Losing Money to Be a Tycoon

Zheng Hao talked about his entrepreneurial experience in front of the camera, including some positive cases and some negative cases.

For Zheng Hao, the setbacks he encountered in the early stage of his business were all because the employees did not work hard and did not work hard. As a result, the company did not have an advantage in the competition with other companies, which triggered a series of butterfly effects!

After the company went bankrupt, these lazy employees patted their butts to find another job, and the failure of the business could only be borne by him alone.

Of course, Zheng Hao has never really failed in his entrepreneurial venture. His worst result is just selling the company to other big companies. But in Zheng Hao’s view, any failure to achieve the top of the industry can be regarded as a failure. !

Even though he has gained a huge amount of personal wealth through the first two entrepreneurial ventures, he still regards it as a failure, and he has a grudge against the laziness of his employees!

Therefore, Zheng Hao began to study various management studies, formulating various KPIs and indicators within the company, and through the HR department to increase the number of layers, so that the entire company can operate in an extremely efficient state!

At the same time, Zheng Hao has accumulated a wealth of experience through the first two ventures, and all the pits that can be stepped on have been successfully avoided, and this has made the success of home delivery.

In the process of explaining, Zheng Hao certainly did not simply preach, but used many cases in the entrepreneurial process. Many of the cases were rich, vivid and detailed, and the audience nodded one after another.

In particular, the fact that lazy employees caused the company to fail is particularly convincing because of Zheng Hao's large number of detailed cases.

It even aroused widespread resonance among many entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs on the scene!

In fact, does this phenomenon exist?

Of course it exists.

Laziness is human nature, especially when a large number of heavy work tasks are weighed down on the body, and when these tasks are completed but no intuitive feedback is seen, most people will have laziness.

For a company, employees who concentrate on making screws are good employees. Of course, those employees who are cranky, inefficient at work, and even affect the atmosphere of the entire team, are of course the objects of admonition to talk.

Entrepreneurs who agree with this concept are not uncommon, and even some economists have seen this appeal and openly stand for entrepreneurs.

For example, some economists put forward the idea that "employees lazy can exploit the company, but it is difficult for the company to effectively manage and counteract employees' laziness, so the company is actually a disadvantaged group".

On the surface, it looks like a violent argument, but in fact, the person who said this is very clear about the audience's target of his speech, but it only satisfies the demands of some entrepreneurs.

Therefore, Zheng Hao's similar remarks are still very marketable, especially those entrepreneurs who fail will not think that they have problems with the management of the company, but because their employees have been lazy!

The subordinates are scattered and have no sense of responsibility and ownership at all, which led to the failure of the company's entrepreneurship.

Seeing that the atmosphere on the scene is getting higher and higher, Zheng Hao knows that the time is almost here.

So he changed the conversation and continued to follow this point.

"I found that some companies now want to fool the public by advocating some remarks, and then deceive other startups to put themselves in a dominant position in the market competition, and finally achieve ulterior goals!"

"I think we must be wary of these companies!"

"What these entrepreneurs say are things that seem to be quite correct on the surface, so they are even more confusing!"

"Every employee who wants to grow must establish a sense of ownership in the company! We entrepreneurs treat the company as a child! If you blindly listen to such false statements, the end result is nothing more than the company's bankruptcy. , Entrepreneurship fails, employees are unemployed!"

As soon as he said this, the faces of the audience showed surprise.

Because through Zheng Hao's remarks, the audience unconsciously associated with Tenda Group.

Tengda Group has always been known for its excellent employee benefits such as not working overtime. This also makes Tengda Group a dream place for all workers, allowing Tengda Group to take advantage of public opinion wars!

After all, most of the netizens who participated in the public opinion discussion are themselves beating workers, of course they are on the side of beating workers.

At this time, Zheng Hao pointed the finger at Tenda Group, obviously because of the long-standing grievances between Zhaiju Takeaway and Tenda Group!

Moyu Maimai dismantled the business model of home delivery takeaway twice, and made many attacks on the fact that home delivery squeezed the takeaway brother. This has led to the fact that the two sides have always been in a state of incompatible public opinion, and Moyu Maimai It also succeeded in seizing more markets.

For this, Zheng Hao is obviously totally unacceptable!

Zheng Hao is now not only targeting fish to take out, but even expanding to the entire Tengda Group. He believes that Tengda Group advocates this kind of high welfare for employees, so that employees do not have to work overtime, do not have to maintain the spirit of struggle, which has ulterior motives. .

