Extraordinary understanding: from mathematical emperor to civilized leader

Xu Ning also heard about Mochizuki Shinichi's claim that he had proved the ABC conjecture.

Because this incident was really big at that time, many scholars were involved.

Some people say that Shinichi Mochizuki's proof is fine, but many more say that his proof is vague enough to be believed.

And the reason for all this is that Shinichi Mochizuki's proof process is too outrageous:

His entire paper is six hundred pages long!

Consists of 4 long essays with gradually increasing difficulty.

If only that's all.

He also created a theory in his paper that was difficult for countless people to understand, named "Intercosmic Teichmmler Theory", or IUT theory for short.

What's even more incredible is that he also coined a lot of magical "one-three-zero" terminology in his papers.

For example, the Dark Edge of the Universe, the Hodge Theater, the Alien Arithmetic Homogeneous Structure...

Typical Sakurajima Nakaji no Kaze.

So for such a paper, it is simply impossible for the academic community to admit it.

Not to mention that there are many difficult points in Mochizuki's paper that are difficult to justify.

Some academics asked him to patch the loopholes, but he didn't bother to pay attention, saying that he was right and unwilling to be interviewed.

There is a tendency to go crazy.

As Shinichi Mochizuki's teacher, Professor Faltins neither recognized Shinichi Mochizuki's proof nor denied it.

In his words, he didn't understand.

Shinichi Mochizuki's paper is too long!

And it is not like Xu Ning's paper, although Xu Ning's proof of Hodge's conjecture is also very long, but he uses theories that once existed in academia.

Not only him, but also Perelman, who proved the Poincaré conjecture, used the Ricci curvature flow of the last century.

Mr. Wiles proved the famous Fermat conjecture using the modular form theory of higher-order elliptic curves.

Several of them used theories already in academia, and outsiders could immediately get feedback from them when they saw their proof process.

However, Shinichi Mochizuki spent a full three hundred pages creating a theoretical framework himself, and then used this framework to prove the ABC conjecture.

But he didn't create the math teaching of algebraic geometry. Emperor Grothendieck, his theory is like an old lady's shroud, smelly and long.

Professor Faltins, who is Shinichi Mochizuki's teacher and known as Grothendieck's successor, can't understand it, let alone anyone else.

So his proof has been reprehensible.

Xu Ning said: "In the evening, you send his paper to my mailbox, I will take a closer look." "

Professor Faltins smiled when he heard this: "Okay, but the outside world has not given a final conclusion on his proof for several years, so you don't need to be in a hurry, just look at it when you think about it." "

After separating from Professor Faltins, Xu Ning went to the auditorium to watch a one-hour report by Professor Owei.

After seeing it, it was already dark when I walked out of the auditorium.

Xu Ning went to the restaurant he had found before for a night's meal, and then returned to the hotel.

In the room, Xu Ning turned on the computer and checked the mailbox regularly.

A new message appears in the mailbox.

It was sent by Professor Faltins.

Xu Ning clicked on it and began to download Shinichi Mochizuki's six-hundred-page paper.

Taking advantage of the download time, Xu Ning poured himself a cup of warm water and took a slow sip.

After a while, the paper was finally downloaded.

Xu Ning sat back in the chair and immediately clicked on it to check.

Although Professor Faltins said that Xu Ning did not need to rush to see, he could take his time, anyway, several years have passed, there is no need to rush for a while, but Xu Ning feels that it doesn't matter.

Because it is much easier to verify whether a paper is correct or wrong than to prove an international mathematical conjecture!

What about even six hundred pages? (Read violent novels, just go to Feilu Fiction Network!) ）

When you have a brain that goes beyond a quantum computer, the so-called quantity is not a problem at all.

Xu Ning looked at ten lines and quickly turned the pages, and the content of each page was imprinted in his brain.

An hour later.

Xu Ning read the paper, which was described as almost incomprehensible, in its entirety.

He leaned back in his chair and closed his eyes and thought for a moment.

The alarm clock in the room was ticking.

At a certain moment, Xu Ning suddenly opened his eyes 0.....

"He was wrong!"

Xu Ning glanced at the time, and it was exactly ten o'clock in the evening.

He decisively opened the mailbox and then wrote back to Professor Faltins:

"I have read Shinichi Mochizuki's paper and am quite sure that his derivation process is wrong!

His thesis consisted of four papers, and according to his derivation, the first two papers were fine, but the inference 3.12 in the third paper was problematic.

You know, we often use the word inference to refer to secondary derivative theories of those major theories.

However, corollary 3.12 is at the heart of the entire ABC conjecture proof, and if it does not hold, the entire proof is absolutely untenable.

Shinichi Mochizuki proved the inequality corresponding to the related elliptic curve in inference 3.12.

If this proof holds, the ABC conjecture is proved.

But the proof requires a comparison of two sets of real numbers that are transformed into part of a ring composed of some elements of six different sets of real numbers.

In addition, it is necessary to prove what the relationship of each set on the ring is to its own neighboring sets , and in order to do this, it is necessary to understand the relationship between the measures of different sets.

In Shinichi Mochizuki's work, the various measurement standards are compatible with each other.

But as we traversed along the ring, I found that we eventually came across a measure that looked different from the other measures.

This situation is similar to the famous Escher staircase – you keep climbing up, and at the end you find that you are back to square one.

The incompatibility of this spatial measure means that the final inequality does not compare two quantities that should really be compared.

But if the adjustment proof is made so that the spatial measures are compatible with each other, then the inequality will lose its meaning.

Faced with this dilemma, Shinichi Mochizuki did not give a solution, but deliberately vague, so all his subsequent inferences were based on existing errors.

Therefore, his proof is wrong.

Above. "

After editing the email, Xu Ning clicked send, then stood up and stretched.

"Six hundred pages, another busy day... Go to bed! "。

Người mua: sabmado