future game space

If you feel that posting a book review can make you feel better, I don’t mind getting scolded a few times (as long as you don’t use bad words, clay figures are also very angry, if you scold me, don’t blame me for scolding you back). I wrote the book

, of course I already had a plan on how to write it.

Some people say that there are many unreasonable things in this book. For example, the protagonist just spent 900 points after getting 1,000 points in "Sword of Immortal". This is actually explained in the book. Single-player plot missions are just like playing private servers to earn points.

It's easy. The protagonist is a modern person. Why doesn't he use points to make his family's life better? How would he know that the total opportunity in the game space would suddenly intervene? Would he suddenly switch to playing a game like "Smart Network Game" that eliminates cheating?

For example, in the case of "Excalibur", except for the protagonist, everyone else is from the future world. It is normal not to understand "The Swordsman". Take today as an example, can you understand some ancient history from two thousand years ago?

?Some of them have never heard of it, right? Moreover, the people who covet the 'Excalibur' are all martial arts people. I did not write in the book that some players covet that thing. If it is unreasonable, it is the future.

Those players know that the evil-fighting sword manual is in Xiangyang Lane, Fuzhou, but there is nothing they can do about it. If it is really written in a reasonable way, what else is there to see in this book?

Writing a book is about the word "pleasure", so the protagonist is always taking advantage. Reading is also about the word "pleasure". For readers who say the book is rubbish, you can naturally click "X" if you feel uncomfortable. If you want to vent your dissatisfaction before clicking "X"

, of course you can post some civilized complaints in the book review area, and if that makes you happy, I also think that my role is still very big, it can make people depressed and comfortable at the same time.

Whether or not to delete a book review depends on the sub-moderators. Generally, if they don’t scold me, I won’t delete it. Although I will be unhappy, I will make myself feel better when writing the book.

There are also things suggested by readers. There are many suggestions that I have thought about in advance, and they naturally coincide with each other. If there are good suggestions, I will think about them one by one and may adopt them.

As for stallions, let’s not talk about them for now. It’s not wrong for a man to be romantic, as long as he’s not obscene. Of course, he won’t jump on a female like crazy when he sees one. At least there will be some foreshadowing.

Finally... Hey, it's the same old thing, if you didn't vote red, vote quickly! Otherwise, cover your anus tightly before going to bed at night!

The results of the new book are very good, and I am very grateful to everyone for their support.

Today is Friday, and I will still write 50,000 words. In the future, I will increase or decrease chapters as much as possible. I may write 3,000 words in one chapter, and I will publish three to four chapters a day, but the number of words will still not be high.

What a big fluctuation.

In short, voting more red votes is good for physical and mental health.

In addition, are there any kind-hearted book friends who are willing to help me drown out those few book reviews?