From University Lecturer to Chief Academician

a week later.

The allocation funds of the Science Foundation have been in place, and the allocation speed is still very fast, probably because of the urging of the physics laboratory.

Early grants and late grants are the same for the Office of Superconductivity. Anyway, it's all the funding targets for this year, so it doesn't make sense to delay the allocation of funds.

The funds are in place.

The physics laboratory began to prepare for the experiment and purchased a large number of materials needed for the experiment.

At the same time, the experiment was about to begin.

This time, more core personnel participated in the experiment.

Mainly divided into two teams.

The first team is the personnel involved in the project in the physics laboratory, including Xiang Qiansheng, He Yi, Xiao Xinyu, Yan Jing, and Zhao Chuanxin.

The other team was researchers from Factory 244, including Liu Yunli, Ruan Weiping, Xue Chang, and Wang Qiang.

Because the theory has been fully prepared, Wang Hao directly explained the work, and selected three kinds of metals for experiments in multiple directions.

The meeting also discussed the selected metals, and finally finalized lead, mercury, and tin. The main consideration was the cost issue. The three metals are not expensive, and the superconducting critical temperature is also acceptable. Among them, the critical temperature of tin is the lowest, only 3.722K. Lead has the highest critical temperature of 7.193K.

Then there is the experimental assignment.

The team of Factory 244 has already moved here. The base is only a hundred kilometers away from Xihai City. The transportation and communication are relatively convenient. Their equipment is also very complete, no worse than a physics laboratory. As long as there is enough funds, the experiment can be completed.

The projects of the two teams are merged, and the funds are managed in a unified manner.

Wang Hao directly assigned the experimental tasks. The three metals had to be tested six times, and they were divided in half. Each team was responsible for three experiments.

Before the official start of the experiment announcement, he still emphasized the data problem, "The experimental data is the most important, especially the temperature of the exciting AC field must have accurate values, and all data must have ultra-high precision..."

Wang Hao also talked about a problem in particular, "There may be a problem in the experiment. Everyone must pay special attention to it. When the superconducting critical temperature is not reached, the intensity of the AC gravity field may be higher."

"The likelihood of that happening is not high."

"If it appears, you must pay attention to the timely value, so during the experiment, you must be more serious and write down all the real-time data..."

...

What Wang Hao said was a bit unbelievable.

They have found that when the superconducting temperature is approaching, the AC gravity field will be activated, but the intensity is not high, so of course, when the superconducting state is reached, the intensity of the AC gravity field is the highest.

Now Wang Hao said that it is possible to meet the previous intensity even higher, which makes other people a little incomprehensible, but they didn't question it, but just remembered it in their hearts.

Wang Hao specifically mentioned it because similar situations may appear in his analysis.

The probability of a similar situation occurring in a single-dielectric metal is very small, but there is still a little possibility, especially because I am worried that this situation will affect the experimental process.

In fact, it's like pinching an orange with your hands. The orange is completely crushed, and a lot of juice is spilled out, but if you only compare it in one direction, maybe more juice will be sprayed out before the orange explodes.

This situation is possible and is a very important signal in research.

Because the probability of occurrence is relatively small, Wang Hao just mentioned it and didn't pay special attention to it.

The experiment officially begins.

The physics laboratory is busy from top to bottom, and they plan to complete all the experiments within ten days.

This is definitely a process of quickly consuming funds, throwing out 20 to 30 million in ten days, and it also cheers up everyone in the laboratory. They all feel that every minute and every second will consume a lot of funds.

Everyone takes their work very seriously.

When conducting experiments, they became more serious, and the meticulousness was not enough to describe. Many people made records and calculations, and they did it several times in a row to confirm.

He Yi is in charge of coordinating the experiment.

Looking at the high cost of materials like running water, every time an experiment is carried out, it feels like bone cutting and flesh cutting, grinning distressedly, and complaining to Wang Hao, "The funds are spent too fast, such experiments, don't you? Do it once and it will be millions.”

"The problem is, you can't miss it once."

Wang Hao is very indifferent. The cost is indeed fast, but the results are also very remarkable. He added content step by step, and the microscopic shape is more perfect. "I have tried to reduce the number of times as much as possible."

