Superstar

The entire press is now in distress. Although they can blame the National Inquirer and Anthony, the people are not fools without IQ. This time the incident is presented so clearly and completely in front of everyone, the dilemma that Hugo faces is in direct sharp contrast with the gloating faces of the media, which really pales in any defense.

The reporters can clearly feel that the sight that falls on them is full of playfulness and contempt. This sight is not threatening, but it makes them uncomfortable. The press card and camera that made them extremely proud of Cameras and cameras have become hot potatoes at the moment. They only hope that their reporter status will not be recognized.

From the uncrowned king to the mouse on the street, such a huge gap has caused media practitioners to really block, have they ever encountered such a situation? But this is the social reality, and it is also the consequence that they must bear in their eagerness for quick success.

In such a situation, the "New York Post," "USA Today," and "Houston Chronicle" that did not participate in this battle have always insisted on blocking the alliance but the fisherman has benefited. Under the difficult situation, he chose to stand by and let this time. The artillery fire did not affect them.

But the fact is not so.

Obviously this time the storm of public opinion is aimed at all news media. The "New York Post" and others blocked the alliance as a major national newspaper. They, the "New York Times" and the "Los Angeles Times" shoulder the responsibility of public opinion leaders, and their cold eyes are also on the sidelines. It is the negligence of social supervision duties and the accusations that other media need to face. Naturally, they can't stand alone.

Regardless of this point, the "New York Post", "USA Today", "Houston Chronicle" and other banned alliances have not gained any advantage, and it can even be said that they have suffered heavy losses.

Why did Colin Mailer reject Brandon's report proposal, and why did newspapers such as the "New York Post" fail to mention a word during the period when the news focus was at its peak? Of course it is not because they are not interested, and it is not because of their sense of social responsibility that they refuse to report, but because they are trying to block Hugo and block the "death row".

These newspapers were to complete the task of banning and teach Hugo a severe lesson, so they endured the immense suffering and heavy pressure and ignored the entire news event. This silence is strategic for several newspapers. Significance.

But now, with the uproar of the whole incident, the blockade alliance has become useless.

Hugo was too involved in the filming process and required psychological treatment. This can definitely be called blockbuster news. Hugo, who won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor and the Cannes Actor, is currently under 35 in Hollywood. A representative of the acting prowess, Hugo became a popular candidate for the Oscar actor in March of this year. Although Hugo witnessed Tom Hanks’s re-election, he did not become the first actor under the age of 30. The first person, but Hugo's strength is still obvious to all.

So, what kind of character and what kind of script is it that can actually make Hugo crazy? Overnight, the discussion about the "death prisoner's walk" spread uncontrollably.

When people learned about it, they discovered that "Death Row" actually appeared out of thin air. No one knew when Hugo took over the film, and no one knew any news about the entire crew, let alone. People know what Hugo's role and the whole story are all about. Before that, even a little clue was not exposed in the media.

Of course, ordinary people will not think that the news media has blocked the news. They will take it for granted that the crew's secrecy measures are in place and they are deliberately following the mysticist route, so they went into filming silently. This has also stimulated the curiosity of the people.

At this time, the "Los Angeles Times", "New York Times", "Washington Post", "The New Yorker" and other news media all saw the time and made detailed and vivid reports on the "Death Row" and the entire crew They were all introduced thoroughly, and the veil of mystery was unveiled bit by bit.

Produced by Steven Spielberg! Directed by Tim Robbins! Starring Susan Sarandon and Hugo Lancaster! Adapted from real historical events! Tell a story about the self-salvation of death row prisoners! Explore the meaning of death penalty!

After every detail was announced, people's astonishment took a step forward. Such a work with countless gimmicks didn't make any noise before that, which is truly a miracle.

More importantly, the two leading actors, Susan and Hugo, are both Oscar-level powerful actors. Even the director, Tim, is not inferior. They gathered in such a heavy and profound script and collided. The sparks and chemical effects produced are enough to make everyone look forward to.

Especially when people learn that this is based on real events, countless people are curious about the role played by Hugo, and even more curious about the context and outline of the whole story. Driven by recent hot topics, nun Helen Prekin The sales of the original book "Death Prisoner's Walk" soared. In just one week, 30,000 copies were sold. The additional effect is really amazing.

