Crow's Paradise

To put it more simply, it would be better to use an analogy to describe "eating".

In terms of expansion explanation, any outward behavior of "looking for food" or "looking for companions" can be traced back to this situation.

However, this is not "is".

Not "the same" either.

Regarding this doctrine, Yao Yan's memory was not very deep.

There is no conclusive evidence that an effect is an effect or a cause is a cause.

After all, there is also a very common spiral in the evolutionary history of living things.

Let’s use rumors as a ratio.

Once a rumor is born, it will itself breed another rumor.

As for the previous rumor, this second rumor became evidence of the first rumor and helped it stabilize.

People may prefer to use the word "inertia" to describe this spiral structure in which spirals interact with each other.

In this hypothesis, this "combination" at the genetic level, or the functions of "predating" and "absorbing external substances", serve as the origin of everything.

From here, the description of the “cognitive” structure begins.

In this hypothesis, the structure of "cognition" is "pairing."

No, to be more precise, it is to "plan" an outline, and then follow this outline to find the "corresponding" things.

Not a substantial correspondence, but a structural correspondence.

For example, there is a hole in the ground. In order to fill the hole, you have to find various things to put in it.

However, the problem is that to fill the hole, it is not necessary to find soil to fill it.

In other words, as long as the hole can be filled and the conditions of "filling the hole" are met, you can pour it in.

Whether it is sand, stone, metal, leaves, or wood.

This may sound "unbelievable", right?

Shouldn't base pairing be fixed?

Isn’t it determined which group goes with which group?

——Who made the decision?

Again, don’t simply integrate an internal structure composed of countless small structures with complex connections and conflicts into a whole.

It's like "joining forces."

An object on the earth eventually appears to fall downward in the same direction as the influence of gravity, so is it only affected by gravity?

Another example can be taken from humans. People are hungry and want to eat.

What do people eat and what do they not eat?

Chicken, mutton, beef, and pork are all meat and can be eaten as long as they can fill your stomach.

But what about human flesh?

Is the judgment "cannot eat human flesh" a later "revision", or is it based on the action of "eating", excluding human flesh from the diet from the beginning?

Why was human flesh excluded from the diet?

Because it's meat? Or is it because it is human flesh?

Is it the label of “meat” that is being rejected, or is it the label of “human” that is being rejected?

In this conception of cognitive structure, human "consciousness" and human cognition are also a "filler".

If the original driving force of this structure is regarded as the "origin", then human cognition is a construct created to fill the "correspondence hole".

This cognitive construct is people's self-awareness in a general sense.

From the hypothesis of the generation principle of this cognitive structure, to describe the meaning of cognition itself is "existence for the sake of existence."

So, what is the purpose of this thing that exists for the sake of existence?

The former is a description of the structural function, and the latter is the self's assumption of the meaning of self-existence.

However, if it really felt like it was over here, then everything would be much simpler.

But the problem is

This hole itself will continue to create "holes".

What is the raw material for this thing that is filled in because of "correspondence" and "vacancy"?

Did the vacancy disappear because it was filled?

No, this preset "fullness" is itself a vacancy.

Vacancy does not correspond to "full".

In other words, this "vacancy" is closer to the concept of "need".

I need "need".

Not easy to understand?

Let's put it this way, "filling" something is not the "correspondence" it needs.

But "filling things in" is what it needs.

The purpose is to "fill", not to "fill".

When eating, most people will have the thought "I want to be full", but this primitive function itself does not have this set of underlying logic.

It's primitive, it's basic, it's simple.

Its purpose is to "eat".

Endless and without boundaries.

Feel counter-intuitive?

If there are no boundaries, then why don't I feel them?

Gravity is also infinite, but why isn't the world all squeezed together?

This counterexample is actually inappropriate and not a good example.

It's a pity that Yao Yan didn't have enough expressive ability to find an accurate enough example.

"Correspondence" and "vacancy" are a primitive driving force brought by the original structure, forming various vacancies and various "black holes".

However, these "vacancies" continue to stack up and serve as the driving force for the next level, forming new corresponding gaps.

In this process, the first level of "self" participates.

That is the "consciousness" that arises in the first opening.

However, the problem is that "consciousness" itself has "cognitive ability".

However, it is not single in itself. As a suture of many "vacancies", a bunch of materials that are pulled into this first layer of vacancies as fillers, these things themselves also have original driving force.

The "vacancy" cannot be filled.

However, what is filled into the first layer of vacancies has a limited composition, and it will find "correspondences" one by one.

This does not mean that they have found things that can fill their "correspondence", but that as a "integration", they have a vague outline.

They have a general image, their "needs" and their corresponding range have become "smaller".

Becoming "concrete".

There is a "referenceable object".

Yao Yan was more accustomed to calling this stage the "mirror" stage.

Although it is still quite blurry, the "outline has shrunk".

But, in reality, has the “profile” really shrunk?

No, according to this theory, this is just the first level of "consciousness" anchoring a "new correspondence" based on "everything it can recognize".

New vacancies are created.

New holes are created.

Then, the second level of "consciousness" arises.

By analogy, layer after layer of holes, layer after layer of corresponding holes, allow people to gradually have a clear enough cognitive relationship.

To use an example, the initial vacancy could be likened to a black hole "I need to fill it with something," but because there are simply not enough specific criteria, a galaxy is filled in.

As for the galaxy itself, as something filled in, it is affected.

However, unlike the initial driving force, this vacancy became "stabilized" due to the "balance" of gravity.

It's just that this "stability" is also a vague and uncertain standard, and it does not achieve "balance" in many details.

Therefore, it establishes the corresponding relationship between itself and the vacancy as a "balanced" standard.

According to this standard, let your own vacancy draw various star clusters over to achieve a "balance".

And this balance creates a new "vacancy".

One by one, "vacancies" and vague "balances" without clear standards are gradually advancing and progressing, forming various "detailed" needs.

Perhaps it should be the other way around, with the initial driving force being planets and then expanding to black holes.

But whether it is from big to small, or from small to large, "onion" may be a more vivid example.

Human consciousness is not a complete thing, but is made up of layers of things that are constantly involved.

The lowest level, the most core thing, is the vague "correspondence" generated by the original driving force without specific standards.

And in this process of continuous clarity of "consciousness", it is a process of constantly attaching things from the outside world or "oneself" to it.

One of the stages is generally called -

"Sexualized order."