British Civil Servant

Of course, it is the credit of Alan Wilson. This is not the time to be humble. He accepted the praise of the Paleontological Association with a microphone, and expressed his humility in another field. "The research results of the Carnian flood event are everyone, not me alone. Thanks to people, in fact, I just expressed support for the relevant research on behalf of the government, and provided related funds, and did nothing else, and the signature put me first, that's it?"

"Sir, everyone in the Paleontological Association knows that you are the giant in this field." Ike immediately expressed his opinion, not flattering the secretary general of the cabinet, but pure respect for experts in the industry, "Without your strong support and reasonable extrapolated hypotheses would not have had such results."

"You can do whatever you want." Excessive modesty is hypocrisy, and Alan Wilson put down the phone directly, because the news of Sudan's resignation came, and he was still in a pretty good mood today.

The British public opinion should be mobilized, bragging, and unabashedly attributing the change of the Sudanese system to the external pressure led by the British. Of course, the important role of the Kingdom of Egypt and the Kingdom of Yinlak must not be forgotten. The UK is not as overwhelming as the US and the Soviet Union. Sexual power must respect the role of other nations.

After returning home, Allen Wilson shared the good news with his wife, and Pamela Mountbatten asked, "If this is the case, will the financial expenditure be expanded again? After all, the change in Sudan requires assistance first."

"That's a matter of the Arab world." Alan Wilson made two inferences, "Britain is not the Soviet Union. Although Sudan was once a traditional British colony, the value of Sudan is not high to be honest. The pro-Soviet countries in the Horn of Africa , In fact, there is no benefit, the strategic position is useful to the world hegemony, but Britain is no longer the world hegemony."

If the United States is willing, the United Kingdom does not mind the United States making greater investment, but what if the United Kingdom itself?

Forget it, if Africa is really good, it won't be the last continent to be divided. This is not to say that Africa has no value, and the value of Africa is still great, but not every place is worth fighting for.

In terms of natural conditions, let alone North Africa, the Sahara Desert is such a large area that everyone can understand it.

If it is divided into regions, the whole of Africa can be summed up as North Africa is not as good as South Africa, West Africa is not as good as East Africa, and the natural conditions of eastern and southern Africa are still of some value.

The natural conditions in the northeast corner of Africa are better than Egypt, where the whole country relies on the canal for income and its life safety is based on the Nile River. But it is not enough to hold on tight and not let go.

Now that the United Kingdom has withdrawn from these places, it will be able to manage the south of Kenya with peace of mind in the future. When encountering any projects that require labor and effort, it will be fine to share the bill with a certain big country.

"But you said that the blacks in southern Africa are not as good as the Arabs." Pamela Mountbatten mentioned what her husband once said, the ethnic depression in the world.

"Most people can't do it, but it doesn't mean that their leadership is stupid. East Africa still has some foundations, and West Africa is finished. The triangular trade has already destroyed the social structure, and it also encountered a ruler like France." Alan Wilson I am very pessimistic about French Africa. Most of the bizarre coup news in Africa comes from French Africa.

The bad reputation of African black countries has an indelible relationship with the role of the French in it, and the rule of the French is not particularly strong.

If there is a country that doesn't care about the French military and is determined to infiltrate French Africa, the French can't help it. Later generations of Russian mercenaries beat the French in Mali, and the special military operations began to relieve the French to some extent The pressure on African **** is not all bad.

"You said that you want to eradicate the pro-Soviet forces in Africa. I still don't believe it. It's not that easy." Pamela Mountbatten sighed, "It seems that we can be more optimistic, can't we?"

"The ruling foundations of different countries are different, and we should not be too optimistic. For example, Lumumba of the Democratic Republic of the Congo has ruled Congo for almost 30 years. It is not so simple. He is not old enough to even manage the country. Alan Wilson replied with a frown.

Generally, people in African countries don't care about it, and even people in the key channels of a certain big country don't know much information, let alone data. But even if he doesn't know the data, Alan Wilson feels that Lumumba's rule is no worse than Mobutu's, and the current DRC is definitely much stronger than the DRC ruled by Mobutu.

If it weren't much stronger, Rhodesia is so close to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and he asked Grace to solve the hidden dangers under his nose first, and he still needs to work hard in North Africa first?

Faced with the transformation of Central Asia, Sudan can of course boast about it, but it cannot be assumed that all pro-Soviet countries in Africa will collapse like Sudan with a little external pressure.

