: The Final Answer to the Accidental Execution Paradox

In fact, what V-side hackers said is a bit obscure.

What he meant, in short, was—

Lawyer Jim pits death row inmate Terry to death.

At this time, Jiang Zhe glanced at the barrage in the live broadcast room.

All are asking, why was Terry killed by Jim?

Facing the problem, Jiang Zhe made a subdivision and answered the doubts of the V-face hackers.

He called up the previous simulation screen.

Emphatically exhorted: “Please watch the simulation of why Jiang Zhe said ‘lawyers are a burden’. After reading it, you will know why lawyers are scams!”

Immediately afterwards.

The simulated 3D space reappears in the living room.

This is still the courtroom.

After Judge Cooper still said that sentence: “Jiang Zhe, I will surprise you. As long as you are surprised, it means that there is nothing wrong with my promise! At the same time, when the accident occurs, it is also yours.” time of death.”

At this point in the broadcast, Jiang Zhe explained seriously: “Attention everyone: the emphasis is on the word ‘accident’.”

When the previous death row inmate was Terry.

Gold lawyer Jim deduces a series of possibilities with his unique thinking logic.

In the end, the seven days of derivation were all pushed to the conclusion that ‘Terry will not die’.

Then no matter what day the execution will take place, Terry will be surprised.

When Jiang Zhe replaced Terry with a mock Jiang Zhe.

in the simulated space.

Just when the gold medal lawyer Jim was about to defend Jiang Zhe.

Simulated Jiang Zhe smiled confidently: “This debate does not need you, you will only become my burden!”

Hearing this, “You!!!” The lawyer immediately showed shame and indignation, turned around and left on the spot!

At this moment.

Everyone in the simulated space is suspended.

Only the simulated Jiang Zhe can move freely.

Next, the simulated Jiang Zhe turned around and faced the fourth wall and explained: “Audience, why did I refuse the lawyer’s defense?”

“Because… I know that the lawyer will use his unique derivation to prove that I will not be executed for the next 7 days.”

“The answer is simple!”

“Once the lawyer draws the conclusion that ‘Jiang Zhe will not die for seven days’—”

“Then I, imitating Jiang Zhe, will not know which day will be executed by the judge in the next 7 days.”

“When I don’t know which day of the next seven days I will die, I also lose my independent judgment.”

“After losing my self-judgment—”

“Then I will substitute into the thinking of death row prisoner Terry, because Terry thinks that he will not die within 7 days. So I, imitating Jiang Zhe, in the next 7 days, whichever day of death is important to me. It will be an accident!”

The meaning of imitating Jiang Zhe is still a bit confusing.

Listen to the imitation of Jiang Zhe’s self-introduction to the camera.

The audience felt novelty for a while, and at the same time felt a little enlightened.

It still seems to be a bit convoluted and incomprehensible!

At this time.

Facing the camera in the live broadcast room.

Jiang Zhe himself came forward and explained: “Don’t be confused, everyone.”

“You just need to know one thing—”

“Without the lawyer’s ‘Terry’s 7 Days to Live’ conclusion, then the mock Jiang Zhe would never die.”

“There is a lawyer’s inference of ‘I will not die for 7 days’, simulating that Jiang Zhe will be executed by a judge because of an accident.”

“So the meaning of the V-side hacker is that the lawyer killed the death row prisoner Terry.”

Heard this explanation.

The audience suddenly realized.

shortness of breath, A certain knot in my mind seemed to be untied.

“Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!”

“I understand! This case tells us that lawyers are the biggest scourge!”

“That’s right! Terry on death row wouldn’t have died without a lawyer.”

“Oh my god! So that’s how it is!”

“That’s why imitating Jiang Zhe didn’t repeat Terry’s old path. I’ll go. I didn’t understand until now!”

“…”

In the Kyoto Research Institute.

The second mathematician who previously deduced Jiang Zhe.

He had given a conclusion before: “Because lawyer Jim ‘assumed’ that the prisoner would be executed on a certain day among the seven days, then the death row prisoner Terry would not be executed on that day, so the execution became the next day!”

Until I heard Jiang Zhe’s explanation.

The mathematician suddenly fell into confusion:

“Isn’t my previous inference correct? Isn’t it the same conclusion as the V-face hacker?”

His answer is extremely similar to that of the V-face hacker.

It’s all because of the premise that the gold medal lawyer “assumes that death row prisoner Terry will not die”.

