Full-time Artist

In fact, Leng Guang's reading speed is not fast, and he also lost a lot of effort in buying books.

His delay was enough for the first batch of readers of Murder on the Orient Express to write a lot of book reviews and even ignite some topics.

In fact.

The real response started from the evaluation given by the first batch of readers, and a certain reasoning forum became the first online platform to explode!

The reasoning forum is a gathering place for reasoning fans.

The number of **** reasoning fans is not low!

It was the reader's expectation that had not been disappointed by the content of Murder on the Orient Express after the Inference Society and Carter had called and confirmed it; it was also the almost contented moan and groan that the inference fan made after getting the ultimate satisfaction.

Huh huh!

Countless posts spring up like bamboo shoots after a rain!

Perhaps no post can represent everyone's mood.

Everyone has different feelings, but everyone's shock to this novel is the same!

"I thought I was watching a traditional reasoning. Chu Kuang was writing a narrative, and I was deceived twice. This time I was thinking, no matter how traditional Chu Kuang’s plot is, I believe it must be a gorgeous narrative. Quite, I just knelt when I saw the end... Chu Kuang really started to write traditional reasoning!"

This comment is highly liked!

Just as Lin Yuan planned.

His works can be narrative or traditional, between fiction and reality, so that readers will not see the end and guess the answer!

In the following posts, likes and replies are also not low.

"After reading this novel, I began to believe that "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling" is really Chu Kuang's ridicule and alert to the narrative, and then suddenly I feel a little sympathetic to Teacher Leng Guang, you are fine with him.

"This question has exceeded the outline!"

"When I saw Poirot reveal the truth in one breath, I can't say an exaggeration. When I learned that the murderer killed the victim with a single knife, my eyeballs almost exploded. I really got a numb scalp and goose bumps! "

"Carter's preface didn't lie to me! Godly work! Blow!"

"Before I read it, I thought the score for mystery novels was slightly higher. After reading it, I wondered, this score is indeed lower? This is a textbook-level mystery novel. Hey!"

"Polo Polo! I absolutely love this pineapple!"

"Hahaha Hapoluo's name appeared, probably because Chu Kuang wanted to eat pineapple."

"Sorry, Chu Kuang is a god!"

"Sorry, I have a prejudice against Chu Kuang because of the narrative. After reading this new book, I am convinced and the ending is very healing. I have always hoped that in this filthy world, in a corner where the law can't shine or don't want to shine, there will be an invisible Raising the sword of trial, like these thirteen so-called murderers, when seeing Poirot’s decision and the last few lines, my heart feels extremely warm, even though I can’t do anything, I’m an insignificant fellow, I I am still willing to use my trivial five-star evaluation to express my respect for this behavior and this understanding."

"The victim is the perpetrator. The thirteen victims... are shocked. With the final turn, Poirot is handsome! The war hymn is already in my mind! How about using "Overture of the Dead" for bgm?"

"2333, Chu Kuang has Xianyu to let Xianyu write a song."

"Poirot is the first detective in the history of reasoning to spare a prisoner, right? At least this is the first time I have seen this writing...maybe it will be controversial, but I want to tell Chu Kuang, well done!"

"..."

Tipolo was repeated in the post.

Poirot's decision has been discussed repeatedly.

Someone cut out the text in the novel and said when Poirot gave two choices:

[Everything is either right or wrong, and you...]

He was silent for a long time before he said this sentence in confusion: [I can't make a judgment. 】

He left it to others to choose.

When everyone chose the first conclusion that the murderer was not guilty, Poirot took off his hat and bowed announcing that he had withdrawn from the case and slowly turned and left in the snow.

What is good and what is evil?

This is the first time Poirot can't distinguish but has fascinated countless readers!

Everyone seems to see the lonely figure walking forward in the snow, walking and thinking...

In fact, readers who have seen "Roger's Mystery" are very clear about how proud and principled Poirot is.

Everyone is accustomed to Poirot's wisdom and godly judgment!

It's incredible to get him to say "I can't make a judgment."

As if he finally withdrew from the case.

Because it is unbelievable, readers can feel Poirot's suffering and choice!

At this moment, Poirot has become a great detective recognized by countless people!

You know, "World Famous Detective" is a setting given to Poirot by the author of the novel.

The author's pen can be arbitrarily set in the novel, such as the most handsome man in the world, the most beautiful woman in the world, and so on.

Third-rate writers set up their own lust.

As soon as the top writers, stories and settings are released, the readers collectively climax, as if there is such a person.

This is called pen strength.

Therefore, it is not easy for readers to admit that "Poirot is a world-famous great detective", and Chu Kuang did it easily——

Two novels are enough.