However, his good friend, Reagan, who is now the speaker of the United States, may not think so. Sudan announced that it would abandon the Soviet system overnight, and it is not only Britain that celebrates. The entire White House seemed to be in a sea of ​​joy. From the moment Reagan took office, he showed that the Cold War ended in his own hands.

Don't care if he really thinks so in his heart, but his performance is indeed so obvious, but in fact, the United States has only found some self-confidence in Grenada. Even Gaddafi, who historically led a population of less than four million, was not allowed to touch Reagan.

Now Sudan's compromise has allowed Reagan to find a breakthrough point, or else the old imperialism still has something to learn. Although the African strategy was proposed by the United Kingdom, Reagan felt that since the truth and reality of Africa had been discovered, the United States could Take out more power to operate.

This has two advantages. The first is to humiliate the Soviet Union, which cannot be overemphasized, and the other is to contain Britain.

The United Kingdom cannot be allowed to win a big victory in the African strategy. It is precisely because of this that the United States has to join. Only by carrying out the African strategy with the United Kingdom can the British influence in Africa be prevented from rising to a higher level.

The foreign troubles are the Soviet Union, and the internal troubles are Britain and France. Of course, the United States hopes to completely eliminate the Soviet Union, but it must also keep an eye on Britain and France to prevent these two countries from becoming rivals of the United States.

Former Secretary of State General Haig, although he has resigned, does not mean that Reagan has lost his trust in General Haig. Such a fight in Africa is more suitable for people like General Haig. You can't expect CIA agents to go to war.

"The president is right." General Haig commented sincerely, thinking that Reagan was right about internal and external troubles, and he really had to be on guard against Britain. If the Soviets left Africa, in exchange for Britain coming back, then For the United States, there is no gain at all. "African issues really deserve our attention. Not only the United Kingdom, but also France."

The African issue cannot be bypassed by France. France, which claims to have half of Africa in its hands, is actually more difficult to deal with than the United Kingdom on the surface. France uses its own hard power army and economy and soft power French and culture to colonize all these countries. The rule continues to this day.

France has always been reluctant to part with its colonies, and after suffering losses in Vietnam, it turned to take both hard and soft routes.

In another world, Britain can only do things in Africa within the framework of the Commonwealth of Nations and with France. The Commonwealth itself is very loose and has limited influence. Britain's strength lies in its hegemony in English and its leadership in educational media, influencing Africa with invisible power.

But in this world, even if the United Kingdom does not hold on to Africa as clearly as France, it still has a high sense of presence in the eyes of Washington, especially Rhodesia has become a destination for all British African white immigrants, and the other One destination, of course, is Australia.

The U.S. Africa strategy was released shortly thereafter. It is almost the same as the Whitehall's Africa strategy, but the purpose of course is to prevent the resurgence of Britain's traditional influence in pro-Soviet countries, so the fundamental core of this strategy is, No matter what Britain does, the United States will follow closely and exclude Britain's role in it.

This strategy is very smart. To fight against foreign countries, we must first settle down at home, but Alan Wilson actually didn’t care about Africa at all, nor did he have the idea of ​​restoring British influence after driving away the influence of the Soviet Union. The nails that should be left, such as Zanzibar Island, have already been completed.

As a de facto Asian country, the UK has nothing to do in Africa? Even the meeting with Prince Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia, was more important than the African strategy.

Of course, this is not the case in public opinion. The great victory of Sudan~www.wuxiaspot.com~ certainly became Mrs. Thatcher's self-expression in the House of Commons.

In fact, it is not that the Yugoslav royal family is not supported. The reason why they have ended up today is that, just like Grace, they were unlucky to meet Tito, a man who fell from heaven.

Alan Wilson has little confidence in the restoration of the Yugoslav monarchy, but preparations must also be made, which is not a conflict.

A nation like Yugoslavia, which has no de facto main body, has very little cohesion. In fact, having a king may be a good thing.

Two preparations must be made for Yugoslavia. One is to find the controllers of these enterprises in this republic of enterprise conglomerates and make a fortune together. If this cannot be done, see if Prince Alexander can condense the unity of this country.

As for who is the leader of Yugoslavia at this time, it doesn't matter. Before Tito's death, the political structure of Yugoslavia was specifically changed. Yugoslavia has no president. Instead, they are in a presidium, representing the interests of the republics. It is difficult to find an agent in such a structure. It is better to find the controller of a local enterprise. The current situation in Yugoslavia depends on how much useful information patriotic southerners can get.

Please remember the first domain name of this book: . :