Technology: breaking the hegemony that monopolizes the world

But not all Western media are positive, and even most of them are not positive and honest media.

As a highly politicized and privatized media, marketization will naturally lead to the bad business practices that often occur in the market.

Ignoring science, ignoring the truth, talking nonsense and wantonly smearing.

Relying everything on ideology is to call for objective, neutral, and free speech Western media.

For example, if a western celebrity says that the high-speed railway construction in Daxia is great, faster and more high-tech than Britain and the United States, then this person will be labeled as pro-China by some big media.

Western media often use a very deceptive persuasion routine: be objective and neutral in small matters, and carry private goods in major matters.

So some media, such as the New York Times, published a very interesting headline - "Are foreign systems safe?"

The content of the article is actually very "neutral", and the importance of the mobile phone system is written very professionally, but at the end the painting style suddenly changes.

Android and Pingguo are our own family members. We can choose to believe that the Gonggong system is foreign. Should we put so much private information on outsiders' company servers?

That's demolition, a company founded by a country with cameras all over the street and no privacy whatsoever.

When Gu Qing saw this report, he suddenly felt a little dull.

Yes, that's the feeling after it's over.

Although he couldn't recite the full text of how these foreign media slandered Huaxia in his previous life, there were quite a few who watched it.

But no matter how these crows call, they can't stop the Gonggong system from being installed on the phone...

The 7nm process lithography machine manufactured by Kyushu Technology SS1MB light source has successfully taped the Kirin 990 5G chip on the new production line of Xiaxin Technology.

And because the wafers are supplied by Daxia manufacturers, the price is very "family", and the quality is also strictly selected. The yield rate is very cute under the processing of the new lithography machine.

With the top lithography machine, low price and very good yield rate, will the mobile phone chip be worse?

The Kirin HiSilicon chip can be mass-produced by Xiaxin Technology. When Mr. Ren heard the news, he was very happy and secretly drank two mouthfuls of Erguotou.

Of course, HiSilicon is not the only player in domestic mobile phone chips, and there is also a big player-Lianfake.

It can also be regarded as a well-known manufacturer of mobile phone processors. Ryukyu Lianfa joined the Android Alliance in July 2010.

At that time, Android was still a new operating system. Although the bet was right, in the next market competition, due to the supply chain and corporate background, most mobile phone manufacturers chose Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, and then the two An ambitious company, Pingguo's independent chip, Xia Wei's HiSilicon Kirin chip.

However, although not many manufacturers are used, at present, there are only five manufacturers in the world that have the ability to independently develop and design high-end mobile phone chips, Qualcomm, Pingguo, Hanxing, Hisilicon Kirin and Lianfa.

Now the landing of domestic lithography machines is like the opening of a new track.

Kirin has mature experience in hardware matching and adaptation, and can supply chips to other manufacturers, and LianTek can do the same.

It's just that there are some problems. =

Now mobile phone manufacturers using Qualcomm chips switch to LianTek chips, so the adaptation of system algorithms to hardware and software cannot be ignored.

For example, one of the most important signs of flagship smartphones now is the camera function.

The quality of the photo effect does not only depend on the quality of the lens, the CPU processor also participates in the photo algorithm, the higher the pixel, the higher the requirement on the CPU.

In addition, Lianfa has a lot of criminal records. Old news such as PPT chips, high power consumption, unstable performance, and high prices make mobile phone manufacturers dare not sign up for large quantities.

So is this market given to the HiSilicon Kirin family?

of course not.

Tsinghua Unigroup is also making chips for mobile phones, but they are not high-end, focusing on the Indian and African markets.

As for the ppt chip of a certain meter?

That's really just a gimmick. Designing chips can't be done in two or three years, unless all patents such as architecture and design are licensed.

As a large household appliance manufacturer, Kyushu Technology needs CPUs for sweeping robots, and bionic mechanical prosthetics also need chips to run intelligent programs.

Therefore, Kyushu Technology's Titanium chip is only handed over to Xiaxin Technology for its own use, and it is not sold outside. Of course, the performance and manufacturing process cannot be compared with the latest Kirin chip.

This is a backhand, and Gu Qing does not intend to use it casually. After all, the semiconductor industry is too large, and it is impossible for Kyushu Technology to eat chips from the source to the factory.

If there is a day, then it will be spun off, or Xia SASAC will enter.

Lianfa has a dark history, but Ryukyu Province is a province of Daxia, Lianfa is still a company of Daxia, so now many mobile phone manufacturers are also using Lianfa chips to develop mobile phones for this part of the market.

Mastering the latest lithography machine can clamp down on chip foundry companies and chip design manufacturers, and the mobile phone manufacturers supplying these chips are naturally impossible to give Kyushu Technology a bad face on the bright side.

So a new round of tests for domestic mobile phone manufacturers has come.

The Gonggong system open source part of the authority, only charges 1% of the profit on the system software as management optimization fee every year.

Will the domestic mobile phone manufacturers follow?

Either continue to be a good boy of Google, or enter the Kyushu technology circle to play.

As for what Google does with Android, such as charging fees or what, that's even more impossible.

The EU Competition Directorate is investigating Google's abuse of Android's market monopoly position and exclusive pre-installation of Google's own search, application market and other services.

Of course it's not a secret.

A large number of Android phones are preloaded with a series of Google applications when they leave the factory, because manufacturers must obey Google's requirements.

The reason for Google's opposition is simpler: Android is developed by Google, which has spent a lot of resources, pre-installed its own applications for free, and charged platform advertising fees is almost the only way to make money.

Of course, Gu Qing agrees with Google's statement, but he is not optimistic about Google's ability to escape unscathed.

After all, Microsoft has also been fined for bundling IE with Windows systems before.

It is even more impossible for Android to change the profit model and charge for authorization, which involves the kernel of the Android system.

The Android kernel uses Linux, which needs to follow the GPL v2 agreement. Not only can it not be closed source, but the newly added code must also be open source, and third-party manufacturers can use and modify it.

In other words, if Android wants to charge fees, it needs to start a new stove and redevelop a new Android kernel. For Google, it is simply picking sesame seeds and throwing away watermelons.