak?
Because he could not withstand the interrogation and the pressure put on him in the detention center.
It can only be stated in certain ways and complete the non-existent processes and details.
Why is there no information about the murder weapon and the taxi he took?
Because TMD people were not killed by Mencius at all!
None of these things exist, and law enforcement and prosecutors cannot find them at all.
Meng Ziyi didn’t know where these things were, and couldn’t tell them even if he wanted to. This was the main reason why he couldn’t find these two things!
It is said that Meng Ziyi is a criminal investigator and can withstand pressure. In order to escape guilt, he hid the relevant murder weapons.
Are you kidding me?
If Meng Ziyi really had that kind of consciousness and that kind of firm intention. There is no need to say anything else.
If he does not confess anything, then there will be no so-called evidence to accuse him.
It can only be said that Meng Ziyi is very suspected of committing a crime.
But there is no evidence to prove that he actually committed a crime.
Let’s talk again.
Meng Ziyi explained both the criminal process and the crime process during the interrogation.
It is simply unreasonable not to hand over physical evidence!
So in response to Bai Haojie’s statement, Su Bai immediately retorted:
“Is there any factual basis or evidence for the prosecutor’s statement? Is the prosecutor’s statement based on his own thoughts and suspicions?”
“The prosecution’s suspicion is completely unreasonable!”
“Meng Ziyi has already explained the other detailed processes and specific circumstances. Why didn’t he disclose the murder weapon and the information on where the crime occurred?”
"also."
“Meng Ziyi has confessed, but why haven’t law enforcement and prosecutors made any progress?”
“It may be said that the murder weapon was well hidden by Meng Ziyi.”
“But what about the way Meng Ziyi went to the scene of the crime?”
“Relying on human running ability, it is definitely impossible to reach the crime scene at that time. You must take transportation or riding a vehicle.”
“Why didn’t the prosecutors and law enforcement agencies investigate and find out what Meng Ziyi’s riding vehicle was or the vehicle he took? Isn’t this difficult?”
“Things that have not been investigated are equivalent to having no evidence.”
“Furthermore, according to the forensic identification report, the deaths of Gu Qiao and Xie Wei were caused by a certain type of knife.”
“This type of knife did not appear in Meng Ziyi’s home, and there is no evidence that Meng Ziyi purchased this type of knife.”
"Why does this happen?"
“Is there a possibility that Meng Ziyi does not have this so-called murder weapon?”
“He didn’t kill anyone or buy a knife, so he certainly doesn’t know where the murder weapon went.”
“This is also verified from the side. Meng Ziyi did not kill Xie Wei and Gu Qiao.”
“Because there is no direct evidence to prove that Xie Wei and Gu Qiao were killed by Mencius.”
At this time, Bai Haojie asked:
“According to the statement of the lawyer entrusted by the defendant, why did Meng Ziyi state that he killed the person during the first trial?”
“If he wasn’t the one who killed it, why would he admit it?”
Su Bai: Do you have to force me to be so direct?
Why admit that this is not an obvious fact?
Su Bai immediately retorted: "Just now I asked Meng Ziyi to show the scars on his body."
“Meng Ziyi had no choice but to confess because he was beaten, humiliated and mentally tortured by the prisoners.”
“But in court...the court is a very sacred place.”
“The law sits here.”
“Meng Ziyi can explain his grievances, the unfair treatment he suffered, and why he confessed.”
“This is also the reason why Meng Ziyi chose to retract his confession in the High Court.”
“And we think so.”
“In this case, without the most direct physical evidence, that is, the murder weapon, it cannot explain how Meng Ziyi arrived at the scene of the crime.”
“If these two points are not explained clearly, we will not admit the prosecution’s accusations.”
“So we would like to ask the Kunming High Court and the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office to conduct another investigation into this case.”
“Accept the confession of our client Meng Ziyi.”
“The above is our statement.”
