This director only makes bad movies

The video quickly progresses to Francis and Xu Nan entering the cinema together.

Francis also specially took pictures of the inside of the theater, and it can be seen that the attendance rate is not low, almost 40%, which is better than ordinary movies.

What follows is a dozen seconds of footage inside the theater. Francis filmed a few seconds of what was on the big screen, and then filmed a scene of him and Xu Nan watching the movie.

In the end, it was a scene of him and Xu Nan walking out of the cinema side by side.

Francis' big face once again takes up most of the screen.

Only this time, this face was filled with embarrassment, shame, and shyness.

"I seem to have really watched the wrong movie, and I have always wrongly blamed Director Xu Nan."

"'300' is really good-looking. Although it is shoddy and has a few gangbusters, the unique flavor and profound connotation are the same as the first two movies."

"Maybe those vulgar ordinary people will think this is a bad movie, but I want to say that this movie is definitely not a bad movie. The reason why other people don't watch it is because they don't know how to appreciate and understand this kind of movie. Beautiful and sublime.”

"It's you who can't do it, not the movie, so please don't say that copycat movies are bad."

"Finally, I want to apologize to Director Xu Nan. He misunderstood him and kept verbally abusing him. I was wrong and I'm sorry."

In the video, Francis looked extremely sincere and ashamed, realizing that he had made a serious mistake.

He even bowed to Xu Nan to show his sincerity in apologizing.

But as soon as this bow started, he was stopped by Xu Nan.

"It's not your fault, it's mainly my fault that Schneider's name was too misleading. My movie is called "300", and his is called "300". Many people misunderstand that the two movies are the same. Ministry, let alone you."

"You just made a mistake that everyone makes, and I don't blame you."

Xu Nan continued: "Furthermore, you like my movies, and I'm not happy enough. I will continue to work hard to make more and better movies in the future. I hope you can continue to support me in the future."

Francis immediately promised: "In the future, as long as it is your movie, I will buy a ticket and go to the cinema to watch it as soon as possible. I will also post movie reviews, call on fans to watch your movie, and find ways to let more audiences know about it."

"Thank you." Xu Nan thanked him.

The progress bar of the video had reached the end, and Francis' face appeared on the screen again: "Director Xu Nan is so good. Even if I watched the wrong movie, even if I often insulted him online, he still didn't take it to heart. superior."

"His mind is as broad as the sea, and his character is brighter and flawless than the bright moon in the sky."

"He was so gentle, I cried to death."

"I declare that I will be a fan of Director Xu Nan from now on, and I will still be a super fan."

At this point, the video ends.

Schneider's eyes widened, and his expression was speechless.

Is there any mistake? You dare to post such an outrageous video?

Do you believe the content in this video?

From seeing the wrong movie, to tens of thousands of people signing autographs, to this apology after watching the movie, it was all hype from beginning to end, no one in the industry can tell.

I have used this trick several times, and you are still using it, and you are still using it so calmly and shamelessly!

What is the difference between this and a thief shouting to catch a thief?

Viewers probably won’t believe such an outrageous video.

Schneider read the comments below the video.

"So Xu Nan is a person with such a good character?"

"His personality is so gentle and reminds me of my father."

"Xu Nan in the video is so gentle, not at all like what is described on the Internet."

"It seems that the rumors are not reliable. Many people in the entertainment industry say that Xu Nan is not good. But after watching this video, I found that he is quite good."

"I declare that I will be Xu Nan's fan from now on."

After reading this one-sided comment, Schneider was almost speechless.

No, just one video, do you think Xu Nan is a good person?

What can a video mean? The people in the video can be actors, and the video has been edited. What can this mean?

But there is no way, the audience is so stupid.

An illiterate person can become a top student by relying on marketing and be admired by a group of students. In comparison, this marketing is nothing.

Hollywood, or to be precise, entertainment companies around the world often engage in this kind of marketing. Many people can become popular and become pure goddesses with just a photo or a short video of a few seconds.

However, this kind of marketing is effective, and the audience is like a fool, believing whatever it says.

Although this video is full of loopholes in the eyes of insiders like Schneider, the publicity effect is really good.

Xu Nan's image was actually changed like this.

Schneider even found that this video was trending on Twitter. Although the ranking was very low, the impact was not small.