"Six times is the lowest value, and only two experiments are carried out for each metal. Normally, I think each metal needs more than ten comparison experiments."

"Unfortunately, the funds are too small..."

There are errors in the experimental data. The two experiments are combined for comparison, and some values ​​are half-analyzed to make the data more accurate.

More similar experiments are done, and the data must be more accurate. Only two experiments are conducted, and the number of experiments is still too small.

But the most important thing is the trend and the method. The conclusion must be deduced, and then it can be gradually improved, and he does not need to improve it by himself in the follow-up.

As long as the results are made public, there will definitely be a large number of institutions doing the same type of research.

Research does not require AC gravity experiments, but superconductivity experiments in the same field, and the reverse deduction of recorded data can make the values ​​more accurate.

This is a digital correction process.

Any established physical constant is not perfected for the first time. In the following decades or hundreds of years, there will be a lot of related research, and the constant will be gradually corrected, and finally a very accurate value will be obtained.

For example, the gravitational constant.

Newton discovered the law of universal gravitation, but even he himself did not know the value of the gravitational constant G.

The law of universal gravitation was discovered more than 100 years ago, but the constant of universal gravitation still had no accurate results. It was not until more than 100 years later that the British Cavendish used a torsion balance to measure this constant skillfully.

Later, with the development of science and technology, the constant measured by Cavendy was finely revised.

The same is true for the current 'elemental superconducting critical temperature constant'. They only need two experiments to perfect the microscopic form and determine the approximate value of the constant.

that's it.

...

Nine days later.

The last AC gravity experiment using 'tin' as the material is over.

Everyone in the lab let out a sigh of relief.

Wang Hao also obtained the latest data and made a final analysis, and then, together with Lin Bohan, continued to improve the microscopic morphology.

Then start doing calculations.

Because there is already enough data, and it only involves some topological calculations, the calculation work is relatively simple. The two of them made calculations separately, and finally compared the calculated values.

"0.0124834."

"Consistent!"

Seeing the exact same values, smiles appeared on their faces.

Afterwards, computer-aided calculations were performed, and the same value was obtained.

Only then can it be determined.

The experimental work is over.

The other core personnel wrote reports on the experiments, and their experiments gained a lot. Just like what Wang Hao said, the strength of the AC gravity field will be higher if the experiments are performed with low-temperature materials.

The same is true.

Experiments using metal tin as the material have detected the highest AC gravity strength - 24%.

The intensity of the exchange gravity field is amazing, and it is even said that it is completely worthwhile to spend more than 20 million yuan just to increase the intensity of the exchange gravity field.

Wang Hao started to write a thesis with his head down.

Everyone else knew that the experiment was to study the superconducting mechanism, and only a few people such as Liu Yunli and He Yi knew how to do the research.

Lin Bohan participated in the shaping of the microscopic shape, and also participated in the calculation of the "element superconducting critical temperature constant", but he didn't know much about the experiment.

Wang Hao is the only one who understands everything, and he led the experiment.

So the thesis can only be written by him.

He wrote two papers, one is a detailed report, including the content of the AC gravity experiment, and the other ignores the AC gravity experiment, and only analyzes a general formula based on the study of superconducting microscopic morphology.

The name of the column is called the law of elemental superconductivity.

This law can be used to calculate the superconducting temperature of a single element, but the calculation of the relevant parameters is very complicated, and the various characteristics of the elements need to be embedded in the logic of the new geometry, and then the values ​​can be substituted into the calculation.

However, being able to calculate is already quite amazing.

It took Wang Hao two days to sort out the results, and another week to complete all the papers.

He first submitted it to the higher-level department for review, and confirmed that the "simplified version" of the paper did not involve the exchange of gravity field experiments, but the purely theoretical content could be published.

After the approval of the higher authorities, it was submitted to the "Nature" magazine.

...

There are three most famous and influential academic journals in the world, namely "Nature", "Science" and "Cell".

"Nature" magazine, being one of them, is naturally very remarkable. They may have the most educated editorial team in the world.

An ordinary Ph.D. degree is not enough to work in Nature. If you want to be an editor of Nature, you must have done postdoctoral research and achieved certain scientific achievements in related fields.

