Superstar

\"&

Nicholas' admiration of "before sunrise" and admiration of Hugo. This is not unexpected; to everyone's surprise, Nicholas used such a poetic way to present the essence of the movie to all readers. He is about the movie The understanding of the subject is so profound and special. It makes people want to repeat reading. It's like the movie "Before Sunrise".

Nicholas wrote a sentence in the foreword. "This is a movie worth savoring. It's like a glass of mellow red wine. Only when you really calm down can you feel the beauty of the tip of your tongue."

This sentence is so simple, so nonsense, so boring. But it also sums up the advantages of "before sunrise" vividly and truly.

The "Los Angeles Times" gave a high score of 9.5. This is almost the highest praise for a bold and innovative film-even if it is not a full score of 10. But in fact, film critics who arrived in Park City to attend the Sundance Film Festival spoke highly of the film "Before Sunrise". For example, Rogerbert.

Rogerbert is one of the most authoritative film critics today... He has always been the most supportive of Robert Redford’s Sundance Film Festival. He will definitely arrive in Park City every year to participate in the film festival. And he will do his best. Write a comment on each entry. Because in the depths of Roger's heart, his love for movies is the most important. There are often many classics in independent films. He is eager to let the world discover these classics.

For example, "Pulp Fiction". Another example is "Before Sunrise".

"This is a very special movie. It is different from the usual romantic movies that create illusory dreams, bubble romance and bizarre plots. Director Richard Clett and screenwriter Hugo Lancaster use The simple and plain plot, multi-angle and multi-level dialogue, and a slightly lazy idealism with world-weariness, constitute a classic masterpiece that can definitely stand the test of time.

Lines. This is the only narrative technique of the film. It is not dominated by images in the traditional sense. It uses a flat and straightforward linear narrative. It tells the story of a pair of young people spending a wonderful night in Vienna together through dialogue. It starts with the meeting of a man and a woman on the train. It ends with the breakup of the two at dawn. Space is very limited. Time is shorter than ordinary love. Such a small and short time and space. There are only two protagonists. But the story is told. Vivid and vivid. It shows the quality of the work.

Men and women have been in contact with each other from the very beginning of the encounter. The dialogue runs through the whole night. They talk about life, love, marriage, family, life and death, religion, destiny, men and women, themselves... They put the eternal topic of human survival into one. During the chats of romantic couples, the audience will have a better understanding and understanding of the two protagonists of the film in these dialogues. At the same time, they will also examine their current situation and predicaments through these exchanges.

Within a hundred minutes of the entire movie. All are spent chatting and walking between the two protagonists. There is no bizarre twists and turns and ups and downs of ordinary romance movies. There are only large sections of dialogue. There is no entertainment of ordinary romance movies. Functionality and features. But this is exactly the case. But under the profound performance of the director and the two protagonists, we can feel the dialogue; the powerful role as the most important part of the script.

The two protagonists of the movie are set very distinctively. One is a sensual woman living in Paris. The other is an American man living in New York. The difference in regional temperament and the imprint of local culture are gradually gradually over time again and again. Reflected. The romantic and delicate in France and the pragmatism of the United States, the sensibility of women and the rationality of men show a strong contrast. This contrast also increases the drama. It deepens the theme: the source of difference in love is deep-rooted. But It is this difference that attracts each other. At the same time, they maintain their own personalities. This is the only way to complete the love puzzle.

Therefore. When dialogue, dialogue and dialogue happened to these two people, countless sparks burst out. From not knowing each other to becoming dependent and inseparable lovers. The two people talked, talked about everything, and communicated and arranged. Their inner anxiety, confusion and even fear. Their dialogue is simple and casual. There is no deliberate or pretentiousness. However, they inadvertently convey their most true thoughts and the appearance of their souls. The two people are communicating while communicating. An abstract spiritual speculative discussion. On the one hand, the love between two people spreads, ferments and deepens with the gentle night. The importance that Linklater conveys to the audience in this way is far more important than ‘alcohol and drugs. Goods and chaos. sex;.

Although the plot of the story is plain as water, Linklater still sets up different scenes and different characters in the streets and lanes of Vienna. It makes people not feel boring and at the same time. It also reflects the cultural and romantic heritage of Vienna. It has become two protagonists. The starting point for the collision of ideas.

From the train to the bus. From the record shop to the coffee shop. From the roadside bench to the open grass. In this way, the two people chatted and chatted. While passing by one strange scene after another. This kind of treatment is very symbolic- In our lives, we will always go through some stages. When we look back, the past that was once thought to be unforgettable is nothing but a splicing of trivial and small fragments. Sometimes it’s not regrettable to miss something. Because we can’t produce deep memories without in-depth understanding; sometimes we have something but don’t cherish it. On the contrary, we are tired of being too familiar.

