Superstar

No one will be satisfied with the list of the Golden Globe Awards-except for the winners, not only because the expected winners did not appear, but because the Golden Globe cake sharing technique is really terrible. The awards of the six major acting departments are even more inconsistent. The only one that is slightly more reliable is the title of Nicholas Cage's drama actor, at least in terms of performance completion and relative strength. It is well deserved, but in the context of the entire list of winners, it makes people laugh and cry.

People have already begun to discuss enthusiastically, at this year's Oscars, will Hugo, who once again attacked the actor and actress, lose to Nicholas? If this is the case, then this entanglement is really unclear. More importantly, this possibility is very large.

Nicholas's deep and heavy performance in "Far from the Casino" really won a good reputation. When the film was released at the end of October, many people thought that it was likely to bring him an Oscar actor statuette. At that time, the "Seven Deadly Sins" were in theaters, but Hugo's Anonymous was definitely attacking the supporting role department, posing no threat to Nicholas, and the legendary "Death Row" had not yet been opened, so Nicholas deservedly became the number one candidate for the actor. .

Even after the release of "Death Row", people generally believed that Nicholas and Hugo are equally equal. Although from a technical point of view, Hugo has the upper hand; but the acting skills can accurately express the role regardless of the level of performance and let the audience. Feeling the power of the role, even if it is a true performance, it should be praised, so in terms of the degree of completion of the role, Nicholas is indeed not inferior to Hugo.

Now, the Golden Globes gave their answer. They chose to support Nicholas and gave Hugo an ironic best actor in a musical comedy. This also made the Oscar two months later even more unpredictable. .

The reason why "U.S. Weekly" reported with such radical headlines as "Ugly Results" was obviously not just because Hugo was alone.

In the competition for the best screenwriter, Hugo, who played "Before Sunrise", lost again, losing to Emma Thompson, who wrote "Sense and Emotion", and also the "Death Row". Tim Robbins and Allen Sorkin of "White House Pocahontas".

What does this mean? It means that Hugo, who was infinitely beautiful during the nomination stage, finally won a painless best actor in a musical comedy based on "Before Sunrise", and "Seven Deadly Sins" and "Death Row" returned empty-handed.

Should this be celebrated or shouldn't it be celebrated? Charlize Theron, a co-actor of the same drama who accepted the award on behalf of Hugo at the Golden Globe Awards, did not say anything about the award, but simply said "Thank you" and it was rushed. This is because Charlize is acting as the leader. Human relations, or Hugo’s true attitude?

No one knows whether the final list of the Golden Globes is directly related to Hugo's absence-even if there is, people don't have any evidence, but there is no doubt that the future relationship between the Hugo and the Golden Globes It started to become more and more interesting. Will Hugo attend the Golden Globes next year?

Regardless of what will happen next year, at least this year, the news media do not intend to easily let go of the Golden Globe Awards. The comments of "U.S. Weekly" have won the support of countless media reporters.

Of course, the media reporters are not fighting for Hugo alone-they are not so friendly, but because the awards of the Golden Globe Awards in the acting department are really unbelievable, which makes the Hollywood Foreign Press Association almost fall into a situation that has been pointed out by others. .

"From'Scent of a Woman' to'Yihai Xiongfeng', from'Sleepless in Seattle' to'Schindler's List', from'Pulp Fiction' to'Before Sunrise', from'Seven Deadly Sins' to ' "Death Convict Walk", Hugo Lancaster has contributed eight absolute masterpieces in the past four years. In these works, he has portrayed characters with different personalities and distinct images. By virtue of his delicate and restrained but explosive performances, Created one classic image after another on the screen.

Especially in the last year, Hugo's acting skills ushered in a full explosion. The chic and casual but gentle and slender Jesse, the calm and elegant but cruel and **** Anonymous, the brutal but fragile and painful Matthew, Hugo has injected three roles into three roles. The irreplaceable soul, let these characters walk out of the screen, come to our side, telling the true story.

Maybe it’s too early to discuss Hugo’s position in film history, but there is no doubt that Hugo can definitely be called one of the best contemporary actors, especially considering that he is only twenty-eight years old. At his age, this report card is terrifying.

It’s hard to imagine that eight completely different movies, eight different styles of characters, and eight superb performances have only brought Hugo a Golden Globe Award for best actor in a musical comedy. It’s not a death row. The acting that baptizes the soul is not the acting that makes the soul tremble in the'Seven Deadly Sins'. It is just the best actor in a musical comedy.

