Blackstone Code

The Progressive Party destroys people's happiness, the Conservative Party rebuilds a happy home...

In the control room, Lynch watched the conservative candidates talk about the economy and people's livelihood, and suddenly felt very boring.

They are all old-fashioned things. Two hundred years ago, when they stepped on the slaves' heads and stood in a high position, waving the woolen hats in their hands, and shouting "freedom and sovereignty" loudly, they hung these things on the Around the mouth.

Two hundred years later, they still said the same thing, but this time they wanted to coerce more people.

The rhetoric has changed a lot, but the core has never changed.

The vigilance between classes hidden throughout the article is almost revealed from between the lines!

If workers' happiness is to be wet with sweat on the assembly line and tired like a dog, then the salary they receive at the end of the month can only meet their daily expenses and leave a little surplus.

Isn't it too humble to be so happy?

It was indeed a bold move to let the Conservative candidate speak first, which may make the debate boring to some.

The camera was directed to Catherine, who had prepared relevant content. She first expressed her disagreement with the Conservative candidate's definition of happiness.

This also made the audience at the scene and in front of the TV a little more excited.

In fact, this kind of disagreement, opposition, and conflict is obvious.

After all, the political platforms, political opinions, and political purposes of the three parties are different, and their understanding, measures, and prognosis of the same matter are also different.

From the perspective of the Conservative Party, maintaining stable operation of society is the greatest happiness for the people, but for the Progressive Party, it is obvious that this is not necessarily the case.

“Happiness and income may be related, but income is not the whole story of happiness.”

Catherine's first sentence can set the tone, and it does not completely deny the theory of economic supremacy. This is also the topic most frequently mentioned by presidential candidates during the general election.

They will promise voters that they will improve the economy and increase income after coming to power, but not many people can achieve this.

"Growing up slowly is happiness, spending time with your family is happiness, and watching your children grow up is happiness."

"There are too many things in this world that can make us feel happy. It doesn't necessarily mean that the economy is going up. We make more money, which is happiness."

"There are many definitions of happiness, and the Conservative candidate's overemphasis on the role of economics in achieving happiness seems to me more like the same old thing."

"For most of the past two hundred years, the Conservative Party has firmly controlled the political power of this country. So I would like to ask the Conservative candidate, do you think people have been happy in the past two hundred years?"

As soon as this question appeared on the scene, most of the audience watching this program immediately started clapping and whistling!

happiness?

Apart from the middle class and upper class, how many people can be called happy?

The Conservative candidate kept retorting, "So you think people have been unhappy over the past few years?"

"They have stable income, stable education, and appropriate social security mechanisms. They can enjoy all the conveniences and benefits that society brings to them."

"Without having to worry about how to survive now or tomorrow!"

A group of people in the audience who had clearly supported Catherine just now turned around and supported the Conservative candidate. Therefore, these voters had no position at all. They were too easily influenced by new information and constantly changed their minds.

Catherine connected with his words with almost no pause, "If you mean stability, you mean that every family needs to bear heavy loans, high living expenses, lower spending power and risk tolerance."

"Even graduating from high school with excellent grades but not having the opportunity to go to college is happiness. So I think this kind of happiness is not the happiness of the people!"

"If this was true happiness, I wouldn't be standing here today discussing with you what happiness is!"

People fell in love with Catherine again, because her words can be said to directly hit the hearts of the people at the bottom of society!

In particular, she used herself and Lynch as examples. Of course, more people thought she was using Lynch as an example, including some commentators invited to the scene.

They all thought that the person who was excellent in studies but could not go to college was simply talking about Lynch, not her.

After all, only one "benchmark" is enough, and this one must be the best one.

Catherine's sharp speech immediately won people's favor, and they began to recall the bills that gave them headaches every cycle, the terrible tax rates, the caution in resisting the urge to consume in the face of those goods, and the family difficulties they faced. Feeling helpless.

This is really not happiness!

The applause and whistles were also loud at the scene. After Momo's active intervention, people became quiet again.

Ms. Tracy, who had been silent until now, suddenly turned on the microphone.

"Society has always been developing. When it comes to the issue of happiness, we cannot always look at it from the perspective of the past."

