I asked you to write about the statue, and you wrote about Foundation 173?

While the comment area of ​​the live broadcast room was filled with excitement and comments flying around, Yang Feng, after thinking about it a few times in his mind, began to continue writing.

【Let me give you an example. Is a gap of 0.001 mm really that important? If not, don't add it. If yes, please give a suitable reason.】

【One final point: Don’t include things that are self-evident. Just like a living SCP object, there is no need to specifically write about what it eats every day, unless it is absolutely necessary.】

【Also, please remember that the SCP Foundation follows rationality and ruthlessness, not cruelty and tyranny.】

【As mentioned above, from a vicarious perspective, why would we abuse and torture an SCP object that may cooperate with us or cooperate with containment?】

【The bottom line is that special containment procedures must be reasonable and logical.】

---

Live broadcast room comment area

"Ah, why do I think those very detailed data should also be written? Shouldn’t we be extremely cautious when containing such dangerous supernatural beings?"

"Then you should consider us, the audience outside the screen!"

"I think something like this is customary."

"I think there is no conflict between cruelty and cruelty and rational coldness. We should be more ruthless when dealing with supernatural beings that harm human beings. Why are you such a saint!"

"What extreme brother?"

"You seem to be a bit extreme……"

---

Yang Feng suddenly stopped while typing on the keyboard.

Because the next part he wants to write about is the SCP object hierarchy.

But in fact, according to the current situation, this cannot be written in theory because it is inappropriate.

After all, in the previous life, the project hierarchy system was formed after a large number of SCP projects were written. In this parallel world, we can't put the cart before the horse, right?

After struggling internally for almost a minute, Yang Feng made a decision: write.

When the time comes, I will use the reasons I have thought up in the past two days to excuse myself. While typing on the keyboard, he thought

【Next is the SCP item level system】

【The first thing to note is that this level is not determined by the threat level of the SCP item, but by its overall containment difficulty.】

【There are currently four main levels】

【Safe level: Very easy to contain. But this does not mean that there is no danger, but it means that after being successfully contained, there is basically no need to pay more attention to it.】

【Euclid level: Containment difficulty is erratic. Because those assigned this level are usually self-aware SCP objects, this also causes special containment procedures to easily become outdated.】

【Keter level: Extremely difficult to contain. Normally, SCP objects assigned this level require a significant investment of resources and effort to maintain special containment procedures.】

【Thaumiel Class: Normally not difficult to contain. Because SCP projects assigned this level can be used by the SCP Foundation and fight against other SCP projects.】

【There are also two secondary classifications】

【That is, the Neutralized level, which means that the SCP item has lost its supernatural effect, and the Explained level, which has been scientifically explained.】

【However, as long as the logic is reasonable, you can also use your own project levels, but the above seven are the most widely used.】

(There are currently nine that can be widely used, but the protagonist will only write six at the moment.)

---

As the somewhat put-the- cart-before-the-horse project level system was written out, the comment area of ​​the live broadcast room instantly became popular.

"Project hierarchy? No, you've just written three SCPs, how come you've even sorted out the level system?"

"At a glance, you can tell that he came up with it two days ago. After all, he finishes it so quickly every time."

"Safe and the two secondary words are easy to understand. Euclid has been"explained". Who can figure out the meanings of the other two words?"

"Keter originally came from the Hebrew system, and its literal translation is crown/crown. It has many different meanings and interpretations, but I think it refers to transcendence."

"While Thaumiel can be translated as miracle, at the theological level it is interpreted as the power to fight evil and resolve chaos, representing the balance and reconciliation between opposites."

"Worship the boss Worship the boss"

"I don’t dare to take it seriously. I looked it up online."

"What interests me more is the last sentence. When the time comes to write it, I will definitely create something awesome!"

"If it is not broad, then it is a dead end?"

"Isn’t it okay to write Lehe Lehe?"

---

【Let’s talk about the tone of the text again. Everyone is probably familiar with the clinical writing style, but some people may have misunderstandings about it.

【They think that as long as they use all kinds of uncommon words to make the writing more elegant, this is not actually the case. To write this style perfectly, you only need to be familiar with the following content】

【Avoid ambiguity and be as concise and precise as possible. Don’t spend a few sentences saying things that can be said in one sentence; don’t write vague and flashy words; delete unnecessary adjectives for me, and finally, be as straightforward as possible】

【The second is professionalism. After all, you are writing from the perspective of a researcher. I don’t think you will write bad jokes in professional reports or papers.】

【The most important point is that the content of the full text should be stripped of personal emotions as much as possible, because this will make the content unobjective.】

【I'll give an example here】

【If you were to describe a vampire, you wouldn't write"This vampire has scarlet eyes and scary fangs and loves to drink human blood.""】

【The correct writing should be"This humanoid individual has glowing red eyes and protruding fangs, and has a strong desire for human blood.""】

---

Live broadcast room comment area

"Did Contestant No. 100 read the SCP written by those copycats? Why did every sentence hit them in the face perfectly?

？"

"I think it's very likely yes"

"Avoid ambiguity and be concise, which I feel is useful in many works."

"I mean, why does the SCP-002 I wrote look so weird? It turns out it’s because there are too many personal emotions and flashy words!"

"Come on, write upstairs!"

"The two descriptions of vampires in the last paragraph are so interesting"

"And it’s still a sharp contrast"

"I think player No. 100 has relevant ideas not only in the past few days, but also a few months ago. Look at how detailed and complete these contents are."

"He's really lucky……"

"Speaking of which, the other contestants are still busy writing content, and contestant No. 100 has started to do his own thing.……"

"Everything he writes is very fluent, it’s like he has the power of speed"

---

PS: Please give me flowers, evaluation votes, and monthly votes for the new book! Ask for all the data! This is the greatest support for my writing!