British 1986

It has been more than two months since I started the book, and the word count has reached over 400,000.

I usually like to read comments. I basically read every comment to see what the readers’ feedback is.

I originally fantasized about copying book reviews, but I don’t know why. My books generally don’t have many reviews. It seems that readers don’t like to review books by popular authors?

Today I am getting irritated by writing and writing, so I have sorted out a few more representative Q\u0026A questions and replied here in a unified manner (quibbles).

First the first one.

In the first few chapters, there are some wise and beautiful comments there.

①Why does the protagonist look down on America? What qualifications do you, a British aristocrat, have to look down on Americans? Don’t you know how strong America will be in the future?

Answer: I am actually a little numb when I see this kind of comment. Anyone who knows something about history should know how the United States came to be, right?

Their history totals more than two hundred years. Guess what happened before they became independent?

Why can't the traditional nobles with the British look down on them?

Moreover, the section in the book about looking down on the daughter of a wealthy businessman is a real incident that has been corroborated by countless real events. Even if you don’t understand it, you can learn about it.

Why do you have to ramble on to me? Some people think that Meili is strong. That's because you only know them in terms of publicity, but it doesn't mean that others care about them as much as these people know.

I read that in some comments, they always tell me something like, what others do in Europe and the United States, you can't do what you do.

Good guy, when you say "Europe and America", do you think of Europe and North America as a whole?

In some cases, such words can be used in a general direction, but as long as you break it down, Europe is Europe, the United States is the United States, and there are so many countries and regions, and some people regard them as the same. This kind of thing I I simply can’t complain.

Could it be that when you read a period novel, if the protagonist travels back to China, then the island country was still very strong before. Does the protagonist also have to think highly of the island country?

This is a matter of stance, what's there to argue about?

②The dialogues in this book have no translation accent, no sense of substitution, and are unreal.

Answer: Some time ago, someone came up to me and pointed at me, saying this and that, and that the book was written for his own people. Why do books with foreign themes have to be written in a translation style?

Is it uncomfortable?

Oh God, I really want to kick you in the butt.

I still remember that Mr. Li Jiaxin, a reader with a picture of Li Jiaxin on his face, and a boastful look. He pointed at me and said that he supported me in both books. He also helped me recommend books and praised me. You must listen to his opinions and don't be blind-hearted.

I looked it up based on his name. Good guy, both books have 2 fan points. The total of the two books adds up to 4 fan points. I am really touched by your support.

Forget about anything else, just give me a reward of gold or silver. I will bring my second uncle in France and ask him to find you a pure Londoner, who can read English to you in person with a London accent. , is this enough to give a sense of immersion?

③Drunk, are you in 1986? Do you think there were no cameras or video cameras in that era? In our city, in the 1980s and 1990s, people had handheld cameras when they were getting married, and they grabbed a lot of them. It goes without saying that there are more people in Hong Kong than in foreign countries.

Answer: This question is still posted in the book review area. I originally replied to him, but it seems that it cannot be posted.

This makes me angry

To say something unpleasant, I simply have no intention of typing.

Let me make a solemn statement.

If there are any professional questions, I don’t understand. Or don’t rush to spray it before you understand it, we can search it.

But I don’t understand, so if I just change the concept secretly and act like I’m being guided, I’m really messing up my mentality.

The camera that shoots movies is called a film camera, and it uses film! film! film!

The difference between this thing and the digital cameras that were used to shoot movies later is that the later digital cameras are visual and easy to edit. The director can see the scenes shot in several shots while sitting in front of the monitor.

And the earliest film camera in the book was not a camera!

Although cameras also use film, it is called film and is used for taking photos!

In the past, what was used for TV interviews and celebration recordings was called an analog video recorder.

Look clearly, video recorder!

The video recorder is plugged into the video tape!

This thing is portable, but the pixels of the things it shoots are poor, and it is only suitable for small screens, that is, TVs. This was earlier in the era, and it was popularized in the 1980s and 1990s, and it existed even earlier.

But it is completely different from the film camera used to shoot movies.

When you enlarge the things captured by the video recorder and watch them on the big screen, they basically look grainy.

Do you understand pixel pixel?

In the 1980s and 1990s, the images captured by video recorders had hundreds of thousands of pixels, which was great. Later high-definition video recorders were released even later!

This type of video recorder has evolved from the earliest cassettes and tapes to later discs and hard drives.

Video recorders and cameras are not the same thing!

Coal-burning trains and high-speed trains both run on railways and can transport people and goods. Can you say that they are the same thing?

The reader named @unlimited monthly ticket, thank you very much for giving me popular knowledge, I thank you!

I was originally planning to face off against him, but I found that I couldn't comment. I specially opened a single chapter to explain it. I was really frustrated.

Okay, I’m done with my rants, and I’m sorry to disturb you readers. I’m going to continue coding.