Everyone is trying to understand the role prototype played by Hugo, and what kind of difficult challenges Hugo faced.

In just two weeks, "Death Convict Walk" has become the most watched work in recent days. Even the crew hasn't finished yet, some people believe that this work will make a difference at this year’s major awards ceremonies. Such a work with strong players, profound themes, and strong artistic flavor can definitely be said to be the favorite of the old scholars of the academic school.

With the self-reflection of the news media, the attention index of "Death Convict Walk" has continued to rise, even surpassing the final work in the late summer period, becoming the most anticipated work of many audiences in the second half of the year: everyone is wondering what Hugo has contributed. Movies of the same level. The huge pressure of expectation continued to increase along with the expansion of the entire incident, which also made the topic of "death prisoners walk" directly broken.

If we lose our horses, we can't know what's wrong. This is clearly the case with "Death Row".

If the crew announced the start-up news of "Death Row" step by step before then, it would definitely arouse discussion. After all, the entire production cast was too large, but the effect would not be as sensational as it is today.

People will pay attention to this work, but at the same time they will also notice that this is only a work with an investment of 10 million US dollars, but a small-cost literary work. There are not one hundred and eighty similar works in the North American film market every year. Except for the acting showdown between the two leading actors, the film itself does not have too many gimmicks.

On the contrary, it will make people a little disappointed, disappointed that Hugo chose a small-cost investment work instead of a commercial blockbuster like "Future Water World". Although the "future water world" is a mess, people are very curious about what Hugo will perform in such a big production, and whether it can turn the tide.

In this way, the focus is completely blurred, and the topicality is not enough. But at this time it is completely different.

When the "National Inquirer" focused on "Hugo Madness", the development direction and fundamental nature of the whole topic changed drastically.

People are no longer concerned about the cost of the film, nor the lineup of the film production, but the film actually put so much effort into the actors, and even caused Hugo to show symptoms of confusion. This shows what? On the one hand, it shows that the acting performance of the film is wonderful and exciting; on the other hand, it shows that the test of acting skills by the characters is unprecedented in history, so that the actors are fully engaged and challenge their limits.

People are curious about Hugo’s performance, curious actors’ duel, curious about the quality of the finished product, curious about the depth of the work... Thanks to Hugo’s frequent excellent works in the past few years, not only the performance is impressive, but the thickness of the work is also worthy of scrutiny. So how much power does "Death Convict Walk" such a sensitive work as being selected by Hugo?

What's more, this is the second work of DreamWorks.

The original focus has now become a plus branch, and the original weaknesses are not enough at this time, and the original points are now infinitely magnified.

"Death Prisoner's Walk" easily achieved an unparalleled publicity effect. This is an effect that cannot be achieved with tens of millions of publicity expenses, and it is also a positive stacking effect, which is definitely a big victory.

For Colin, the original idea of ​​blocking the alliance has gone bankrupt at this time. The "Death Row" does not require any form of publicity at all, and it already has an incomparable appeal. Every action in the next movie will attract the attention of the audience, not to mention Said the movie's attention when it was released.

Moreover, no one will underestimate the huge network of contacts behind the Big Three of DreamWorks~www.wuxiaspot.com~ Now that the suppression of the blockade alliance has been completely dismantled, will they still have an advantage when "Death Row" is released. ? No, obviously not. If they do not report, they will only be excluded; and if they report, then blocking the alliance will be reduced to a huge joke.

The situation of advancement, retreat, and defense has now become a shackle to imprison themselves. Although there is no communication between the blocked alliances, they all know clearly that all this is over, no matter if they continue to block or not, "Death Prisoners Walk" "The crew will not care. On the contrary, the so-called blockade of the alliance will become the object of ridicule by colleagues.

Of course, Colin can at least be fortunate that the National Inquirer and Anthony have attracted most of the firepower, and they will not be too embarrassed.

This situation caused Colin to be in his throat. The "New York Post" completely lost the initiative in this incident. If they reported it, they would face the situation that Qianfu pointed out; if they did not report, they lost their wife and broke down. What's more speechless is that if they report, at least the sales of the previous issues will break the table, but now they have got nothing.

It can be said that there is no winner in this breaking news event. As for Hugo, he has never been a winner. He puts himself in a state of confusion for his role. No one can understand and experience his pain and suffering.