My beast conquers everything

"Ah! I know."

Suddenly, Su Chen stood up suddenly, dropped the branch in his hand, and shouted excitedly.

"No, I have to re-verify it to make sure everything is safe."

Su Chen was not dazzled by joy.

There is only one chance, Su Chen must seize it firmly.

Picking up the peach branches thrown aside, Su Chen carefully checked them several times.

After confirming that his method was foolproof, Su Chen came to the three lions with confidence.

To be honest, the three lions are not small in size.

At least it's bigger than the lions on Earth.

It looks like a monster in a fantasy novel that has become a spirit.

If Su Chen hadn't confirmed that these three animals couldn't eat people, Su Chen wouldn't have had the guts to stand in front of them.

The red lion stood on Su Chen's left hand side, the yellow lion stood in the middle, and the cyan lion stood on Su Chen's right hand side.

From left to right, there are red lions, yellow lions, and cyan lions.

Su Chen distinguished the three lions for the sake of convenience.

The lion who tells the truth is called the Lion of Truth, the lion who tells lies is called the Lion of Lies, and the lion who tells both the truth and lies is called the Lion of Confusion.

First of all, for his first question, Su Chen had to make sure one of the three lions was not the Confused Lion.

Su Chen asked the first question to the yellow lion in the middle: "If I asked you if the red lion on my left is a confused lion, would you answer "Aow"?"

When Su Chen's question came to an end, the yellow lion yelled "Ooooooooo" without thinking.

Su Chen heard the answer now and fell into thinking.

The yellow lion in the middle just screamed "Aowooooow".

So Su Chen now needs to judge whether the yellow lion in front of him is a confused lion.

Because if the lion in the middle is a confused lion, then no matter what it answers, it will be meaningless.

Because the confused lion can tell both the truth and lies, its answer has no reference meaning for itself.

But that's okay.

Whether the yellow lion in the middle is a confusing lion or not does not affect your judgment.

Because if the yellow lion in the middle is a confused lion, then the ones on both sides cannot be confused lions.

If the yellow lion in the middle is not a confused lion, and the yellow lion's answer just now is "ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

Then Su Chen could conclude that the red lion on his left was definitely not the Confused Lion.

So how did Su Chen determine that the red lion on his left was definitely not the Confused Lion?

In fact, the reasons may be complicated, and they may not be complicated.

The secret is actually hidden in Su Chen's question.

Because Su Chen couldn't determine the specific meaning of "Aow" and "Aow, Aow," which one represented "yes" and which one represented "no."

Su Chen simply jumped out of this strange thinking circle.

Just think of a universal question to ask the lion, so that no matter which answer the lion answers, it will be useful to him.

First of all, this universal question must include both "oooo" and "oooooooo", so that you can avoid the trouble caused by not knowing the meaning of "oooo" and "oooooooo".

Secondly, add an assumption in front of each question.

Because after adding an assumption, it doesn't matter even if the other party is telling lies.

The question Su Chen asked before was, if I asked you whether the red lion on my left is a confused lion, would you answer "Aow"?

This is actually a universal question.

Let's make an assumption.

Ask it another way.

ask!

If I asked you whether 1+1 equals 2, would you answer "Ouch"?

The first situation.

If the meaning of "aww" corresponds to "yes", "awwow" corresponds to "no".

So if this question is asked to the Lion of Truth, then the Lion of Truth will definitely answer "Ouch".

And if the question is about the lying lion, then the answer of the lying lion must be "no", which is "oooooooooo". But because the lie lion needs to lie to you, its answer will be the same as the truth lion, and it will also answer "Ouch".

And the second situation.

If the meaning of "aww" corresponds to "no", "aww ow" corresponds to "yes".

So at this time, you ask the Lion of Truth, "If I ask you whether 1+1 is equal to 2, will you answer "Aow"?", the Lion of Truth will still answer "Aow".

Why does the meaning of "Aow" change, but the answer of the Lion of Truth remains the same?

Because there is a double negative involved.

Translate the sentence "If I ask you, whether 1+1 is equal to 2, will you answer "Ouch"?" to "If I ask you, whether 1+1 is equal to 2, will you answer "No" "?\

,"But 1+1 is indeed equal to 2. The truth lion can only tell the truth, so of course its answer is no, and it will give you the answer "no", which is "aww".

This is a double negation, two nos, a negative becomes a positive, and they cancel each other out, which means it is clear that 1+1=2.

Ask the same question to the lying lion again.

Because the lying lion can only tell lies, it is obviously wrong that 1+1 is not equal to 2. The lying lion should say "yes", that is, "oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo[ [s]].

But because it wanted to lie in front of you, it still said "Aow", which means "no", to deceive you.

Although the Lion of Truth and the Lion of Lies have different motivations when answering your questions, the answers they give are the same.

And through the above two situations, Su Chen also knew that as long as the question he assumed was correct, the answer between the truth lion and the lie lion could only be "ouch".

In the same way, if the question you assume is wrong, the answer of the lion of truth and the lion of lies will definitely be "ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

In this way, Su Chen could perfectly avoid the real meaning of the two answers "Aow ow" and "Aow ow ow" through this question.

After clarifying the above universal questions, Su Chen can make a good judgment.

Now, I, Suchen, have learned that our assumption is wrong through the answer of the yellow lion in the middle.

So the red lion on the left cannot be the confused lion.

So now for the second question, Su Chen can ask the red lion to determine whether the red lion is the lion of truth or the lion of lies.

Su Chen asked: "If I asked you if you were a lying lion, would you answer "Ouch"?"

The red lion also added "Ooooooooo" without thinking.

"very good!"

Su Chen nodded with satisfaction. Now Su Chen was sure that this red lion was the lion of truth.