Empire: God System

Seeing that everyone else had left, Kleiber didn't want to leave, nor did he mean to avoid him. So after coming to the balcony, Luther directly raised his question to Kleiber:

"Could it be that you can only see what I am like from the cars I made? This ability sounds incredible."

Facing Arthur's slightly joking inquiry, Kleiber shook his head and smiled, saying:

"I can indeed see part of it. First of all, I know that the cars you make are not made by mechanized assembly lines. This is because every car you make has slight differences. These differences cannot be brought about by mechanized assembly lines. I can see your crafting techniques from the tiny differences in each car, and I can slightly detect your state of mind when making them from the differences in each car."

At this point, Clayber paused, scratched his head and said:

"You may think this is a bit exaggerated. Being able to read thoughts from the slightest perception of machinery sounds inexplicable, but to me it is real.……"

Kleiber's meaning is very obvious. Although he can personally see the slight differences in each car, he also knows that his ability is very special. If not for him, others may not be able to see this small difference. Come out, this kind of specialness is even a fantasy for others.

Although what Kleiber said was very mysterious and sounded nonsense, Luther did not question the other party's intention.

Because when Luther used the Eye of God to observe Kleiber, he had noticed some abnormalities in Kleiber's behavior. For example, he often stroked machines and all kinds of machines. If that was just the case, it would be understandable. It would be understandable for the mechanic to appease the machine soul.

But Kleiber stroked it as if he were stroking something, not like stroking a machine at all. Luther got goosebumps after watching the whole process.

Luther could understand this because of Kleiber's quirks, but since Kleiber gave a relatively reasonable explanation, Luther felt that the behavior and the corresponding explanation could match up, so he naturally believed it to be true.

If we follow this line of thinking, according to Luther's understanding, Kleiber has a talent in the true sense to a certain extent. Going further, it can even be defined as special, as long as But compared to abilities, the upper limit is much lower. In other words, the degree of development of the slight specificity displayed by the other party is too low compared to the true and complete specificity.

Both of these situations are possible. As for which one it is, Luther cannot make a relatively certain judgment based on the information he currently knows. He can only draw conclusions through future observations of Kleiber. Conclusion

"I understand that some people may have that kind of talent and a strong affinity for machinery, that is, they can see many things from cold machinery in more detail, but I don’t think this means anything. Even if you can see from every machine The subtle differences in the car reveal my state of mind, but they don't mean anything

"Just like some writers, there is a certain probability that the works they write are different from the state they present themselves. Some works are extremely sunny and bring people unlimited hope, but their authors may be depressed. patient. Some works that expose reality, criticize ugliness, and awaken people's positive energy may be written by dark and ugly writers themselves. There are some works that are so dark and dark that one will be depressed for a long time after reading them all. The author himself may be an old man who is cheerful all day long. There is simply no way for you to completely confirm the writer's style through his works, let alone use them to judge the writer's status."

Although Luther understood the peculiarity shown by Kleiber and had many speculations about it, he did not agree with the views expressed just now.

"Of course I understand this. There is really no way to read your mental state from those slight differences."

Kleiber nodded in agreement:

"As you said, although we 'readers' cannot fully confirm the character of the writer through the expression of the works, these works can quite accurately reflect your skills, and this is what I value.