Heads Up Hollywood

In this case, Michael Jackson was charged with a total of four major crimes: rape, attempted rape, providing alcohol to minors and conspiracy.

The so-called crime of conspiracy refers to Michael Jackson's conspiracy to kidnap the boy's family (the plaintiff) in order to clear his name.

For example, the BBC documentary "Living with Michael Jackson" caused a lot of negative controversy after it was broadcast. In order to fight back, Jackson's team invited the boy's family to participate in the filming.

The boy's family accused Michael Jackson of kidnapping and imprisoning them, so that the picture of their family full of praise for Michael Jackson appeared in the film. And claimed that Michael Jackson sexually assaulted the boy on the night the filming was completed.

During the court questioning, the boy's sister came forward and became a witness for the prosecution.

She said that their words in the film are all scripted and arranged in advance, which can be seen in the end of the video, and they hold the manuscript in their hands.

However, in the film Michael Jackson fought back, the video clip of the boy's family saying good things about Jackson was not included. When prosecutors found the film at the videographer's home, it was untouched.

For such an irrelevant film, Michael Jackson did not hesitate to kidnap the boy's family and threaten them to shoot, but he did not use this part of the material in the end. Why?

The prosecution's statement is too unreasonable!

In addition, the plaintiff claimed that they acted according to the "script" written by Michael Jackson's German manager Diat Wizner, but is this the case?

Diat Wizner's English sucks!

I can't even speak clearly, let alone write a "script" in English.

...

Another scene.

Michael Jackson's lawyer took out an American adult magazine "The Attic: The Edge of Derailment". This is what the prosecution found under Michael Jackson's bed.

Lawyer asks boy: "Did Michael Jackson show you this magazine?"

Boy: "I've seen it!"

Lawyer: "Are you sure it's the magazine?"

Boy: "Yes!"

Well, the facts are clear.

The lawyer then clarified to the judge and jury that the magazine was published in August 2003 and that the last time the plaintiffs left Neverland was in March 2003.

The time is wrong!

The court was in an uproar.

...

Another scene.

The boy's parents are divorced.

In the divorce proceedings, the boy's sister accused his father of sexually assaulting him and illegal imprisonment. Then, the monitoring rights of her and her brother belonged to the mother.

Coincidentally, the same allegations were made against Michael Jackson.

The lawyer questioned this, but the boy's sister's answer was full of mistakes.

Compared with the court record of that divorce lawsuit, it was full of loopholes. In the end, I could only reluctantly prevaricate with the reasons of "I was young at that time" and "I didn't know".

But in fact, if she was really sexually assaulted by her father, it would be a painful memory for a lifetime, and it would be impossible to forget it. Especially when she was crying in court, trying to win the sympathy of the jurors, the jurors turned their heads impatiently.

If this kind of obvious inconsistency happened to an adult, there would be no need for this case to be tried again.

The case can be closed immediately!

Dare to play tricks in court?

...

Another scene.

The lawyer asked the boy: "Your family stayed at Neverland Ranch for a few weeks, right?"

Boy: "Yes."

Lawyer: "Mr. Jackson pays for your meals, right?"

Boy: "Maybe, maybe."

Lawyer: "And you know who else is paying for that?"

Boy: "I don't know, I'm pretty sure it's Michael."

Well, inconsistent again.

Lawyer: "You've been in a Rolls-Royce once, haven't you?"

Boy: "I just rode in a Rolls-Royce once when I was escaping Neverland with my grandmother."

Lawyer: "Escape?"

Boy: "Yes."

Lawyer: "But you went back a few days later, how long after you fled?"

Boy: "In a few days."

Lawyer: "So you went back and had a second escape, right?"

Boy: "I think so, whatever."

Lawyer: "And then you went back and had a third escape, right?"

Boy: "No!"

Lawyer: "So did you escape a third time?"

Boy: "I don't know."

It's over, completely confused by the question.

In fact, he went in and out of Neverland three times. If the last time was not considered "escape", how could the first two be counted as escape?

...

Another scene.

Lawyer: "Your family was kidnapped by Michael Jackson, so... did you call the police at the hotel?"

Boy: "No."

Lawyer: "Did you scream for help while you were out shopping?"

Boy: "No."

Lawyer: "Did you call the police while you were at your grandmother's house?"

