Extraordinary understanding: from mathematical emperor to civilized leader

At night, Xu Ning and Professor E Wei got on the plane back to the magic capital together.

Before getting on the plane, Professor Ewei also specially talked with Xu Ning about Mochizuki Xinyi, and comforted Xu Ning not to take this matter to heart.

Among them, Professor Shan Fan of Mizuki also said: "Mochizuki Shinichi is a piece of cowhide candy that can't be shaken off and disgusting, you don't have to pay attention to him at all."

When he first published his paper, some people questioned his vague statements in the proof process, but he did not revise it at all, saying instead that they were red-eyed and jealous of his achievements.

Another sentence that impressed me was that he claimed that scholars were unfamiliar or even uncomfortable with new methods of dealing with traditional mathematical problems.

I wanted to laugh when I heard it, is he a mathematical giant, the so-called new methods and theories he created, in addition to himself, a few people can understand, those exaggerated middle two words, has dissuaded countless people. "

The professors were unanimous in their displeasure with Mochizuki, believing that he was just a dreamer immersed in his imagination.

The best way to deal with this paranoia is not to touch him and pay attention to him.

Xu Ning didn't say anything when he heard this, but just nodded ~ his head.

And when Xu Ning and the others were already thousands of meters in the air, the matter of "Xu Ning questioning the proof of Mochizuki Xin's ABC conjecture" was finally further fermented, and it was spread on the Internet - boiling.

Western netizens didn't argue about anything, they just watched the fun.

But Sakurajima's netizens are different, they can be said to be excited.

Shinichi Mochizuki is their top mathematician in China and is also famous internationally, so he has always been their pride.

They also consistently believed that Shin Mochizuki's proof of the ABC conjecture was infallible.

That's why academics have a saying: "In Sakurajima, the ABC problem is a theorem, and outside Sakurajima, the ABC problem is still a conjecture." "

This shows how much the Sakurajima mathematical community and ordinary netizens trust and worship Shinichi Mochizuki.

So when they saw Xu Ning questioning Mochizuki Xinyi, they hardly thought about it, and immediately thought that Xu Ning was deliberately looking for fault.

"Although Xu Jun proved the Hodge conjecture, he can't casually say that Professor Mochizuki's argument is problematic, this is the result of his eight years of hard work, how many eight years is there in a person's life?"

"Do you still want to call that man Xu Jun, he's just a grandstanding clown, Xia Guoren, heh, it's always so unbearable."

"I have always liked Xu Sang and always watched "Metamorphosis", but after this incident, his image in my heart was greatly tarnished, and he became a person who can only take words.

Six hundred pages! I don't say reading a thesis, just reading a famous novel, and it takes two or three days to read six hundred pages, so how did Xu Sang read Professor Shinichi Mochizuki's paper in less than a day, and found out the so-called loopholes without thinking time? "

"We must boycott "Metamorphosis", boycott Xu Ning, he is not worthy of our respect, if anyone dares to speak for him, he is a traitor!"

“......"

Some Sakurajima netizens finally felt that they were not addicted to scolding on their own Internet, and they also specifically turned to Xia Guo's Internet, frantically brushing Xu Ning as an academic liar and so on.

For this kind of behavior, how could the netizens of Xia Guo endure it?

So they began to frantically angrily scare the Sakurajima netizens who came in, and after spraying each other with autism, they went out again and ran to the outside net to frantically scare Sakurajima netizens.

The quarrel between the two sides was intense.

Therefore, when Xu Ning and others got off the plane and walked out of the airport, they were immediately surrounded by many reporters and media.

They rushed forward and extended their microphones towards Xu Ning:

"Xu Ning, Professor Mochizuki Shinichi disagrees with your evaluation and thinks that you are making a big fuss, what do you think about this?"

"Xu Ning, Sakurajima netizens are excited, they all criticize you for not having academic ethics, what do you want to say to them?" (Read violent novels, just go to Feilu Fiction Network!) ）

"Xu Ning, did you really finish reading Shinichi Mochizuki's paper and find out the error in less than a day, or did you read it before, and this statement is just a rumor?"

"Do you really think that Professor Shinichi Mochizuki's proof process is wrong, or is it like Shinichi Mochizuki said, you look at it with prejudice from beginning to end?"

“......"

Facing the reporters who gathered around, Xu Ning said: "Don't squeeze, I only answer once." "

Everyone stopped and looked at him with curiosity and excitement.

Xu Ning said: "I don't say whether Mochizuki Shinichi's paper is correct.

Just the fact that his paper is six hundred pages long is a big problem.

Let me give you a simple example, when Perelman proved the Poincaré conjecture, his work had a short "method verification", that is, his method can quickly obtain some interesting and extraordinary conclusions in the corresponding field.

For example, on page five of his paper, he already gives a completely new interpretation of the Ricci flow: he sees the Ricci flow as a gradient flow, and this is a very promising approach.

On page seven, he uses this explanation to build a very wonderful theorem for Ricci flows.

Although this theorem is still thousands of miles away from finally proving the Poincaré conjecture, it is a novel and interesting result in itself.

That's why experts in the field quickly decided that there was a lot of "good stuff" in this article.

Now that we look back at the method used by Shinichi Mochizuki, the shortest "method verification" is more than three hundred pages of proof of the ABC conjecture.

And the theoretical system he used to construct more than three hundred pages earlier can only be used to prove the ABC conjecture, and this system cannot derive any sub-methods to prove other conclusions, which is undoubtedly a very evil and ridiculous thing!

This, combined with his apparent loopholes and ambiguity in inference 3.12, is enough to show that his thesis is very problematic.

I said all this, hoping that he would be self-aware and take the initiative to publicly apologize to me! "

After speaking, Xu Ning no longer had a chance for the reporters and left on his own.

Người mua: sabmado