Superstar

\"&　"This is definitely the new king of crime movies! "Almond Camby expressed his position at the beginning of the film review. Not only did he personally overthrow his concerns at the end of last year, but he also personally pushed the movie he once despised to a new height. The amazing fun of shooting a case runs through the whole movie. Surprise, humor and ingenuity run through the incredible one hundred and fifty-four minutes of the whole movie. It is sensational and wonderful! Best of 1994! "

As the most watched comprehensive newspaper in the United States, the film reviews of the "New York Times" have always received a lot of attention, and they tend to easily become the icon of a movie's reputation. Therefore, generally speaking, "New York Times" film reviews are more cautious. But this time, Almond obviously did not intend to conceal his surprise and admiration. He gave almost all the words of praise to "". First he gave himself a slap in the face, and then he was willing to become a stepping stone for the movie to become a classic.

This has almost become an abbreviation for the reaction of the entire film critics after the release of "".

Prior to this, the "New York Times" praised "" the most, thinking that this film is an epic that pioneered a mountain, and it is also the best work so far this year, not one of them. But now, Almond has personally rewritten this view, for which he also wrote a follow-up film review.

In this film review, Almond believes that "" is a masterpiece of the American spirit. The epic shooting technique is impressive, but in general, the film is still too the main theme. There is no novelty in the above, and it has not reached a new height in terms of ideological exploration. The essence of this movie is still the most classic American dream.

But "" is different. It can be said to be the pioneering work of a new type of film. Perhaps in terms of ideological realm, this film is not profound, at least slightly inferior to "", but the film reflects American culture. The history of the development of, film, and music has left a deep American mark. More importantly, the way of telling stories, the way of presenting pictures, and the means of creating conflicts are all new creations, which are enough to make the entire film industry undergo a radical change.

Therefore, Almond believes that "" will occupy an unshakable place in the long river of film history. Just need this movie, Quentin can go down in history.

At the end of the film review, Almond also specifically mentioned Hugo, “The selection of films is novel and unique, and people gradually see his ambition as an actor. What’s more commendable is that Lancaster’s dedication this time With the flowing water, profound and delicate performances, after "the courage to challenge myself again, the wonderful performances run through, the Cannes actor deserves his name."

So far, the disagreement between the "New York Times" and Hugo due to "" has officially come to an end. Almond gave the film a full 100-point evaluation, using the sentence "perfect" as a summary without any reservation. The ground gave its own highest praise.

Almond’s point of view has been strongly supported. This famous top film critic has already praised "" as early as Cannes. His detailed analysis of the inside and outside of this film has been regarded by countless fans. The Bible, and he has personally watched the movie for the sixth time, but he still has no idea.

This time, "" was released in the United States, and Roger also came to join him again. In the comment column of "Chicago", he undoubtedly gave a full score of 100 points and gave him a four-star recommendation. This is a "high mountain almost insurmountable in movies of the same type".

In the film review, Roger said, "It's like", "It's a movie that can't remember the next plot even after you watch it more than a dozen times. The non-linear narrative method plus the talented, Violence is enough to call this movie a "classic"!"

As one might expect, Roger compared "" with "". He believes that "pulp fiction" is bound to have an immeasurable and powerful influence on the film industry in later generations, just like the classic published in 1941. It may even produce a whole new genre.

There are countless people who hold the same views as these two big film critics, and there are endless voices of praise.

"" thinks, "This is a wonderful movie, from beginning to end. This kind of movie is like a rare novel. After you start to read it, you will always involuntarily confirm how many pages are left. Then you hope there is more, not less." They also gave a perfect score of 100.

"" said, "Talentino seems to have a wonderful ability to make all casual and boring dialogues cooperate to achieve the greatest comic effect and release infinite charm. What's more rare is the action scenes. It's just like the literal meaning, it makes people heart!" The evaluation of 100 points is still not stingy.

The "Wall Street Journal" commented, "This is the most creative and imaginative movie since the 1990s!" The evaluation is still 100 points.

"The Globe and Mail" stated that "'" has at least three movies in one, and each one is eye-catching." The full score is 100, no exceptions.

"Reel Viewing" commented, "In this movie, the advancement of each act is deeper and richer. Tarantino has made all film lovers appreciate an absolute masterpiece," Undoubtedly it is the biggest this year. Surprise." They also gave out a perfect score of 100 points ~ www.wuxiaspot.com ~ has always had the "" comment, "" is not interesting, but interesting." If you don’t understand people I thought it was a criticism, but after seeing the 100-point evaluation, I knew that this was a newspaper-specific style again.

Even before that, the "" who had never lied about Hugo's works before, gave out in an unprecedented way, "For a cruel movie depicting Los Angeles gangs," bloomed a dazzling fascination. Wonderful light."

The most authoritative professional magazine in the United States, The Hollywood Reporter, wrote a film review, “This is the first masterpiece produced by post-modern pop culture. Every time you watch it, it will be wonderful. Just like good rock music, you must sing it louder.” They not only grasped it accurately, but also penetrated the cultural attributes of Hugo into it, and coupled with the comments with a perfect score of 100, you can clearly see the professional views of this magazine.

In addition, the "Variety Magazine", which goes hand in hand with the "Hollywood Report", is a lot more serious, but this time they have not been able to remain calm, "This is a movie full of countless flashes. The wonderful movie that I watched again, is the kind of "he will never let people down" script and the "expectation is always underestimated" works. Tarantino let people see his talent, Hugo let people witness his great.".