Crossover in the Anime World

Conan thought that this was wrong. Their detectives could only solve the case after it happened. The case has not happened. Even if he has the idea of ​​​​killing someone, he should not kill him. Instead, he should use other methods to warn him. If he really wants to kill someone, he can only catch him while he is doing it and then prosecute him for attempted murder.

It's not okay to kill someone without hearing anything about the murder before it happened.

"Minority Report" and "Psychometer" said that they prejudge criminals before the crime occurs and shoot them directly. Justice will never be late again, or even early.

Justice that is delayed is no longer justice. Now that justice has been brought forward, it is a pity that no one is satisfied. It's okay to think that killing people is on your mind, as long as you don't follow through.

After all, one does not care about one’s heart when it comes to deeds, and no one is perfect in the world. Who doesn't feel a little embarrassed? You can't just shoot someone because of your dirty thoughts? As long as you don't implement it, it's not a crime to think about it.

This old woman was worried that justice would be late, so she planned to kill her companions in advance, which was really not a good idea.

This is a treasure hunting plan planned by the two people together, but the old woman and her companions have differences. The old woman just wants to find the treasure and fulfill her father's last wish. But the companion felt that he should use this opportunity to kill several detectives. Although he is also a detective himself, he can no longer restrain his inner desire to commit crimes.

As I keep solving crimes, sometimes I wonder if I can also commit crimes and challenge the law? As a detective who is familiar with various crime processes, can he become an excellent criminal? Many detectives sometimes think so.

"After solving too many cases, you will indeed have the urge to commit crimes. I can understand it." But it was the fat detective Polo who said what was in his heart: "I used to think that if I could solve a case, I would definitely commit one. Until I and the gangster Stings once sneaked into a suspect's house to steal evidence, only to realize that being able to solve a case may not necessarily lead to committing a crime." That time, he and Hastings, as thieves, pretended to be a lock repairman during the day and successfully left a mark on the window. Get off the trap and sneak in smoothly at night. But things went wrong next. Although they found clues, they were also discovered by their master. Hastings sneaked away unfaithfully, while Polo was sent to the police station because he was not good at running.

If he hadn't been good friends with the police chief, Polo would have stayed in the police station for a few days.

"There will be various uncontrollable factors when committing a crime, and solving a crime is just looking back at the process of committing a crime. All uncontrollable factors have become clues." "So, committing a crime and solving a crime are fundamentally different things. The same uncontrollable factors, When committing a crime, it is an obstacle, but when it is solved, it is a clue. Committing a crime and solving a crime are completely opposite, so I advise detectives not to think that just because they can solve a crime, they will definitely be able to commit the crime. Even detectives cannot control the process of committing a crime." Polo understood deeply. My experience is that situations often occur when committing crimes.

Even if a detective can come up with the perfect crime modus operandi, there will still be uncontrollable factors when it comes to actual practice.

"I did not commit a crime. I just wanted to use this opportunity to commit a crime, but I did not commit it at all. I am not guilty." The accomplice said that he would not take the blame: "On the contrary, this old woman attempted murder. She had already poisoned her, but I was lucky enough to be fine.”

"I just want to prevent you from committing a crime, but I don't want justice to be delayed." The old woman also spoke plausibly.

Neither of them thought they were wrong.

Conan was also helpless. If he knew someone was going to kill someone, he would definitely stop it, but it was impossible to kill someone to stop the killing.

"I think this old woman is right. Anyone who has the idea of ​​killing innocent people should be eliminated." Duran suddenly appeared and said.

"Uncle Du, why are you here?" Xiaolan was surprised.

"Because the car rented by Mr. Maoli sounded an alarm, I came immediately to provide support." Dulan said: "This is after-sales service. In fact, I stood at the door for a while and heard your discussion. I think we should advance Crime deterrence.”

"This is impossible." "How is it possible to know the crime in advance?" Kaitou Kidd borrowed the identity of Mouri Kogoro to ask the question. If he could have known about the crime in advance, he, the Phantom Thief, could have retired.

"It can be done. There is a 'psychological measurement' technology that can measure each person's crime value. Once the crime value rises, he can be killed directly." "The principle of this technology is also very simple. It is to collect a thousand top-level criminals. The brains of criminals are connected to form a 'crime value measurement system'. Through the thoughts of a thousand criminals, the criminal psychology index of the entire society can be monitored in real time. As long as there is a fluctuation, they will be killed directly, so that there will be no crime. Now." Duran said that this is the technology in "The Psychometrician".

Use the brains of a thousand criminals to stop more criminals. Of course, in the series, the protagonist is very contradictory. After all, isn't it ironic to allow the criminal's brain to have such great power and control the entire society?

In fact, thieves also have their ways, and the abilities of top criminals are not bad.

Of course, it is the brain of a criminal after all, and it always feels weird to let criminals monitor the operation of society. The protagonist in the original work felt this way, but as an insider, she did not oppose these criminal brains in the end, but became a supporter of the system, because she knew that this society needed a 'measurement system', which indeed reduced crime, although The system is maintained by criminals and there is simply no better alternative. So even if she couldn't accept it, she could only try to maintain it.

The plot of "The Psychometrician" discusses a phenomenon: those who steal hooks will be punished, and those who steal the country will be punished by princes; killing one person is considered a crime, and massacring ten thousand people is considered a hero.

It is also a crime. In the measurement system, as long as the crime value exceeds the dangerous value, ordinary criminals will be killed directly. But the brains of a thousand top criminals are so high that they have become the cornerstone of the country's stability.

They are all criminals, why should they be treated differently? Why should those who steal hooks be punished, and those who steal the country be punished by princes?

The difference between top criminals and ordinary criminals is that top criminals hurt more people, are more cold-blooded, and are more ruthless.

But in fact, as a decision-maker, you have to be cold-blooded and ruthless. As long as you don't favor one and treat others equally, you are a good decision-maker.

Benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom and trust, as long as you master these, you can become a top criminal, and of course, you can also become a qualified decision-maker.

Ordinary criminals obviously cannot meet the requirements of benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom and trust.

So why should those who steal hooks be punished, and those who steal the country be punished by the princes? It is because the hook thief cannot meet the requirements of the thief and cannot attract more people into his distribution relationship.

The thieves have already won over many people and tied them to the chariot of their own interests. We must know that the common benefit of the world is for the great harmony. If everyone in the world becomes a community of interests, it will be a great harmonious society.

This is not easy. Benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom and trust are all indispensable. Without these abilities, even if the country is stolen, it will be overthrown very quickly.

Just look at the thieves of the country in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and you will know that to steal the country, you have to win people's hearts, you have to have a clever name, and you have to have excellent strength, otherwise you will not be able to steal the country.

The three families of Jin State were divided into Jin, and the Tian family of Qi State was replaced by Jiang. These are all famous cases of stealing the country. The Jin Dynasty belonged to the royal family and weakened itself, allowing the six ministers to take over. In the Qi State, the Tian family controlled the economic lifeline. In the end, the economy surpassed the royal family, and they bought people's hearts through big buckets of lending and small buckets of money collection.

One hundred yuan was lent and only ninety-nine yuan was charged. How could everyone not support the Tian family?