Su Bai took a deep breath, and after finishing his statement, he focused his gaze on the presiding judge's seat.
how to say.…
The most critical murder weapon was not found, and the first-instance verdict was completely hard.
It is based on Mencius Ziyi’s oral confession, and subsequent evidence will be supplemented.
ˆ And.
Su Bai learned that during the first trial, the presiding judge of the first trial told Meng Ziyi.
If the most important physical evidence, the murder weapon, is handed over, then Meng Ziyi will be sentenced to a suspended death.
But if you don’t confess, it will be the death penalty.
It happened that Su Bai initiated a second trial before his death sentence was executed.
Otherwise.…
This case may become a particularly serious injustice.
At the trial bench, Guan Dongfeng, as the presiding judge, became even more irritated when facing Su Bai.
The murder weapon and how to get to the crime scene are indeed very important.
The defendant’s litigation lawyer indeed grasped this aspect and made a statement.
But.…
All suspicions in this case point to Meng Ziyi.
When the intermediate court made its judgment, it also sentenced the death penalty.
He has discussed with the relevant personnel of the High Court and found that there is not much problem with the Intermediate Court’s judgment.
So….
How should the judgment be made in this case?
After thinking for a while, Guan Dongfeng asked a very classic question.
“Let’s not discuss the physical evidence for now.”
“All the evidence in this case points to Meng Ziyi as a serious suspect.”
“According to the statements of the dinner party members and Meng Ziyi’s own statements, it all points to him, with the direct intention of killing the two parties involved.”
“As a criminal investigator, Meng Ziyi knew very well that Gu Qiao and Xie Wei were killed. What would be the consequences if he admitted this crime?”
“But why can’t he stand up for himself?”
“He didn’t kill the person, why should he admit it?”
“Is it because of the above reasons that Meng Ziyi admitted that he killed Gu Qiao and Xie Wei?”
How come the presiding judge’s thoughts and questions seem a bit familiar?
no.…
Why is this question so outrageous?
He was not the one who killed the person, why did he admit it?
That's because when he was in the detention center, he was already facing a mental breakdown, and he may have suffered more torture than death at that time.
So I admitted it.
But admitting it does not mean that he actually killed someone.
Isn't the presiding judge's question too tendentious?
Facing the inquiry, Su Bai only stared at the judgment seat.
Open your mouth:
“Presiding judge, based on the above reasons, Meng Ziyi did admit the fact that he committed murder, but whether he committed murder will be determined based on the evidence.”
“We believe that the judgment against our client is incomplete in terms of evidence.”
“Based on this, we apply again to dismiss the complaint against us.”
After finishing the statement.
Su Bai’s eyes met Guan Dongfeng’s.
Unwavering.
At the same time.
Li Xuezhen looked serious, straightened her chest, and had a firm look in her eyes.
Facts are facts, evidence is evidence.…
Just do it as it should be.…
The Baijun Law Firm will never let any client suffer an unjust verdict for no reason!
She was waiting for lawyer Su's statement to influence the presiding judge and make him face the trial.
What should I do if I can’t?
cannot.…
Then you can’t blame me, Xiao Li, for swearing.
If not, send them all in, one, two, three, four, five...
No one can be missing!
PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~
(End of this chapter)
You'll Also Like
-
Fairy sister from heaven
Chapter 369 1 hours ago -
Evil Hero
Chapter 409 2 hours ago -
Throne of the North
Chapter 417 3 hours ago -
Doomsday: I Build an Infinite Train
Chapter 110 3 hours ago -
Become a wizard lord with a copy system
Chapter 126 4 hours ago -
Bro, you are a policeman, not a thug.
Chapter 505 4 hours ago -
Extract Xiuxian University at the beginning
Chapter 127 4 hours ago -
Cyberpunk: 2075
Chapter 388 4 hours ago -
Fantasy Library
Chapter 120 4 hours ago -
I synthesized the whole world
Chapter 292 12 hours ago