The Treasure Hunt of an Antique Dealer

Zhang Nan is of course not interested in that **** Longinus gun. What high-quality weapons can the Roman Empire have in 29 or 30 AD?

　　 With his eyes, no!

　　 At that time, the Roman emperor was the adopted son of Octavian Tiberius. The Roman emperor’s direct army had already prepared iron daggers. The quality seemed acceptable in Europe, but it was actually quite scumbag.

　　 Today, more than 1900 years later, there is actually "Ha-Roman Empire-Ski" boasting there, saying that the Roman Empire army has all used steel weapons, and what the **** is super awesome pattern steel!

　　 Blow it, anyway, you can't blow it.

　　 Those Haroists didn't know, or deliberately assumed that they didn't know the historical fact that the Roman Empire had been short of iron.

　　 pretend to sleep, you can't wake up.

　　 The supply of iron ore in the Roman Empire basically relied on the Middle East colonies and the Gaul region, which was always insufficient. In the second century AD, a large number of Roman armies used bronze weapons.

　　 Not to mention that the ancient Western world did not develop the softening of cast iron and the technology of frying steel, and the military weapons have always used block iron.

Is there any pattern steel?

　　 Absolutely, Damascus is in the Middle East, not too far away. It is quite normal for the Romans to get some points, at most it is the personal weapons of individual high-ranking generals and nobles.

　　 The iron technology of Roman Smelting itself is not high. Legend has it that when Brother **** was still alive, the hardest goods in Roman military weapons could not reach the Vickers hardness of 200.

　　 For hundreds of years, the sword has been the first weapon of the Roman army in close combat. Compared with the Chinese bronze sword, the quality of the Roman bronze sword is like the goods in the Yiwu small commodity market in the early 1990s, which gave him a bad impression anyway.

　　 Bronze weapons stepped aside, Zhang Nan couldn't even look down on the iron daggers of the glorious era of the Roman Empire, let alone guns and spears that were generally not made with the top metal processing technology.

We must know that during the same period, not to mention the steel ring first sword equipped by the Han army in the early Eastern Han Dynasty, even if it was 300 years in the morning, the toughness of the inside and the outside of the bronze weapon of the Qin army had reached an astonishing hardness. Vickers hardness of 290.

The gun of Longinus is also famous. Legend has it that as long as the gun is held in hand, everyone within a 120-foot radius will surrender. Those who hold this gun can dominate the fate of the world, but those who lose it will immediately Kill.

　　 Holy Spear?

　　 The scholar's deadly gun is almost the same!

　　 Zhang Nan doesn't believe this, but he believes: If you want others to submit to yourself, it depends on your strength!

　　 Insufficient strength but carrying treasures, unless you hide it and let others know it, otherwise the ending will be unhappy.

　　In reality, this Ronginus gun still has three handles, because the original was broken into three pieces, and the three pieces were continuously rebuilt by the kings of all dynasties and generations in Europe.

　　 Now one is kept in the Hofburg Museum in Vienna, the second is in the Augustinian Church in Rome, and the last is in the Greater Glastonbury Abbey.

　　The holy spear is of great significance in the Western world. Is this Vaius made of a blade of the holy spear?

　　Is the sword that I just discovered that used to be the tip of its spear?

　　 It is possible to create it many times and divide it with a little bit of material, but Zhang Nan doesn't care, who likes Taoism?

　　 This will be on the battery car that just entered the tunnel, Zhang Nan talked about something that came to mind.

　　 "I seem to have seen in a book that Charlemagne slaughtered Germans. I was not impressed with this. I didn't take a closer look at that time, but I remember that Charlemagne was admired very much in the Third Reich.

　　 is a bit contradictory in every way. "

　　 Jerry Gooden Cowan heard this and said, "Yes, boss, the historians of Na (river crab) are also very contradictory.

　　 The ethnic groups in European history are actually difficult to subdivide, because they are all randomly assigned by the Romans.

　　 The war in the early Middle Ages, to put it bluntly, was a conflict between a group of tribes.

　　 As for the Rome meeting, it won’t be better, just a little trouble.

