Rebirth of England

In his previous life, Barron knew that the relationship between Israel and the United States was the closest.

It can even be said that no country can make the United States so protective - many times, in order to protect Israel, the United States does not hesitate to be enemies with all other countries.

Since 1972, the United States has used its veto power dozens of times in the UN, and has done its best to obstruct any resolution that is unfavorable to Israel. In many cases, even the "Five Eyes Alliance" countries including Britain and Australia can't stand it, and would rather abstain than vote on the side of Israel, but the United States stands firmly on the side of Israel, even if it will harm the interests of the United States.

At that time, Barron was still puzzled by this - has the Jewish group's control over the United States reached this level? This is somewhat exaggerated.

But now, Barron has understood many of the reasons.

In fact, the United States did not support Israel so strongly from the beginning of its founding...

Although the United States supported Israel at that time, the strength was not that great - after all, Israel itself is an important part of the United States' Middle East strategy. The United States said a long time ago that "if there is no Israel in this world, we must invent one to protect our interests in the region..."

Later, the United States became more and more indulgent of Israel's many extraordinary actions.

Therefore, some people call Israel the closest "son" of the United States. The United States treats it like a beloved rebellious son, tolerates all the willfulness of the other party, and tries its best to protect it.

Some people also think that Israel is the "father" of the United States. The United States supports Israel without reservation and complies with many of its requirements...

For example, in September 1953, Israel at that time ignored the UN resolution and tried to build a canal to draw water from the Jordan River.

At that time, US Secretary of State Dulles immediately announced the suspension of diplomatic aid to Israel. The effect of the US threat to Israel was immediate, and Israel terminated the drinking water plan a month later.

From many examples of the same period, we can see that Israel did not occupy a special position in the US alliance system from the beginning.

Although the United States had been providing large-scale aid to Israel since its founding, the way of "aid" at that time was similar to its relationship with allies such as Japan and South Korea today. The United States was able to effectively control Israel's behavior at that time.

Just like in 1956, the United States could easily persuade Israel to withdraw the territory it had seized from Egypt. This interference ability enabled the United States to benefit from the conflict between the Arab world and Israel, and to control the Middle East by playing the role of a judge. This was also the original intention of the United States to support Israel.

However, since the mid-1960s, the US policy in the Middle East has begun to tilt uncontrollably towards Israel. The most important sign is that Israel has tried to make the United States acquiesce in its possession of nuclear weapons.

In 1963, Kennedy, then President of the United States, began a protracted confrontation with Israel over the development of nuclear weapons. Kennedy's tough opposition threatened Israel's nuclear program several times. It was not until Kennedy's successor Lyndon Johnson came to power that things suddenly took a turn for the better.

In 1968, Richard Helms, then Director of the CIA, reported to Johnson that Israel had in fact acquired nuclear capabilities.

It is said that Johnson was very irritable at the time and just wanted to get rid of him from the White House as soon as possible...

Normally, if such a thing happened in the interests of the United States, Johnson, as the President, must take action - but obviously something made him very hesitant about his attitude at this time.

Therefore, Kennedy's "brain hole" and the conspiracy theory that there was a Zionist figure behind it were not unfounded.

Since then, America's support for Israel has become more and more generous, and has never stopped even when it is contrary to American interests.

Moreover, America's doubling of support has not only failed to increase Washington's influence on Israel, but has declined.

For example, in order to get Israel to agree to support UN Resolution 242, the Nixon administration did not threaten to stop aid, but privately guaranteed to provide it with additional fighter jets.

In addition, after Israel occupied the Golan Heights in Syria, despite the opposition of almost all countries, including European allies, the United States once again stood on the opposite side of the world and helped Israel withstand international pressure - this is undoubtedly undermining the rules of the post-war world system set by the United States itself.

In the same period, there is also a lot of evidence to show that the relationship between the United States and Israel has indeed undergone subtle changes since the mid-1960s.

All these changes are closely related to the continuous expansion of the influence of the American Jewish group, the backing of Zionism.

In fact, according to the relevant information collected by Barron's think tank, the so-called "Jews" are not a "nation" as many people think, but more precisely, it is actually a "social organization" with closely linked interests.

The so-called "Jews" living in Israel now, which may account for the vast majority of people, have nothing to do with the Jews persecuted in Europe during World War II.

They just used their ability to control the media to spare no effort to publicize to the world the persecution suffered by the "Jews" during World War II - as if the whole world owed the Jews, so that any remarks unfavorable to the Jews could be labeled as "anti-Semitism" and "Nazi behavior".

If you make a comparison, you can know how terrible the result of the Jews doing this -

Even though Germany had such a profound reflection on the Nazi behavior after World War II, now a German facing the Jews can be said to be trembling with fear, and if you are not careful, you will be labeled as "anti-Semitic" by the other party because of your words.

As for other countries that were invaded and massacred by Japan in World War II, even if the number of people involved was far higher than that of the Jews, not many Westerners in the world cared about it...

In the United States and even the world, the Jewish group firmly controlled the media - once the famous American international relations theorist Mills Heimer once wrote a book "Israel Lobby and American Foreign Policy", which originated from a paper commissioned by "The Atlantic Monthly" in 2002.

But after the article was completed, it could not be published for a while due to undisclosed reasons.