Crow's Paradise

Are demons humans from the past?

And humans in Paradise are artificial humans?

So

What is paradise?

Petri dish, culture tank?

Following the perspective of creation and association, Yao Yan bridged the gap between "paradise" and "cultivation tank".

If you start thinking again and think about the corresponding elements of this world and the source of the worldview from the perspective of creation and association, then there is only the last step left.

Find "Paradise".

If paradise is not an entity and has no historical remains, then it may be the real world and a certain history of the "main world".

According to his previous theory, a trial space, the world itself can be divided into two parts.

One part can be described as "setting", which corresponds to the worldview of the spiritual origins, and can also be said to be "origins". These origins are unreasonable.

If those with spiritual origins believe that the world is round, then the world is round; if those with spiritual origins believe that the world is square, then the world will be square.

This is the "framework".

The other part is "continuation", which corresponds to the "setting" based on the worldview of the spiritual originators, as a beginning, and then continued development. These developed things, unlike the "framework", do not have absolute coercion.

Take the previous Sunstone world as an example.

The development of language itself does not happen overnight, and various social influences will leave traces on language.

And through the traces themselves, problems can be discovered.

Those who have not experienced the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China era will not like to use "there is a good person" when speaking.

Linguistically speaking, isolates, agglutinants, and inflectionals will all develop into one another over time. However, the same isolates have differences in word order, usage habits, word origins, allusions, etc. of.

If the isolate has one, two, three, the clinging language has ABC, and the inflected language has 123, then the clinging of the isolated language can be -A, -B or -C, and the inflection of the clinging language can be A1, A2, A3.

These processes of change are just like genetic sequences, and their process of change itself will be recorded in language.

One A1, one B3

This is just a simplified description with most variables removed.

Isolated words will naturally become adherent, but the time is long and short, and the degree of adhesion is also different for which words and sentences.

At this time, if another civilization breaks in through economic exchange or conquest, then the local language will be affected.

Some isolated languages ​​are inflected by foreign language habits after they have completed agglutination.

Some isolates are inflected by foreign language habits just at the beginning or halfway through.

Or conversely, a language completes inflectionalization and is returned to agglutinative.

The language he is accustomed to, such as Isolate Language, has a great impact on the semantics of words and word order.

I love you, you love me, you and I love have different meanings.

A strict structure needs to be adhered to.

But in Japanese, etc., I, you love, you and I love all have the same meaning.

These language habits themselves, the grammar, word meanings, and pronunciation lengths in these languages ​​are all a historical record.

And language usage will also affect people’s habits

If the word expressing judgment is placed at the end of the sentence, such as "I want to kill you, no", then people will be used to listening to the sentence before speaking.

This kind of language habit will make a person's character more patient or more sinister, and his habit of joking will also change.

As the other party to the dialogue, the third party, different situations will also occur.

However, as far as Yao Yan knew, these knowledge were relatively backward theories.

Although it is not outdated, the lack of other theories as a supplement can have a great impact in itself.

A person's thinking habits, a person's memory, and a person's world view are also affected by language habits.

The various things and experiences a person possesses are not isolated.

People are used to simplifying and omitting things that they think are "unnecessary" and "can be omitted."

But what’s even more frightening is that they often don’t know what the simplified standards are when they make simplified behaviors.

This itself is also the "optimal structure" formed by the human body in order to reduce unnecessary energy consumption.

If you have to go over all the nouns in detail every time you think, although it can ensure a relatively high accuracy, it will be time-consuming and laborious.

Survival of the fittest, does it mean that the best survive and the others are eliminated, or does a certain period of excellence survive and the others are eliminated, or is only the worst eliminated and those who are better than him survive?

The fact is that an injured person dropped money when he passed by. When people saw the scene and traced it back, they thought that someone had been robbed of money and injured.

Yao Yan was very cautious.

He knew that if the details of the judgment and origin of "Paradise" were wrong, his understanding of real history would gradually deviate with the step-by-step process.

He needs to find clues that are clear enough.

If we can find the dividing line that can determine whether it is "frame history" or "continuation of history", that would be the best result.

But he won't have any expectations.

The current demons are humans, and the current humans are artificial humans?

A problem arises.

What standards are used to judge "human beings"?

Is it a judgment of origin, or is it a criterion for judgment at this stage?

To use an example, "Emperor".

The earliest emperor is the emperor, aren't the others who appear later the emperor?

If the subsequent emperor is also an emperor, then an invisible presupposition and standard will appear——

"Emperor, are you the only one?"

"Are humans the only ones?"

This question is important.

People are accustomed to simplifying their thinking, logic, and standards.

Black and white, light and dark, high and low.

"Everything except black is white" is not clear enough.

"Everything except light is dark" may be a clearer explanation.

This is a common thinking inertia that "simplification" is rooted in human thinking.

Then, according to the theory of world formation, whether "human beings" are unique may very well be the core point that triggers the worldview conflict in this world.

If the origin is the only one, then this is a world where genes determine everything.

The devil is the "orthodox".

To subvert thinking, habits, and a person's worldview, we must start by subverting his "natural" concepts.

If so, then his choice can be——

Completely destroy the devil.

Going a step further, other species can be turned into humans or demons, completely replacing the position of "human beings".

But what if it's not, but just "has a human appearance or."

"They look almost the same, even if they are human."

Then, Yao Yan should choose to make the humanoid creatures in this world lose their human form.

All the crows raised their heads at the same time.