You know, this is an open class program with a high degree of attention. Zheng Hao's remarks here will definitely be widely disseminated, and may even be edited into material and sent to major video sites such as the Elliott website!

Is this going to start a new round of online public opinion wars?

However, Zheng Hao's remarks are more like a rude smear of Tenda Group. Can this really work?

Zheng Hao smiled slightly and continued: "I know, I say this will make everyone confused!"

"Now the first-class large companies are trying their best to increase employee benefits. If increasing employee benefits is wrong, it is against common sense of management! So why are these big companies doing this?"

"For example, Tengda Group achieved its take-off through strict implementation of the 8-hour work system and generous employee benefits. It has developed into a huge giant in just a few years. If Tengda’s management ideas are problematic, then Tengda How did it develop?"

"This statement obviously only knows one but not the other!"

"Completely confuses and obscures the objective differences between different companies, regardless of the specific situation of each company, forcibly using a one-size-fits-all approach to solve the problem!"

"Why are first-class large companies trying to increase employee benefits? Because these large companies have high profits, they can attract outstanding employees and motivate them through these employee benefits."

"Excellent employees have higher work efficiency and self-consciousness, and these benefits can allow them to better play their value!"

"But large companies often attach the most importance to corporate management. They will use many other methods to improve the efficiency of their employees and make them better qualified for the job. Benefits are just one of their many management methods!"

"For a small start-up company, it does not have the huge profits of a large company, nor does it have the attraction of a large company to outstanding employees, but forcibly learn from the employee benefits of a large company. This is tantamount to not having the life of a large company but winning Sickness!"

"Of course, when Tenda Group was a small company, it promoted employee benefits, but Tenda's subsequent achievements are not only due to employee benefits."

"Tengda's development is based on the high profits of the game industry and its clever management model! Although I don't know the specific situation, I can be sure that Tenda is not just as simple as high welfare! Otherwise, it has long been made by those who are lazy. The employees are overwhelmed, how can they develop to the current scale?"

"But when Tenda promotes its so-called Tenda spirit to the outside world, it only promotes the spirit of not working overtime, and does not mention any other management details."

"why is that?"

"Obviously! This is a very clever public opinion tactic of Tenda. It allows itself to stand in the same position as the workers, so as to gain broad public opinion support, so that it can be invincible in the public opinion battle with other companies!"

"But think about it carefully, if all companies are like Tenda, offering high benefits to employees, how many companies can persist? Are those small companies that can't afford such good employee benefits not worthy of survival?"

"Single advocacy of this kind of high welfare aims to weaken all start-up companies through high welfare, so that all small companies can no longer pose any threat to Tenda, thereby achieving market monopoly!"

Zheng Hao's speech caused a whispering voice on the scene.

Obviously many people did not expect that Zheng Hao would point the finger at Tenda Group on this occasion!

I have to admit that Zheng Hao's speech was supported by many people.

As an excellent entrepreneur, Zheng Hao has a certain reputation and influence, coupled with some successful experience in management, make his words sound very convincing!

In particular, many small entrepreneurs present here also empathize with what Zheng Hao said.

Since the emergence of Tenda Group, 8-hour work system, no overtime, high salary and benefits, etc., have become common demands for hitting workers. The popularity of Tenda Group's recruitment examination is enough to show how eager and welcome migrant workers are!

But not everyone can join Tenda Group. Those who are temporarily unable to join Tenda Group will naturally compare their current company with Tenda Group.

How can this contrast not be sour?

In the opinion of the bosses of these small companies, their own employees are greedy for the benefits of Tenda and require their company to implement the 8-hour work system, or because employees are dissatisfied with the status quo, they fish and paddle during overtime work. Isn't it completely in line with the so-called "employees are exploiting the company" statement?

How does Tenda reach its end to maintain high welfare? This has always been an unsolved mystery!

The most likely explanation is that Tenda, as a game company, has supported the company's welfare with its generous profits.

But it is clear that other companies do not have the financial strength to support it and cannot fully replicate Tenda's model.

Therefore, Zheng Hao's remarks, although on the surface full of offensiveness towards the Tenda Group, did reflect the demands of some bosses, and even some of the workers felt quite pertinent!

If the company goes bankrupt due to the laziness of its employees and loses jobs, wouldn't ordinary employees even have the opportunity to work overtime?

Of course, when someone heard this argument, they began to yell at Zheng Hao for his shamelessness!

As an outstanding young entrepreneur, how can he say that exploiting and squeezing employees is so refreshing and refined?

Regardless, Zheng Hao's speech in "Open Class for Entrepreneurs" will surely cause an uproar on the Internet!