Just when mathematicians doubt themselves and cannot answer.

He threw this question to Jiang Zhe.

“Is the lawyer’s reasoning all wrong?”

After seeing the problem, Jiang Zhe in the picture gave conclusive evidence.

“I saw an audience of experts asking me to tell the lawyer’s wrong derivation.”

“Whether it’s all wrong or not, everyone, please take a closer look and you will know.”

Speaking of this, he wrote a sentence on the LCD screen—“[1]: The lawyer’s bunch of assumptions only existed on the premise that Terry could live to the sixth day. But Terry didn’t Can’t survive the sixth day!”

“Now we break down the lawyer’s assumptions.”

“We can get the following two small inferences—”

Jiang Zhe presented the two inferences in the form of pictures.

[Two reasonings based on the lawyer’s assumption]

[1]: “No execution on the sixth day” + “7th day is the last day” → “No execution on the seventh day”

[2]: “No execution on the fifth day” + “The sixth day is the last day” → “No execution on the sixth day”

simulated here.

Jiang Zhe immediately explained: “Everyone, please see that the so-called condition of “the sixth day is the last day of possible execution” by the gold medal lawyer Jim was introduced by “no execution on the seventh day”.”

Because lawyer Jim made an ego, arrogance, and the biggest subjective error of judgment in history——

At the beginning, he directly ruled out the conclusion of “no execution” on the seventh day.

In fact, it cannot be ruled out!

Because this is the lawyer Jim, on the premise that the death row prisoner Terry “assumes he can survive to the sixth day”, he infers the conclusion that “the execution must not be executed on the seventh day”!

Actually?

Lawyer Jim’s assumption does not hold true!

“So the lawyer’s inference is wrong, and the answer can be seen at a glance!”

“One: no execution on the sixth day → no execution on the seventh day.”

“Two: no execution on the seventh day → the sixth day is the last day → no execution on the sixth day.”

At this point in the explanation, Jiang Zhe gave the final answer:

“Final answer: Lawyers have been taking two ‘hypothetical’ conditions and inferring each other.”

“As the saying goes, lawyers use two false conditions they put forward to reason back and forth with each other!”

“How can two non-existing ‘assumptions’ be used as real evidence to judge whether the judge will execute the sentence?”

“Because lawyer Jim used two hypothetical conditions to deduce the conclusion of ‘not dead in 7 days’, Terry subconsciously believed that he would not die. Therefore, it was satisfied that Judge Cooper executed Terry on any day within seven days. For Terry From here, it will be very surprising, very unexpected!!!”

This is the most correct answer in the logical thinking of “Accidental Execution Paradox”!

And the easy-to-understand answer also has-

It is exactly what Jiang Zhe said to lawyer Jim earlier: ‘I don’t need you, you will only become my burden. You will make me lose my judgment on death. Once without you, I will not die! ‘

Following Jiang Zhe’s voice fell.

The experts and the audience were all stunned!

Only then did they truly understand the final two perfect answers to the ‘Accidental Execution Paradox’! !

Kyoto Research Institute.

The group led by Lao Zhou couldn’t help swallowing their saliva.

Almost instantly, the experts were all dumbfounded!

They looked at each other for a moment, and they all saw the shock on each other’s faces.

“I don’t know what to say… This is the strongest logical thinking problem I have ever encountered!!!”

“This logical thinking question is really too fierce!”

“These two answers are actually one answer, they can be fused into one answer, and each answer can perfectly explain ‘accidental execution’.”

“It’s only now that I understand that everything is done by the lawyer Jim under the premise of two arrogant assumptions. Without the lawyer, the death row inmate Terry would not die at all!”

“…”

After getting the answer, the experts looked at each other in blank dismay.

Jiang Zhe was able to break down such powerful logical thinking questions in an orderly manner, and his own thinking was not tied into knots?

This has already convinced everyone at the scene!

Only the second mathematician was a little morose.

Just a little bit, just a little bit closer to being the first to solve the paradox of ‘accidental execution’.

Once he is the first to unlock it, he will be popular in the academic circle of this world for a while…

However, things backfired, and it was still a little bit worse!

Just as the experts, the audience was stunned by the answer.

In the picture-in-picture in the live broadcast room, Wang Xue suddenly appeared again.

Seeing Wang Xue’s next sentence, all the audience in the live broadcast room were excited!

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like