Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

The sky outside the window is bright.

Lu Zhou, who was kneeling on the desk, slowly opened his eyes.

After seeing some sour eyebrows, he looked at the calendar on the corner of the table.

It’s all in May...

Lu Zhou shook his head with some headaches.

From his arrival in Princeton in February, he spent almost half of his time in this ten-square-meter house. Apart from driving to the supermarket to buy food, he basically did not go out.

What made him most distressed was the $5,000 club card, which he hadn’t even used.

After receiving the task, for nearly half a year, he has been challenging the Goldbach conjecture.

Now, all this has a result.

Taking a deep breath, Lu Zhou stood up from the chair.

He went to the last step, but he was not so anxious.

Taking a little song into the kitchen and making some food for himself, Lu Zhou even took out a champagne from the refrigerator and opened the bottle cap to pour himself.

Champagne was bought two months ago, for this moment.

After enjoying the dinner quietly, Lu Zhou calmly went to the kitchen to wash his hands, then returned to the desk and began to finish his work for a while.

After nearly fifty pages of papers, he continued to write where he had fallen asleep yesterday.

... obvious, we have px1, 1px, x11612pxx, p, xq2xlog4...30

From Equation 30, Lemma 8, Lemma 9, Lemma 10, it can be proved that Theorem 1 holds.

The so-called theorem 1, is the mathematical expression of the Goldbach conjecture defined in his paper.

That is, given a sufficiently large even number n, there are prime numbers p1 and p2, satisfying np1p2.

Similar to it is the Chen's theorem np1p2p3, and a series of theorems about pa, b.

Of course, although in his paper, this formula is called theorem 1, it may not be long before the mathematics community generally accepts his proof process, which may be upgraded to the "land theorem". Something like that.

However, this major mathematical conjecture review cycle is generally longer.

Perelman proved that the Poincaré conjecture paper was recognized by the mathematics community for three years. The proof of the ab guess is a lot of "mystery terminology". At least the review threshold must first read him. The "cosmology theory" is an introduction, so no one has read it until now, and it is expected that the future will be very difficult.

The speed at which a major conjecture is reviewed depends to a large extent on the probabilities of the proposition and to what extent the work is “new”.

In the proof of the twin prime number theorem, Lu Zhou did not use a particularly novel theory, but the topology method mentioned in the paper published by Professor Zelberg in 1995 was innovative, and the paper has been studied. People can quickly learn what he did.

The paper that proves the Polignan's theorem is obviously a long stretch.

Even though his group construction method has been embodied in the proof of the twin prime number theorem, the composition of the magic modification also makes it far from the scope of the screening method, even if the reviewer is a big cow like Deligne. It took a lot of time to make the final conclusion.

In this paper on the proof of Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou wrote a total of fifty pages, and that it took at least half of the space to discuss his theoretical framework for the whole proof.

This part of the work can even be published as a single paper.

To a large extent, his review cycle depends on the interest of others in his theoretical framework and his acceptance of the theoretical framework he proposes.

As for how long it takes to be specific, it is not something he can control.

In fact, Lu Zhou used to think about what the system is for the task completion criteria.

If he completes the proof of a theorem, but ten years or even decades, no one approves his work. Does it mean that his task has to be stuck for so long?

What he does not understand most is that since the system's database contains huge amounts of data, it must come from a higher civilization. At least this civilization is more developed than the civilization on earth.

Without discussing the motives for its existence, Lu Zhou feels that if a problem is solved, the system from higher civilizations should not refer to the opinions of “indigenous”.

In this analysis, Lu Zhou concluded that the completion of the system task should be determined by two factors.

One is correct.

The other is public!

In fact, there is a very simple way to verify that his proof is correct.

If it is only for publicity, it does not have to be sent to the journal...

......

After completing the paper that proved Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou spent a full three days, sorting the paper on the computer, and converted it into a pdf file, then landed on the official website of arxiv and uploaded the paper.

Correctness, he has more than 90% of the grasp, because his habit is to carry out a rigorous check on each conclusion, and repeatedly scrutinize all possible errors.

As for disclosure.

Arxiv without peer review is undoubtedly the fastest choice!

The only drawback may be that it conflicts with the submission principles of some journals and conferences. For example, uploading a paper before the deadline may violate double-blind rules, etc., but Lu Zhou is not very concerned about these things now, and he believes that the journals that receive the manuscripts And will not care about those details.

After all, the contributor is no longer a nameless pawn, but the winner of the Cole Number Theory Award. The academic results of the report are not obscure work, but the Goldbach conjecture in the eighth question of Hilbert 23, one of the crowns of the analytic number theory circle after the Millennium puzzle!

After two days, he will reorganize the paper, solve the problem in the format, make it look a little more comfortable, and then submit the mathematics annual magazine.

When I first proved that Wiles’s paper on the proof of Fermat's theorem was tried by six reviewers, Lu Zhou did not know that his paper would be reviewed by several big critics, but it should be no less than four. Right?

Looking at the pop-up uploading pop-up window on the webpage, Lu Zhou took a deep breath.

In this way, even if it is done publicly?

After the paper is published, people or research units that focus on this field will receive an alert similar to the reminder. Not surprisingly, somewhere on the planet, someone should have read his article.

I don't know if there is a judgment value for the reading of the paper. If it exists, it will take a few days to verify his guess.

Sitting in front of the computer and waiting for a cup of coffee, Lu Zhou closed his eyes and took a deep breath and whispered.

"system."

When he opened his eyes again, his eyes were pure white.

It’s been a long time since I returned here last time, so that this time I came in this place, Lu Zhou even felt a little uncomfortable.

Walking to the semi-transparent holographic screen, he reached out to the taskbar with a hint of embarrassment.

Soon he can verify his guess...

At the same time, you can also know whether your own ideas are correct.

and many more……

Just then, Lu Zhou suddenly realized a problem.

If the system does not respond to itself, is it a description of the conditional analysis of the task completion judgment, or is there a problem with the paper itself?

However, the system did not give him time to think about it.

It sounds like a natural sound.

Then, a line of text caught his eye.

Congratulations to the host, complete the task!