People are so contradictory. And Linklater cleverly places a pair of characters in a defamiliarized scene. The novelty generated by this will make the other two protagonists excited. Feel the value and meaning of existence. So the story is also There is a basis for continuation.

Under Linklater's connection, it jumped out of the sensory stimulation that Hollywood movies have always pursued. Presented a unique work to the audience. The movie discusses all immaterial things such as life, dreams, and philosophy. Some. Esoteric is also a bit boring. But it is precisely the element that happens in our lives every day. Therefore, when dialogue became the theme of the movie, there was no touch of life and death. There was no romance of a mountain alliance and each other. There was no ups and downs in the plot. But men and women still reached a spiritual understanding in this exchange. It starts from plain and ends with plain. But the charm hidden in the picture is a long aftertaste.

When they tried each other. After avoiding, hesitating, worrying, fearing and tempted, they finally accepted each other. In the beautiful and charming night of the park grass, they completed the unity of body and mind. When the audience thought it would be the perfect ending to a happy romantic love story, Linklater gave another unexpected but reasonable open ending.

At the last moment when the man and the woman said goodbye to each other. They did not leave contact information. Instead, they agreed to meet at the same platform at the Vienna railway station on the same day six months later. Although the audience was surprised, it was in full compliance with the romantic characteristics of these two young people who like to be complicated. But the problem is. Linklater didn't tell us whether the two met after half a year.

The suspense left by Linklater returned to calm with the empty shots at the end of the movie, as if nothing had happened. When writing the script, Lancaster jumped out of the old routine of living a happy life in general love stories. He tried to explore more metaphysical things in the form of love stories. Love is just a means.

As the ancient Greek philosopher said, one cannot step into the same river twice. The encounter, acquaintance, acquaintance, and love of men and women. At that time, when things are changing, things are different. Will they have the feeling that "the only way is ordinary at the time?" But time cannot be reversed after all. All the ideas can only stay in the psychology of the audience. Let them supplement and perfect with their different life experiences.

Women say to men at night. It seems like the time we are together. It belongs only to us. It is our own creation. It must be like I am in your dream. You are in my dream.

The movie is over. The audience's aftertaste has just begun. This is what Lancaster bestows on this movie.

Finally, I have to talk about the performance skills of the two actors. The large number of long shots and dialogues in the film is a huge test. But not only did the director and the actors show their timidity. On the contrary, they perfectly demonstrated the profound artistic grasp of the two actors. Classic

The whole movie revolves around them. The camera follows the two people completely. But it doesn't give the audience any sense of unreality. The fluency of the lines seems to be the normal state of daily life. From the unfamiliar traction to each other, to the reluctance of parting. The scale of the performance is controlled properly.

I especially liked the performance of two people in the record store. In the small space of the audition room. The lens has always maintained a bottom-up shooting angle. We saw two people in such a lens of'the air is thin; They are attracted to each other and keep their distance with restraint. While enjoying the gaze of each other, they can't help but catch the dots of each other's eyes. The whole standing is vividly reflected in a long lens. Isn't this a kind of intimidation? Striking romance.

Under the test of one long shot after another, the two actors Lancaster and Theron showed everyone their understanding of the role. And those small details are even more impressive. Lancaster is because of the hair. The small gesture of raising the hand and sweeping Theron’s hair behind the ears when you are blocked and unable to see Theron. Just such a small detail makes people throbbing. This is also an important factor in the success of the movie~www.wuxiaspot.com ~ Lancaster once again dedicated an amazing performance. A man's casual, unruly, childish, chic, melancholic, entangled in his eyes and the corners of his mouth are delicately and vividly outlined. Before realizing it Will be deeply fascinated by him; and Theron's performance is a surprise discovery. Women's sex. Sensation, laziness, small temper, delicate, free and easy, mature, through those charming eyes, I have fascinated countless people.

Does love pursue eternity or moment? In the movie, two people are too late to choose, and time draws a deep gulf between each other. They chase time. Hope to become eternal at this moment; they are also waiting for time. Because they have said goodbye. Goodbye has become an inevitable ending. They enjoy an unreal encounter like a dream. They are also constantly struggling to call for help under the oppression of reality.

This is the tension of time. It is also the force of reality. Lancaster showed such a true meaning in a love movie. This is the meaning of the script. This is the meaning of the movie. The aftertaste is far-reaching. ".).