Boy: "No."

Lawyer: "Have you talked to the social worker at Neverland about being kidnapped?"

Boy: "No."

...

Because Michael Jackson's case had too much social influence, it aroused thunderous public opinion.

Therefore, the court decided that although the case involved minors, it allowed the media to report on the trial process after the adjournment.

The requirement is not to have any information about minors.

So during the noon adjournment, Yahoo, MSN, America Online, Myspace and other websites released many records of the morning trial.

Traditional media also reported heavily.

There was an uproar!

This case is really ridiculous!

A reporter at the trial said in an interview with CNN: "When the boy stated that he was sexually assaulted by Michael Jackson, he was as calm as telling someone else's story, but when he said that he was sexually assaulted by Michael Jackson in Neverland When Jackson snubbed, the excitement started to show on his face."

On CBS's noon real-time commentary program, legal expert Andrew Cohen commented: "The alleged molestation victim did not act like a victim in court. At the critical heart of the prosecution's case, the boy's story But nowhere is it impeccable and precise under questioning. Sometimes sullen, sometimes competitive, sometimes insolent, sometimes evasive, the boy behaved more like a punk in court than a criminal victims."

NBC's Noon News commented on this: "Plaintiff boy plainly complained that Michael Jackson repossessed a car that had been used by his family, and then complained that the watch Michael Jackson gave him was not worth much. If this is gratitude, if this is gratitude, then the case is now closed."

FOX News: "When he testified, he spoke in a way that looked more like he was reciting a story he had just read than recounting his own experience. In this way, he looked more like a rehearsal fabrication A man of excess, not just a man who has been instructed."

...

Tang En was having dinner with four young and beautiful beauties in bikinis.

This feeling is very good!

Under the delicious food, my appetite has improved a lot.

It seems that when eating in the future, if it is convenient, you can arrange some beauties in bikinis to accompany you, that will be more comfortable.

On the TV station in the restaurant, a special report on the case of Michael Jackson by the CNN channel is being broadcast.

The host of CNN even gave his opinion very arbitrarily: "I think Michael Jackson will be acquitted! I don't know whether Mr. Jackson has committed any crimes, but this case is a typical false accusation! It's extortion!"

Leighton Meester was wearing a green bikini that wrapped her breasts. She was very sexy. She was sitting next to Tang En. She liked Jackson very much. Hearing this point of view, she was delighted: "Tang En, you said he will really be innocent. release?"

Tang En said seriously: "I think so."

Leighton Meester said with relief: "Then it will definitely happen. That's great, I knew that he was wronged."

Amber Heard suddenly said: "At first glance, it is the result of the influence of the movie "Hunting"."

"Yes, Tang En, you are too great!" Leighton Meester lifted her chin, her eyes sparkled, and she looked at Tang En with admiration.

Alexandra Daddario also pursed her lips and said, "Through a movie, you can influence the outcome of a major case. This is really... really amazing! Much better than my idiot father!"

Tang En couldn't help laughing, and shook his head, "Are you still in a cold war with your parents?"

Alexandra Daddario gave a soft "hmm", "I told them straight up, said... that I met a big guy in Hollywood, and I'm sure I'll make a name for myself. They all They disagreed, and kept reprimanding me. I haven’t talked to them on the phone for more than ten days.”

Tang En twitched the corner of his mouth.

You have such a big heart!

Can't you just spread the word and hide it? Do you have to tell the truth?

If only people from ordinary families like Amber Heard and Amanda Seyfried can see that their daughter has a chance to become a big star, even if the road is more tortuous and complicated, they can accept it.

Not to mention Leighton Meester, her superb mother, she wished she could be a cash cow.

Being able to meet Tang En, I was so excited that I couldn't sleep for several nights.

But Alexandra Daddario's family conditions are very good. Her father is a high prosecutor and her mother is a lawyer. She has a lot of influence in New York.

"Don't mention my name to them." Tang En was a bit apprehensive and warned.

Alexandra Daddario was slightly taken aback, then smiled, "I know, they kept asking me, but I didn't tell them. Hee hee, they thought I was with a bad old man."

"Pfft!"

"Ha ha!"

The girls laughed amusedly.

...

It was 3:30 in the afternoon.

The trial is over.

The sensational news finally came out.

Pop superstar Michael Jackson, acquitted!