The Rebirth of the Internet Celebrity Godfather

"The following are the mainstream views supporting Zhou Xiaoxuan. Let’s analyze them one by one."

"First, whether what the police determined is the truth."

"Some supporters of Zhou Xiaoxuan firmly believe that the facts determined by the police and the facts determined objectively are two different things. Even if the police find no evidence to prove that Zhou Xiaoxuan was sexually harassed, it cannot prove that Zhu Jun was not sexually harassed. There is just no evidence."

"The fact that this view is so popular shows that it has some truth."

"I also admit that it doesn't mean that there is no crime, but it doesn't mean that there is. The law is about acquittal beyond a reasonable doubt."

"The fallacy of this logic is that this group of people only see the limitations of the police's determination of facts, but ignore the limitations of their own determination of facts."

"People's understanding of the objective world is limited, so there are indeed situations where the understanding of facts is inconsistent with the objective facts, and this may also happen to the police."

"But compared to ordinary individuals, or, let me put it bluntly, compared to some netizens who read small essays and take advantage of me, the law uses a set of procedures and methods to try to determine the truth after the fact.

The optimal solution found by human beings is far more reliable than subjective guesses based on some empathy through a short essay and across the Internet."

"Therefore, determining facts through the law is still the most common choice in human society, and it is more worthy of trust!"

"If you don't believe the facts given by the police, that's fine. Please provide more accurate and authoritative evidence than the police!"

"I actually very much agree with the idea of ​​letting everyone see the existence of the problem. Only when you see the problem can you solve the problem."

"Fourth point, someone raised a question: A woman who encountered XSR in a closed space did not anticipate the occurrence of XSR, had no audio or video recording, and did not resist or struggle with the other party. So how can she prove whether she has experienced XSR? She

Can I just endure all this and pretend it didn't happen?"

"If we let Zhu Jun be ruined today because of a small essay and be criticized by thousands of people, what about us?"

"This question also has a large audience, because they are all worried that they will be violated, and they are unable to defend their rights because there is no evidence."

"I can find a woman at random, give her enough money, and ask her to go to the police station to falsely accuse me. As long as the money I give exceeds the price she pays, I believe she will be willing to do it, so this is not the truth.

Truth is not broken so easily."

"If you stand up from the perspective of all women's rights and interests, you should naturally have a duty of prudence to maintain the public's trust in this form."

"I can make up several of the same words, such as:

A child does not sacrifice his own growth and risk being beaten by his parents by not doing his homework.

"If you stand in the wrong place just to vent your personal emotions and satisfy your personal demands, it will destroy the public's trust in the form of 'standing up', and will increase the cost of safeguarding rights for more women, hurting the public.

More women’s interests.”

"So this point of view is not suitable for her, let alone defending her."

"Because the spirit of the rule of law is individualistic - it emphasizes concrete analysis of specific cases, procedural justice, confrontation between the two parties and the provision of evidence, and the spirit of presumption of innocence in criminal matters."

"goodbye!"

A boy will not risk his conscience and being caught by his girlfriend by going to the movies with other girls.

"Now, I still adhere to my original point of view. Everything must be based on evidence and police reports."

"Now please open Baidu and search for the words "woman lied about being raped". You will find that there are many counterexamples. This is my search interface."

“But are ‘coming forward’ and ‘seeing that the problem exists’ necessarily linked?”

"Okay, that's it for this video, our next video -"

"Friends, today's Zhu Jun will be tomorrow's kings!"

"It can even be said that the more someone advocates this point of view, the more they should oppose her, because the women who put forward this point of view see the problem and want to protect women's rights, but Zhou Xiaoxuan's move is destroying women's rights. The two parties should be

Natural enemies, aren’t they?”

"On the other hand, I would like to ask, for a man who was alone with a woman in a closed space, he failed to anticipate the subsequent false accusation. There is no audio or video recording, so how can he prove whether he has been falsely accused? Is he just

Can he endure all the accusations and slander just because he is a man?"

"Obviously not!"

"If you don't, there is no factual basis, and you are willing to believe a story about a powerful man coercing and persecuting a weak woman just because of collective empathy or a predetermined position, then I'm sorry, this is just a story!"

"Third, just standing up and speaking out makes sense."

"I have also released a video before: "Beware of Fraudulent Accusations"."

"While XSR can cause untold harm and pain to victims, false accusations can also have a devastating impact on a man - even if he does not go to jail for it, he may lose his job, cause disgrace in the public sphere, and even shadow him for life.

.”

"Just imagine, if someone suddenly accuses you and says, "Four years ago, you forcibly kissed me on the roadside," how can you prove that you didn't? Or, in other words, if one of your girlfriends comes forward and says that during a certain connection

, she said that she was forced and that you raped her. How can you prove that you did not force her, but that she did it willingly?

"Even if you can prove it, why should you spend a few minutes writing a short essay while others spend a few minutes to prove your innocence?"

"Is this statement true?"

"We cannot let the Internet become a routine for judging cases, and we cannot let the form of essay writing be so rampant. Judicial justice is the greatest justice!"

"Then what's the point of standing up like this? My evaluation is: you'd better stand back!"

[picture]

"So, this sentence is neither the truth nor objective fact or empirical summary. It is just an inflammatory, fictional, and somewhat stereotyped sentence. Some girls value innocence very much, but

It cannot be applied to all women, it is not universal, and it cannot guide our judgment on this incident."

"Is it an objective fact? Is it an empirical summary?"

[photo]

"Rumors without factual basis."

"Will it definitely have a positive impact?"

"Then looking back at the Zhou Xiaoxuan and Zhu Jun incident, which kind of person came forward? Does she have evidence? Did she fulfill her duty of care? None of them, right?"

"I think this sentence lacks a precondition, that is, it only makes sense if you are on the right side!"

"First, let's judge the nature of this sentence."

"They empathized, but they didn't fully empathize."

"Baidu Encyclopedia explains the rumors like this!"

The United States will not repeatedly create wars and conflicts in the international community at the expense of its national interests and risk the resentment of people around the world."

"I have always felt that upholding the law is the obligation and responsibility of each of us, because the law will eventually affect each of us!"

"I said in that video:

As a qualified netizen, in an environment where information and emotions are spread massively, we must cultivate reading comprehension skills and correctly identify the information in essays. Be vigilant about whether the information is true and comprehensive, and whether the expression is objective and rigorous. When it is impossible to tell

When it comes to the content of the essay, let’s not rush to take sides, but let the bullets fly for a while and refer to the police report.”

"The second mainstream point of view is also mentioned in my introduction: A girl will not risk her innocence and legal liability to falsely accuse a man. If she does, it will definitely be true."

"They said that as long as they stand up and speak out, it is meaningful, and they will promote the development of women's rights and make contributions, so that more people can see the current situation of women and the existence of problems."

"Or, to use a more accurate term: rumors!"

"So, isn't this a rumor? Everyone has freedom of speech, but it is not the freedom to spread rumors."

Before the video, Tan Mei, who was in her late teens, had already burst into tears. During this period, she and her husband had suffered too many injustices.

Zhu Jun also had tears in his eyes. He looked at the handsome young man in the video and murmured his name:

"Cheng Yi, Cheng Yi?"

He did not expect that his once close friends were now avoiding him for fear of being influenced by him, but a young man he had never met took risks and spoke up for him.

Thank you, Cheng Yi, thank you.