Number One Player

Why must the speed of light be constant?

Why is the universe expanding?

…

These things that were originally regarded as natural truths seem to have a different meaning when I think about it now.

-------------------

The author has something to say:

Note:

1. This explanation of the Fermi Paradox is taken from the Internet

2. The Fermi Paradox is a very interesting paradox. On the basis of it, countless classic conjectures and science fiction works were born. The Dark Forest of "Three-Body Problem" is an explanation of the Fermi Paradox. Liu directly developed an extremely magnificent imaginary world based on this.

Chapter 284 The Devil’s Conjecture

Biologists have discovered natural conditions that are conducive to the birth of life from inanimate matter, and even directly created the source of life in the laboratory. Miller's simulation experiment is like the first step for mortals to get involved in the realm of divine creation;

Astronomers have demonstrated the principles and commonness of planet formation, and irrefutably established the fact that a large number of stars have planetary systems. The Hubble Telescope has discovered countless new stars and planets;

People have discovered suspected traces of life on Mars, and have confirmed the laws of life evolution through their own research. As a result, all disciplines agree: the evolution of life should be a common event in the universe.

However, this conclusion was slapped in the face by the facts.

There seems to be no non-artificial traces in the silent universe; countless observations cannot find any evidence of the existence of aliens.

Lu Yanchi took a deep breath.

He decided to organize his thoughts again.

First of all, what can be determined is: the facts must be correct, because facts are the foundation of everything. If theory contradicts facts, then it is the theory that is wrong, not the facts.

Lu Yanchi pulled out a piece of draft paper and carefully wrote the words "theoretical error".

Based on the understanding that the facts were correct and some theories were incorrect, he began to think about a question:

Which theories are at fault?

Is it organic chemistry, biochemical synthesis, theoretical biology, evolutionary biology, planetary science, or astrophysics?

Or, to go even further, these theories that people obtain from observing nature actually have huge flaws at their foundation?

The germ of human science, the foundation of human science, comes from observing nature and summarizing laws.

So, are the so-called "natural laws" really the laws of the original birth of the universe?

What is the difference between natural and artificial?

Lu Yanchi wrote the words "natural and artificial" on the paper.

As science advances, the age and size of the universe have been revised many times by science on Earth. The direction of this revision is generally very similar: the age and size of the universe are always underestimated.

Recently, scientists have given another estimate of the age of the universe. This time they believe that the precise age of the universe should be 13.82 billion years old. The first generation of stars that appeared in the universe should have appeared 12 billion years ago.

If the first generation of civilization appeared in the universe when the first generation of stars appeared, that is, 12 billion years ago, then what would this civilization that has flourished for billions or even tens of billions of years be like? appearance?

Someone in the scientific community once put forward a bold hypothesis, believing that quasars and pulsars may be manifestations of the activities of extremely powerful cosmic civilizations.

However, even this exaggerated assumption seems to be oversimplified. A simple calculation can show that if the earth continues to develop at the current rate, it will only take a few thousand years to reach the level of such extreme "astroengineering" activities - with the blessing of the extraordinary ability of the spiritual system, maybe this time It can even be shortened significantly.

What about thousands of years later? What exactly will a civilization that lasts millions of times longer do and what kind of great power does it possess?

In less than 10,000 years of development of human civilization, the natural world of the earth has completely changed. Conquering and transforming nature are the most proud successes of human civilization;

As for civilizations that have developed for hundreds of millions of years, how far will their "conquering and transforming nature" progress?

…Can we change those “natural laws” that we take for granted?

Lu Yanchi stared at the five words "natural and artificial" on the draft paper, and couldn't help but fell into deep thought again:

What is the difference between the so-called "natural" and "artificial"?

Everything is composed of atoms, this is nature; the speed of light is constant, this is nature; the universe expands, this is nature; forces interact, this is nature; universal gravity, this is nature...

The rise of high-rise buildings from the ground is artificial; the spacecraft is artificial; the Internet is artificial; the decoration of clothes is artificial; the high-speed rail cars are artificial...

If we deeply examine the concept of "nature", nature should be the limits that cannot be transformed by artificial means.

However, when artificial transformation capabilities reach an unparalleled level, will those "limits that cannot be transformed artificially" still be limits?

At this time, what is the difference between the so-called "natural" and "artificial"?

The universe is already 13.82 billion years old. During such a long time, why did those pioneering civilizations not transform the so-called laws of nature?

If this is the case, then could the universe we observe today be one that has been planned by other civilizations?

A universe that has been transformed?

Search [Reading Assistant] official address: www.kanshuzhushou.com to read millions of popular books for free without advertising for life!