"Many years ago, women did not have any status in society. In some areas and some people, women even felt that women were inherently inferior."

"For women at that time, no matter how much money they got, would you say they were happy?"

"Even now, do you think those girls standing on the street are happy?"

"The money they get every time is much more than what you said the workers get from working!"

"If having enough money is happiness, then these girls must be happy!"

The Conservative candidate is mortified, he’s under siege!

"Escort services are illegal, and we don't discuss whether people who break the law are happy or not."

"And they violated federal laws, and I'm not interested in their happiness or not!"

These words are a bit unscrupulous. Ms. Tracy does not have the psychological burden of Catherine. She can't win this election anyway, so she will fight in her own style.

She immediately shot back, "Before you think they don't deserve happiness, you'd better use your brain to think about why they do this!"

"According to you, as long as everyone works and lives according to what they should do, they will be happy."

"Then why don't you come and tell us whether these young girls were happy or unhappy before they entered these industries?"

"If they are happy, why would they sell their dignity?"

"If they are unhappy, then who makes them unhappy?"

"Is it the economic upswing you are talking about, or the big shots who decide everything?"

This question is indeed not easy to answer, because any answer would have to involve a small number of vulnerable groups in society.

The Conservative candidate glared at Ms. Tracey, "Those girls have healthy bodies and complete limbs. Why can other people protect their minimum living standards through even an ordinary job, but they chose to sell their dignity?" ?”

"It's because they gave up the right to happiness, it's not that happiness didn't favor them!"

Ms. Tracy continued her attack without showing any signs of weakness, and tore up more decency, "If you mean work, you mean letting them wear miniskirts to show off in the company, or even become part of the culture of sexual dominance."

"There are not many jobs left for women in this society, and discrimination and prejudice against women can be seen everywhere. Before the war, the number of women who had jobs was less than 10% of the total female population. Is this considered a blessing? ?”

The conservative candidate became more and more annoyed. Ms. Tracy was chasing him like a dog and biting him. He did not provoke this woman!

"We are discussing happiness, not women's rights. I know you are concerned about this, but please don't put it here!"

Ms. Tracy was still very strong, "So you think women are not worthy of talking about happiness?"

The conservative candidate couldn't stand it anymore, "I protested, she kept changing the concept secretly, she didn't come to participate in the debate at all, she just wanted to quarrel with me!"

Momo glanced at the control room. Lynch pressed the microphone and said a few words, and his voice reached Momo's ears.

Then she immediately smiled and said, "I think happiness is something that should benefit everyone. This is happiness in the true sense."

"If it can only benefit a few people, a few others, then it is not happiness, at least most people are unhappy."

"I don't agree with the Conservative candidate's views. As a woman, I support the Popular Party candidate's statement. Women's happiness is also happiness."

The Conservative candidate glanced at Momo a few times, knowing that he was in trouble now, and then looked at the other commentators, but no one seemed willing to say a few words for him.

A note came up from below. He glanced at it and then closed his mouth.

Catherine and Ms. Tracy each spoke for a while. He did not argue and remained silent. He avoided fierce sophistry by acquiescing to the other party's point of view.

He planned to use his strength in the second part, but he gave up on the first part.

Seeing as the Conservative candidate stopped talking, it was clear that was the end of the first issue.

Momo then brought up Ms. Tracey’s human rights issues and discussed them.

Ms. Tracey was quick to make her case, linking her victory to human rights issues.

In the course of her argument, she argued that everyone should be created equal with their rights and duties as described in the Bible.

Whether they are gentlemen or homeless people on the roadside, at least they should enjoy the same rights and obligations in terms of human rights.

Life and human rights should not change due to a series of additional factors such as race, status, wealth, fame, etc.

And she focused on the issue of women's human rights, for which Catherine expressed her approval.

After all, she is a woman too, and in a sense, they are in league with each other!

The Conservative candidate is also well aware that this topic is sensitive, and he wants to say that opposing Ms. Tracey's views is tantamount to being rejected by female voters.

So even though he was unwilling in his heart, he still avoided this issue by agreeing with Ms. Tracy's point of view.