Netizens don't know if he was poisoned or what happened, but they all think Xu Nan is a good person.

Just outrageous.

The more he looked at Schneider, the angrier he became, so he simply stopped looking and buried his head in rest.

There will be movie promotion tomorrow. The promotion can only stop when the popularity of "300" subsides and no matter how much promotion is done, there is no way to increase the box office.

While Snyder was taking a break, Paramount, the film and television giant, finally began to exert its strength.

They spread the image of Schneider being questioned by young people at a promotional event to the Internet, and it was reproduced by several major media and Internet celebrities.

Moreover, Paramount also spent money to buy hot searches and spread this matter to as many netizens as possible as quickly as possible.

This is the powerful energy possessed by Hollywood film and television giants.

Then, the matter exploded.

The audience is not stupid.

Or to put it another way, some viewers are stupid, but some are smart.

After the video of this young man questioning Snyder at a movie promotion event spread online, it quickly reminded people of the last time the two movies "Atlantic Rim" and "Pacific Rim" collided.

The last time "Atlantic" became popular, it relied on a joke.

Director Benjamin, why did you make the movie "Atlantic" so poorly?

I know you didn't make "Atlantic", so why did you make the movie so bad?

Now that this situation occurs again, there is no doubt that it must be Xu Nan's doing.

Regardless of whether he did it or not, Paramount will guide public opinion and make everyone think that Xu Nan did it.

Hollywood film and television giants still have this ability.

Public opinion quickly became one-sided.

"This Chinese director thinks the audience is a fool, and he's starting to play this trick again."

"Director Snyder, why did you make "3000" so poorly? To be honest, this joke is not interesting."

"This is not a joke at all. I don't want to fall for the same trick a second time."

"To be honest, I found the "Atlantic Rim" plot very boring last time, and I didn't expect it to come back again."

"He seems to be good at everything except making movies."

"You're wrong upstairs. It's because he's not good at making movies, so he has to be good at other things, otherwise he won't be able to make money."

"I hate this person very much. He can exist in the entertainment industry, and I feel like my IQ is rubbing on the ground."

"It's obviously hype, but this kind of hype seems a bit unethical."

In addition to these spontaneous comments from netizens who have been guided, some Internet celebrities also tweeted to criticize Xu Nan.

"From "The Age of the Hobbit" to "Atlantic" and then to "3000", this Chinese director always comes up with jaw-dropping tricks, but he seems to have forgotten the most important point. , a director needs to rely on his work to speak for himself.”

"There is no doubt that this Chinese director has no directing talent at all, so he can only rely on crooked ways to get everyone to watch the movie. Every time he promotes the movie, it reminds me of a prostitute hiding in a dark alley, eager to pick up customers. .”

"When he first came to the United States, he claimed to teach all American directors how to make movies. But now, several months have passed, and we only see a clown performing."

Even director Benjamin, who filmed Pacific Rim, sent a tweet criticizing Xu Nan.

"There is no doubt that he can't make movies at all, so he can only rely on various marketing to promote the movie. But even in marketing, please be sincere and don't do the same trick twice."

"By the way, the meme about why Benjamin made "Atlantic Rim" so poorly is so silly. I can't understand why it became popular in the first place. Fortunately, the popularity of this meme has passed now."

But what Benjamin didn't expect was that the most popular comment under his Twitter was actually the old joke he mentioned.

"Director Benjamin, why did you make "The Three Thousand Spartans" so poorly?"

After seeing that this comment had become the most popular comment among a group of netizens who did not take it too seriously, Benjamin threw his phone in anger.

It’s been so long and you’re still not done yet.

On the Internet, the public opinion environment can be described as one-sided.

This is mainly due to Paramount, the Hollywood film and television giant. As long as they want to, they can instantly make a person blacker than black.

This is just a small test.

And there are many people who dislike Xu Nan, especially people in the film and television industry.

They struggled hard and fought hard, but they just couldn't make any money. As a result, you, a Chinese, made money easily by relying on deception and abduction. This is very embarrassing.

If you don't make you look bad in public opinion, how can you get over the hurdle in your heart?

The next day, Schneider participated in an interview event to promote the film.

In the process of chatting with the host, it is inevitable to talk about "300", a movie that is very similar to "300" in terms of name and plot.

The host asked directly: "Director Snyder, what do you think of the movie "3000"?"