Campbell used to be an associate professor in the Department of Physics at the University of Manchester. Later, he thought that he was not suitable for scientific research, so he put down his job and became an editor of the "Nature" magazine.

As it turned out, editing was a good fit for him.

Campbell has been working for more than ten years and has already achieved the position of editor-in-chief. He will be very focused on reviewing each manuscript.

It's not easy.

Every year, more than 10,000 high-level papers are submitted to Nature, and there are hundreds of physics papers, which are only "high-level" papers, and there are countless low-level and ordinary papers.

On this day, Campbell was reviewing manuscripts normally, and suddenly saw a paper on superconductivity submitted, called "The Law of Superconductivity and Critical Constants".

He glanced at it and was startled.

The law of superconductivity?

critical constant?

Putting these words together is absolutely amazing, and because they are so amazing, ordinary manuscripts can be put directly into the trash can when they see them.

Just like submitting world-famous conjecture proofs to top journals, there have always been many similar papers, but more than 99.9% of them are meaningless.

However, out of the principle of caution, Campbell took another look, and then he was attracted by the author's name.

"Yeah, Wang Hao?"

"This name seems familiar? From the physics laboratory of Xihai University in China? Xihai University, Wang Hao..."

"The youngest Fields winner!"

Campbell's eyes widened suddenly, he reacted and quickly downloaded the paper.

Such an important research paper, if it is the research of other small institutions, simply ignore it, but adding Wang Hao's name is different. Can the contribution of the Fields winner be deleted at will?

Even if you can't figure out why a Fields winner will submit a physics paper to "Nature", you must read the content.

Soon Campbell was drawn to the content.

It said that a series of experiments were carried out to explain the phenomenon of superconductivity in the way of establishing a "microscopic form", and completed a column formula.

"Using this formula, and the constants mentioned above, combined with the analysis of the microscopic morphological framework, can the superconducting critical temperature of a single element be calculated?"

"How can this be!"

"If it's true, wouldn't the mechanism logic of superconductivity be cracked?"

Subconsciously, Campbell didn't believe it, but considering that it was the youngest Fields winner's thesis, he continued to submit the thesis.

The paper was quickly in the hands of editor-in-chief Magdalena Skipper.

As the editor-in-chief of "Nature", Magdalena Skipper is rarely responsible for reviewing manuscripts, and the manuscripts that can be sent to her are very rare.

Therefore, Magdalena Skipper will attach great importance to the papers submitted by the next level, because each one must be a major research.

Magdalena Skipper had the same reaction as Campbell when she saw the content of the paper. Like this kind of paper, it is impossible to determine whether it is true or not just by looking at it.

She immediately contacted an expert in related fields, Professor Semus Aiwat from Oxford University.

Semus Ewat is an expert in condensed matter physics and an invited reviewer for the journal Nature.

After viewing the paper, Semus Ewat was also very shocked by the content. He tried to understand the "microscopic shape" and wanted to make calculations based on it. Later, he found that it involved mathematical topology problems, because it involved reviewing The manuscript was kept confidential, and she contacted Magdalena Skipper to talk about her needs.

Magdalena Skipper then contacted Steven Davis, a mathematician in the field of topology.

Steven Davis and Samuel Watt got together to do calculations, because the content was so shocking, they even calculated continuously for seven hours, using the methods, formulas and constants mentioned above, to continuously calculate aluminum, Superconducting values ​​of tungsten and zinc.

Comparing the determined values ​​again, it was found that the deviation was less than one percent.

"Zinc, is also correct!"

"We have done three calculations in a row, and there is no problem. I believe that other superconducting metals are also fine. In other words, is this true?"

"Is there really a so-called law of superconductivity?"

"The superconducting properties of elements can be calculated, so compounds and organic molecules can also be calculated in the future. Isn't the mechanism of superconductivity equal to cracking?"

"I am now very sure that this is definitely the most significant progress in the field of superconductivity in decades, and it is even more amazing than the work of Badin, Cooper and Xu Ruifu!"

"This is a Nobel-level achievement..."

Steven Davis and Semus Aywart looked at each other with deep shock in their eyes.

They know that as long as the paper is published, the influence will definitely be huge.

A new round of superconductivity competition in the physics world is coming soon!

(seeking a monthly ticket)