　　 During the heyday of Rome, there were 28 Manchurian regiments, each with a maximum of 6,000 professional soldiers. With the same number of auxiliary legions, at most 300,000 people were preparing for battle throughout the year.

　　 If you count the barbarian mercenaries, urban garrisons, and local militias without legions, the total strength may exceed 800,000 in its heyday.

　　 But apart from dealing with Hannibal, the Romans did not launch a battle with a number of 100,000. Most of its opponents were simply scattered tribes.

　　 But even so, the Romans failed to completely unify Central and Western Europe, and their ability to assimilate was too poor.

　　 The Roman army is basically infantry. I know that during the same period of China, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Mobei, fought against the Huns. The number of elite cavalry deployed at one time exceeded 100,000, the auxiliary troops were 300,000, and there were uncountable logistics personnel.

　　 The Roman army has poor mobility and lacks a little aggressiveness and determination to eliminate all opponents. Just like their attitude towards the northern barbarians, they have never completely solved the problem.

　　 At the time of Charlemagne in the eighth century, this European civilization was going backwards. A group of cultureless people fought with each other. The battle of tens of thousands of people was a super war. On both sides, a small number of knights and a group of farmers were fighting.

　　 hitting, they didn’t escape the same ethnic category set by the Romans at the beginning, but they were fundamentally different from each other.

　　 In "The Eagle Over London", there is a section describing Moustache's attitude towards Britain, saying that he gave Anglo-Saxon a chance to surrender, a country second only to the Aryans, but if Britain doesn't appreciate it, then conquer it!

　　 In fact, starting from the distinctions made by the Romans, the British and Germans were actually Germanic people at the time, but obviously there was no unity, because there was no unity at all.

　　 This is a contradiction, and even the attitude of the Third Reich to Charlemagne is very contradictory.

　　 One of the Germanic branches went to Britain in the 5th century. It is now the Saxons. In order to distinguish between them, the historians call the Saxons who settled in Britain the Saxons.

　　 At that time, the Yangglu people went with them, and they were also a branch of the Germanic people.

　　 In 772, Charlemagne launched a war of conquest against the Saxons who remained in the European continent, fought for almost 32 years, and finally completely conquered the Saxons.

　　 However, he ordered the execution of about 4,500 Saxons in 782. At that time, any member of the Germanic tribe who did not believe in Christianity would be executed by Charlemagne.

　　 In 1935, the Third Reich built a stele specifically for this massacre more than a thousand years ago. Charlemagne was defined as an enemy of traditional Germanic culture and a model of the evil of the bishop.

However, this kind of demonization propaganda of Charlemagne is very short. At that time in 42 years, Na (river crab) Cui celebrated his 1200 anniversary of his birth. UU Reading www.uukānshu.com turned Charlemagne into a symbol of German superiority. , There is also a French volunteer force named Charlemagne's regiment.

　　 is inconsistent, because Charlemagne is the enemy of the Germans to the ****, but he is also his own. There is no way to subdivide it. It depends on the needs of the ruler.

　　 It's a pity, Europe is such a big place. The Romans were strong enough at the beginning, but the enterprising spirit and cultural influence were too bad.

　　 If it can have assimilation as powerful as the Chinese Han nationality, then there may be a superpower in the whole of Europe now, and then a few small countries will be added nearby..."

　　 Europe, so many countries, is really messy! Had it not been for the discovery of the New World, he would continue to chaos.

　　 Zhang Nan also sighed in his mind: "It's a pity!"

　　 Jerry is a pity that Rome did not unite Europe, while Zhang Nan was reigning for the discovery of the New World.

　　 If there is no discovery of the New World, Europe in this society is probably not much better than the Middle East.

　　 No, it should be even more chaotic than the Middle East in 20 years!

　　 While talking, the underground station arrived.

When parking, Rick came over with Li Panfeng. The latter said to Zhang Nan who got off the car: "Boss, most of the boxes in the two trucks are gold and precious metal products. Most of the personnel in the troop carrier are works of art. Found something special."

　　The horizon is high, this golden train is really nothing special in Li Panfeng's eyes.

　　:. :