Hollywood Road

Sue!

Now that Murphy is at this point, there are some things that he does not need to do personally. As long as this kind of negative news appears on the Internet or any other media, his supporters will naturally refute it. These supporters are not only huge fans, as well as a large number of professional film critics.

One thing no one can deny is that today, as Hollywood movies are becoming more and more homogeneous, Murphy, a very stylized director, is the darling of many professional film critics and the conscience of Hollywood commercial movies.

These people's positions were already biased towards Murphy, and with the proper operation of cAA and 20th Century Fox, they would naturally stand up to speak for Murphy.

Just when negative news was flooding the media, Roger Ebert's partner Richard Rope represented both him and Roger Ebert in the "Roger Ebert and Rope Watching Movies" column Tate published an opinion piece in support of Murphy and The Wolf of Wall Street.

In response to this incident of Murphy being criticized, Richard Rope published an article titled "This Is Why We Can't Have Good Movies: The Oscar Judges' Offense of "The Wolf of Wall Street"", in which he wrote: "The Oscars will always We can’t go back to the golden age of the 1960s and 1970s. Now all members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences are cautious, conservative, safe, and politically correct. Although several excellent works have been selected in recent years , but this is also an extremely individual phenomenon, and this film award still places too much emphasis on works that show the kindness of humanity."

"Is the stuff that The Wolf of Wall Street reacts to disgusting? Damn, that stuff must be disgusting, but it has nothing to do with the movie and Murphy Stanton, because this movie shows the luxurious life of American billionaires. These billionaires Aren't millionaires disgusting when they're making middle class money? What's wrong with the Oscars is that the judges believe that movies should reflect an idealized version of life instead of exploring the darker side of human nature, which is why we're in this It's getting harder and harder to see good movies in this era."

"In that respect, having Murphy Stanton and his movies is a blessing in this day and age."

With Richard Rope leading the charge on behalf of Roger Ebert, more film critics began to stand up to support Murphy. For example, "The New Yorker", which has always ridiculed the world with acrimonious attitude, also released a column comments.

"Behind the glitz, extravagance and absurdity, Murphy Stanton endowed "The Wolf of Wall Street" with more realistic critical significance. The film is full of cynicism about today's money society. It seems that the value orientation seems to be very problematic. There are many things worth thinking about.”

"What is shown in the film is the United States. As long as you have money, all legal and illegal, moral and immoral, beneficial and harmful, normal and perverted, as long as you need it, I will definitely be able to do it for you. Now, this is the American dream today, as long as you have money, you can get what you want, as long as you have money!"

"This is the so-called American dream. Murphy Stanton stripped off the bright exterior to let people see what's inside. Many people are greedy, so Jordan Belfort can make a fortune. If these people are not greedy, How did Jordan Belfort take advantage of it? If Jordan Belfort wasn’t greedy, how did he find these greedy clients? The American dream is to make everyone greedy, greedy for money, with nothing but the smell of dollars.”

"With the money, Jordan Belfort has nothing to do in his empty days except sex and drugs."

"This is the American-style luxury, all kinds of drugs, grils, parties, this is the way of life of the young rich in the United States, they did not use the money to do more useful things, their image is not as tall as the legend , the film also mentioned that the reason why these rich people donate money to charity organizations is just because they think it is fun, or they just do what they want, but the money he donates is basically a drop in the bucket compared to what he earns.

"

"Murphy Stanton just wants to tell everyone through this movie that this is the world you yearn for: America and the American Dream, everyone take a good look and open your eyes to see what kind of world this is, this Tm is an abandoned All the worlds of morality, ethics, faith, and ideals, if you want to come to this world, cocaine and the like are indispensable, this is still an entry level, and there are many things behind."

"So, it's really sad to live in this **** country!"

Seeing the comments on The New Yorker, Murphy can only say that a hundred people have a hundred Hamlets in their hearts, and everyone has a different understanding of the movie.

Compared with these professional film critics with big brains, the ideas of Murphy's hardcore fans are much simpler. Murphy's movies are always good. If some people don't understand or think it's not good, it's because of their IQ. Rather than the problem of the film, to oppose Murphy and his films is to be against their fan groups.