This is Hugo's final transcript after a four-year journey of eight nominations for the Golden Globe Awards.

Such ugly results have made all languages ​​lose their color. We only need to look at this list of winners quietly, and then make our own judgments in our hearts.

I can't help thinking: Maybe Hugo made the right choice. "

This report from the "U.S. Weekly" is undoubtedly sharp and sharp, pointing all the fingers at the Hollywood Foreign Correspondents Association, but this report with extreme views is irrefutable. Indeed, perhaps purely from the roles played by Nicholas and Hugo, the award for "Far from Casino" is the least controversial award among the six major acting departments. Even the "U.S. Weekly" did not mock Nicholas - because of them. Knowing that this is due to Nicholas's strength.

However, the awarding of any award is not that simple. Taking Oscars as an example, in addition to the actor's strength, the actor's contribution to Hollywood is also a major factor. In other words, it is the "guilt vote", such as Jeff Bridges Was Jeff's performance in "crazy. heart" in 2009 the best performance of his career? Obviously not. Prior to this, Jeff had won four Oscar nominations for acting, but he got nothing, so in that year, he defeated the more outstanding performances of Colin-Firth (.) and Morgan-Freeman, Won his first figurine.

From this perspective, Hugo's eight Golden Globe nominations for four years have only received such a result, which is really infuriating. This can definitely be called the Golden Globe's insult to Hugo Chigogo.

Therefore, the report of "U.S. Weekly" not only did not cause controversy and crusade, but also won the support and applause of the media colleagues.

In addition to Hugo, the other names in the list of awards are also helpless.

"Sharon Stone defeated Susan Sarandon, Meryl Streep and Emma Thompson with acting skills. Very good. This is an eye-catching title." This is from the "Chicago Forum" The headline of the report is full of black humorous mockery. Indeed, no matter it is placed in any period of history, such a title has a strong mocking effect. Even if people agree that the performance in "La Gambling" is the best performance of Sharon's career, it must be added with a prefix-career. The only outstanding performance, and even more eclipsed in front of competitors.

"Who is Mira Sorvino? And, has Woody Allen released a new work?" This is news from the winners of "Variety" magazine complaining about the best supporting actress. On newcomers, Kate Winslet is in The stunning performance in "Sense and Emotion" has aroused numerous discussions so far; on senior actors, Anjelica Houston, who has been nominated for Oscar three times and won best supporting actress in 1985, is still outstanding this time, and Mira's stand out is confusing-of course, when you see Woody's name written in the director and screenwriter column, you may be able to explain this situation.

"The struggle between reason and emotion, emotion won the final victory." This wise news report from the "Hollywood Reporter", the most professional magazine in the industry, said in the press release:

"Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which has always been extremely skillful in Tai Chi, has once again dedicated a perfect performance, two best film, best director, six acting departments, best screenwriter and other ten awards, the only overlap is Won the "Sense and Emotion" of the best film in the drama category and the best screenwriter. Ten trophies belong to nine films. This is definitely a night for all the works to win.

But this time the performance of the Golden Globes I'm afraid it was a mess.

"Sense and Emotion" who won the best film in the drama category, "Baby Pig" who won the best film in the musical comedy category, and "Brave Heart" who won the best director. These are three completely different works. The core theme, the filming techniques used by the director, and the thoughts shown by the characters in the story ~www.wuxiaspot.com~ are all different styles, but the Golden Globe Awards honored these three works at the same time, which shows the Golden Globes generous mind At the same time, it also reflects the uncertainty of the Golden Globe Award for the awarding ideas and concepts.

When the Golden Globes thought that they had successfully hosted a national carnival, they had lost the core of the award ceremony in the spotlight, and turned into a bustling puppet show: cheers were extremely enthusiastic, but the stage It's just a puppet without a soul.

Looking at the entire list of winners, the only winner is ‘Sense and Emotion’, and their number of winners is two. This is lost and sad for an awards ceremony. "

Generally speaking, a winner will be born at the awards ceremony, and at least three trophies will be accounted for, otherwise it will only seem difficult to convince the public-the winner of the best picture actually only gets another affirmation? Does that mean that the so-called best film is not so good, is it the same quality as other works?

Therefore, the "Hollywood Reporter" pointedly pointed out the greed and missteps of the Golden Globe Awards, not to mention the six acting departments that have become a laughing stock.

The 53rd Golden Globe Awards came to an end, but such a result is hard to rejoice.