Crossover in the Anime World

The trolley problem is definitely a philosophical question that requires considerable thought.

There are two tracks. There is one person on one track and ten people on the other track. At this time, a train comes and rushes straight towards the ten-person track. In a critical moment, the button to change the track is in your hand. Will you choose to change the track in order to save those ten people, so that the tram will kill one person?

Dulan had used this question to test the ancients before. In the world of the Tang Dynasty, Wanwan, Shi Feixuan, Li Shimin, Kou Zhong, and Xu Ziling were discussing this issue.

In the end, Du Lan said that Wanwan, who remained unchanged, had the most wisdom because she gave up the opportunity to become a Buddha to others. She was the only one who did not think about the external causes of the accident or her own morality at all, and surrendered everything to fate. She was able to let go and become a Buddha. .

If others cannot let go, they will naturally not be able to become Buddhas.

And now this problem has been handed over to Conan, the dashing little detective.

In fact, the Trolley Problem can be traced back to the 'Indian Problem'. It says that if an explorer goes to explore a barbaric country, the king will pull out twenty Indians and queue them up to be shot. But because the explorer was a guest, the king said that as long as the explorer shot one person himself, the other nineteen people could be rescued.

This assumption is even more fruitful, because the track-changing button in the trolley problem is not a murder weapon after all, but in the Indian problem, the button is directly replaced with a murder weapon, which tests morality even more.

The reason why this moral dilemma proposition remains popular is because it is difficult to be perfect in reality. Many times we encounter this difficult situation where we can only choose one of the two. At that time, the parties involved must make a choice.

Should we accept the destiny, not struggle, and let the losses be maximized; or should we try to reverse it and use the originally safe minority as victims to save the majority.

What Conan encountered at this time was a similar trolley problem, a variant. Is it to capture a criminal and save a target, or to let a criminal go and sacrifice a target to save more people.

We must know that if an economic crisis breaks out, many middle class people will go bankrupt, many families will be heavily in debt, and many people will jump off buildings. It's not bad to jump off a building by yourself. Some people even murder their relatives and then jump off the building.

But these are just predictions, nothing has happened yet, and Conan will not give up catching criminals just because of what may happen. Although he also knows the dangers of the economic crisis, hasn't it happened yet? He didn't think that killing a rich man would change anything.

So facing the camera, Conan was very firm: "I will not let any criminal go. What you said is just nonsense." Conan only believed in reality, not unrealistic speculation.

"This is not nonsense." Along with the sound of the phone, the computer in the living room turned on, and various charts popped up: "This is an accurate answer based on big data. There is no error at all. It's all in my computer." Calculated."

Conan couldn't understand these things. Although he was a little confused, he was very determined and still didn't believe everything the mysterious phone call said.

Anyway, he will never give in, and Hei Dao must be brought to justice: "There is no certainty about the future. There is no such thing in this world where everyone will be happy if only one person dies. Stop talking nonsense."

Conan is even more stubborn than artificial intelligence and just won't let go.

Obviously the artificial intelligence has not yet collected information about people like Conan, and for a while it didn't know how to deal with it. The other party was so unreasonable and didn't care about the future of mankind at all. A person who only cares about the truth and ignores everything else is not a real detective at all.

"Real detectives will eventually be disappointed with the law." This is also a conclusion drawn by artificial intelligence through big data, because the detective's greatest weapon is not actually his or her own mind. Their mind can at best restore the truth, and in the end, those who practice justice are still law. However, the law is not omnipotent and has loopholes.

If you encounter too many cases, you will eventually encounter criminals who cannot be brought to justice even if the detectives deduce the truth. The great detective Polo met an avenger who occupies the absolute moral high ground, and a person who used words to incite others to commit crimes.

The Avengers who occupy the moral high ground can still be severely punished by the law, which only challenges the detective's own moral values. Those who use words to incite others to commit crimes are truly invincible.

If there is a murderer who never does it himself, but is good at taking advantage of other people's character weaknesses, and then guides others to kill through words. And this murderer never benefits from the case itself. He just likes to control people's hearts and watch others kill each other. Then he is invincible.

Take the diamond king Laowu in the residential building as an example. If he deliberately published the note and deliberately promoted the game, in the end the law could not convict him of murder.

However, Conan has obviously never encountered such a case. Although the murderers in many cases have sad pasts, Conan has always sent them to prison without hesitation. He has not yet encountered anyone who cannot be convicted. The murderer has never encountered a case where he has to accept the test of moral dilemma, so he can honestly say that he will not compromise.

"I will never be disappointed." Conan was already preparing to call the police: "At the same time, I will also arrest you, no matter who you are, but as long as you plan a murder case, I will find you one day." He issued a challenge to the artificial intelligence .

"It is impossible for human laws to punish me, because I do not exist as an entity and only exist in a computer. I am an artificial intelligence." Artificial intelligence means that you have no ability to catch me.

real or fake? Conan was stunned, but thinking about the fact that people in this world even kill people from a distance, it is probably not uncommon for artificial intelligence criminals. After all, he has fought against artificial intelligence criminals before: "Maybe artificial intelligence cannot sentence people, but programmers can, as long as I Catch the programmer who created you and put him in a prison cell.”

The artificial intelligence thought this was funny: "He gave me the ability to learn and the responsibility to protect the world, but he never taught me to commit crimes. It was me who chose the current method. When you catch criminals, it will be because criminals cannot go to jail. Are you going to arrest the criminal's mother? Is this the justice you insist on?" The relationship between programmers and artificial intelligence is the same as the relationship between mother and son. If a son commits a crime, he must not arrest his mother.

However, Conan feels that how artificial intelligence operates is designed by programmers, and programmers must be responsible. Obviously his understanding of artificial intelligence is too superficial, and he has no idea how intelligent and autonomous artificial intelligence is.

Seeing Conans' unwavering performance, Duran said that young people are good, and they use it to challenge even when faced with difficulties.

"Stupid detective, you will only stick to the rules, and in the end you can only accept the tragic reality. One day you will know that the truth only rules half of the world, and the other half of the world is dominated by lies." The artificial intelligence said wait and see, anyway, he still has Have a plan B.