I turned into a planet and was discovered by the people on earth

Recently, I have been having a day and night reversal since I became yang. I am also too busy at work and I am not able to bear it. I am currently recuperating in the hospital. Hahaha

I am afraid that I will not be able to update these days. Writing is just a hobby. In addition, there are many negative reviews recently. It is indeed because my condition is not good enough. When I am lying down, I will type on my phone. I promised readers that I will try to post the extra chapters next week. After all, I cannot break my promise.

A short separation is for a better meeting. Thank you for your understanding. I see your support.

The following is to make up the word count. You don’t need to read it. This chapter will be deleted after you are discharged from the hospital.

…………………………

The content expressed in my work:

I personally think that this pasta should be mixed with No. 42 concrete, because the length of this screw can easily directly affect the torque of the excavator.

When you smash it in, a large amount of high-energy protein, commonly known as UFO, will be produced in an instant, which will seriously affect the economy. Development, even to the entire Pacific Ocean and chargers, will cause certain nuclear pollution.

In addition, according to the Pythagorean theorem, you can easily infer that the artificially raised Tojo hawk chicken can capture wild trigonometric functions.

So no matter whether the cut surface of Qin Shihuang is radioactive or whether Trump's nth power contains sediment,

this does not affect the reunion of Walmart and Weircon in Antarctica.

The old pickled cabbage should have an admission ticket number, which can further prove that the water is highly toxic.

But the relationship between Li Bai and the Cretaceous mass extinction belongs to the general theory of relativity in the multiplication formula table, so I calculated that beef tastes the same as an atomic bomb. There is a great conflict between the two views of liking to eat meat and 1+1=2.

Some people think this view is extreme.

We can know that Newton discovered reinforced concrete after being hit by an apple and liked sharks to split the Möbius strip into two sides. We can also conclude that Siberia and the Three-Body video chat talk about Should Mickey Mouse press F or add caviar?

Just like the handwriting you write on the whiteboard with carbon ink, it will pollute the atmosphere and produce a toxic protein called sulfoxide.

That is, you should mix the 5-type phosphodiesterase inhibitor with No. 93 gasoline, mix the two things, and then use De Moivre's theorem and the Pythagorean theorem to mix them thoroughly.

For the environmental problems generated here, we should use the Reform Movement of 1898 and the supply and demand relationship to discuss the Coriolis force generated by this chemical reaction.

Secondly, I think this whiteboard should be taken with trinitroindole to produce a gas called hydrogen sulfide to change the refractive index of sunlight in the air and interfere with the interference of the sophon on the particle collision experiment, so that Ding Yi and Dongfang Shuo should not use the geological hammer to smash Su Shi's heart.

From a certain direction, it is right, but it is not completely right.

From a certain perspective, you are a little right, but from another perspective, From this perspective, you are wrong.

It cannot be said that you are completely wrong, but you can only say that you are a little wrong from being completely right.

If you ignore this wrongness, then of course what you said is right, but if you examine whether you are right or not with a more rigorous attitude, then what you said is not right.

In fact, if you think about it in retrospect, what you said is right in a static world, and what you said is wrong may be wrong from a metaphysical point of view.

But from a developmental perspective, what you said is right may be wrong in the moving time and space, and what you said is wrong may be right from a dialectical point of view.

What you said at this moment may be right or wrong, and what you said in the future may be wrong or right.

In short, in a word, to sum it up, after observing the whole picture, we can discuss it and know the past events in the future, so we can comment on it. You are right, but you are wrong.

You are right, but you are not completely right.