Use "Roger's Mystery" to lay the foundation and foreshadowing.

Opened word of mouth and recognition with "Murder on the Orient Express".

Poirot’s story may continue in the future, but at this moment, Poirot, the famous detective who let go of the murderer, has already ushered in the popularity of readers!

of course.

Guessing enthusiasts are also taken care of, as this comment says:

"Never guess the routine of the old thief Chu Kuang! The most hateful thing is that the old thief Chu Kuang vowed to give extremely complicated settings, and even listed the diagram of the carriage and the timetable of the characters' actions. After racking my brains and drawing a piece of paper, I suddenly threw out his newly invented impossible crime mode!!"

Yes.

Many readers tried to find out the truth one step earlier than the detectives when reading "Murder on the Orient Express", which is a great hobby of reasoning lovers reading such books.

But when everyone saw the end and was shocked, they were all dumbfounded.

Did you foul?

Chu Kuang has completed a new reasoning mode!

The murderer turned out to be 13 people!

Of course, all the passengers in the carriages worked together to commit crimes, helped each other to cover, and provided alibi, which directly resulted in all testimony being false.

Who can think of this! ?

Isn't the normal mindset that there is only one murderer?

Occasionally, there are only two or three people who commit crimes in partnership, right?

But in this novel, all the conventional reasoning methods are wrong, and the ending is simply complete! member! good! people!

At the same time, all! member! fierce! hand!

This is the same as seeing the narrative for the first time, and no one can guess the murderer anyway, Chu Kuang’s "Murder on the Orient Express", this is another brand new reasoning mode!

Basically impossible to guess!

So after reading it, it’s hard to think about it!

Not to mention, until the answer was revealed, everyone instinctively thought that what Chu Kuang wrote was narrative.

The media's gimmicks have been hit.

Chu Kuang and Leng Guang’s literary battle, the narrative and traditional duel.

As a result, as soon as Chu Kuang's new book came out, everyone found out when they saw their heads, ah, this product was sincerely teasing us. This time, like the one written by Leng Guang, it belongs to the category of traditional reasoning!

Even the mode of murder in the secret room is almost the same!

"I feel that Chu Kuang is really the writer who can tease readers the most, but I was teased so easily."

"Chu Kuang pioneered the narrative, but Chu Kuang never said that he could only narrate the sly. He was stubborn. He knew that everyone had habitual thinking, but he didn’t explain the type of writing this time, but because he didn’t explain, so I was stunned when I discovered that this is a traditional reasoning and it almost subverts the traditional reasoning model at the same time!"

"As expected of an old thief."

"The old thief is playing frantically with our feelings! He must be hiding somewhere to laugh!"

"The one who was played the most miserable was obviously Leng Guang, who dragged Chu Kuang to the duel, but Chu Kuang defeated Leng Guang with the traditional reasoning that Leng Guang was best at."

"This is equivalent to Chu Kuang defeating Leng Guang with Leng Guang's best martial arts, which is a bit embarrassing."

"Distressed cold light, although this product loves to spray, but people do not open their mouths, and the spray is basically reasonable and well-founded. This time, it is really bad luck."

"This wave of Chu Kuang has also hit the face of anti-narrative readers~www.wuxiaspot.com~ Before the "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling" came out, not many people complained that Chu Kuang would be a narrative? , I want to pull Chu Kuang off the horse, but now Chu Kuang tells everyone clearly: Brother's traditional reasoning is even better than that of sly."

"..."

This time it is not brain supplement and over-interpretation.

Lin Yuan really thinks this way.

He didn't want to leave everyone with the impression that he could only tell the story.

Therefore, traditional reasoning must be used this time, and it must be a work that is sufficiently explosive.

Now, this work really exploded!

Traditional reasoning can also bring forth new ideas, and write a murder mode that all employees cooperate!

It's a trick in a trick!

It directly swollen all the inference faces that had been disdainful to Chu Kuang before.

Just like some readers commented, who would have thought that Chu Kuang's traditional reasoning was even better than the syrianism!

There was a black vote for Chu Kuang before, and one was counted as one, and he was collectively punished in front of the "Orient Express Murder".

And the aftermath of this explosion not only shocked readers, but also shocked countless authors in the reasoning circle...

You know, reasoning writers are the people most sensitive to reasoning.

Readers are just admiring the subtlety of this story. The reasoning writers clearly understand how difficult it is to create such a story!

"Chu Kuang is too evil!"

On this day, after reading "Murder on the Orient Express" as well, someone in a group of reasoning writers sighed with emotion.

In the group, all are +1.