The Murphy-Stanton Fan Association in Los Angeles, like the imDB Murphy-Stanton Discussion Group, is the largest organization supporting Murphy in North America. The structure is more rigorous. The person in charge of the association not only has close ties with the cAA, but also has a small resident office of the Fan Association on the outskirts of Beverly Hills.

These seem to be spontaneous organizations of movie fans, but they are definitely not as simple as the surface.

"There are a lot of people slandering Murphy, especially those self-righteous Oscar judges!"

In the office, the person in charge of the Los Angeles Murphy-Stanton Fan Association said to the dozen or so core members gathered, "We must not sit idly by, we must fight back!"

"right!"

A young man looked quite angry, "We must fight back!"

Others echoed their words.

"In this way, we don't have the right to speak about professional reviews, so we leave it to the media and film critics who support Murphy."

The person in charge looked at his subordinates and said very seriously, "After you go back, mobilize as many movie fans as possible to post on Internet forums, portals, Rotten Tomatoes, imDB and other websites, especially social networking sites. Support Murphy and The Wolf of Wall Street, the more the better, the louder the better!"

"no problem."

"Leave it to us."

"Don't worry, we are all ready to start."

The dozen or so core members seem to be quite active, and they are more concerned about their own family affairs.

After explaining the precautions, the person in charge said, "Don't rush to leave for a while, have lunch together at noon, and take away your activity funds by the way."

Those people all laughed happily.

After lunch, they received the funds for the event. These people can be said to be full of fighting power. They immediately mobilized movie fans, centered on social networking sites, and became active on the entire Internet.

The person in charge of the Murphy Fan Association even went into battle in person.

"I really admire Murphy. For nearly three hours, the camera and Robert Downey Jr. were as crazy as taking drugs, all kinds of wine and meat, all kinds of drunkenness, all kinds of extravagance, all kinds of drugs and rough, away from XXX You can’t open your mouth at the top, you have no morals, and you have no lower limit!”

"I felt like I was completely depraved with Murphy and Robert Downey Jr. through the whole movie. No wonder some Oscar judges felt uncomfortable after watching it, so much so that they criticized Murphy for embarrassment. In fact, I can think of Murphy watching it. He will definitely be proud of his arrogant look when he sees these attacks, because it means that he is not old, because he is not conservative, and he sings praises for this society, because he can always be keenly aware of the dark side of this country. Because he dared to show this side in front of everyone!"

"Many people say that Murphy is sometimes a movie sociologist. Well, that's right. This movie is his observation, because poverty can't test people, but wealth can test people. He just sees greed and selfishness, he sees lust, he sees It seems that everyone is pursuing superficial excitement, but behind it is deeper depression, emptiness and fear."

"In short, the best movie I've seen in the past six months is "The Wolf of Wall Street". Although sex, sex, and drug use account for almost half of the scenes, just saying '[emailprotected]' hundreds of times , but this is all indispensable!"

"I don't understand why so many people criticize this movie, you say it's full of poison and sex and not critical? Wrong! This movie is extra critical because it's full of drugs, money and flesh ! It so profoundly reflects the alienation of people!"

In just one afternoon, the voices cheering for Murphy on the Internet, just like the professional film critics in today's newspapers, showed an overwhelming advantage. The most direct reaction was the score of imDB. Over time, "The Wolf of Wall Street" has gained thousands of scores of nines and above.

Different from online trolls, these ratings come from many old accounts. Even if imDB screens them, they can't find any problems, because they are all from the hands of real movie fans.

Of course, amidst the applause, the voices of Black Murphy and "The Wolf of Wall Street" will not disappear.

To be honest, some people like anything and some people don't like it. Stars are public figures, and directors are gradually coming to the stage. Some people like their movies and others don't.

It's just that Black Murphy, especially the voice of "The Wolf of Wall Street" is a bit loud this time.

"This time the situation is not normal."

On Sunday night, Bill Rossis approached Murphy specifically, "The sound of hacking you and The Wolf of Wall Street doesn't seem to have formed spontaneously."

"It didn't form spontaneously?" Murphy immediately grasped the key point of Bill Rossis' words, "So it was organized?" (To be continued)). If you like this work, you are welcome to come to the starting point () to vote, your support is my biggest motivation. Mobile users please read here. )