Time Travel: 2014

When they have a pretty good impression of each other.

Hu Xin and Lin Hui chatted.

Small talk before getting to the main point of the interview is not entirely useless.

Hu Xin introduced Lin Hui to the people accompanying her on this trip.

After all, Hu Xin is not alone in this trip.

Besides her there were several other staff members.

Lin Hui also noticed these staff members.

Among these staff members, there is only one person who is responsible for writing records.

There was even a camera guy.

This surprised Lin Hui. Wasn't it an interview with a newspaper?

Why is there a camera crew?

Lin Hui expressed his doubts about this.

After Hu Xin's explanation, Lin Hui understood.

"Digital Youth" is a sub-publication of China Youth Daily.

Although most of the time it is reported in text.

But for some articles that have received a relatively large response in newspapers and periodicals.

The video of the interview may also be excerpted and shown on the China/Youth Online website.

Ordinarily, this matter is just a very insignificant matter.

But it slightly disrupted some of Lin Hui's previous preparations.

Although Hu Xin had already communicated with Lin Hui about the questions to be asked during the interview.

But for the same question, the answers prepared for the text interview are obviously different from the answers prepared for the video interview.

The answers prepared for the written interview can be rational and objective enough.

You can even elaborate on the reasoning behind something.

After all, the audience of text reports is willing to use their brains to think logically when accepting the information conveyed by text.

I am willing to explore the foundation and find the logical chain behind the interviewee’s words.

Because reading itself is a very rational behavior.

Not exactly the same as the act of reading.

When people accept the content conveyed by videos, they usually have more or less perceptual thinking.

That is to say, when people obtain information through videos, they often judge the value of the content mainly based on perceptual judgment.

In this case, if you pay too much attention to theoretical speculation when conveying content to the outside world through video interviews, it can easily backfire.

Video content should focus on meaning and impact.

rather than internal logic.

Speculative explanations in videos can easily be taken out of context.

This will cause a lot of unnecessary trouble.

Since the interview may be presented in the form of a video.

Then it seems that Lin Hui should adapt to the format of video reporting when accepting interviews.

To be honest, Lin Hui is actually very repulsive to video interviews.

Once a written report is written, no one will take it out of context.

And if the video is made public, who knows how it will be edited by unscrupulous public accounts?

On the other hand, it is a video interview.

Some "micro-expression masters" are also keen on interpreting many things through micro-expressions.

It would be fine if it was truly a well-intentioned interpretation.

The problem is that many times this kind of interpretation is just trying to incriminate someone.

This malicious interpretation is disgusting.

Lin Hui still remembers that in his previous life, an old professor he respected very much was asked in a video interview what he thought about the development of artificial intelligence that would make some people unemployed?

Experts just state their opinions very objectively and rationally.

The answer is actually watertight.

The answer itself doesn't necessarily have any problems even if you look at it with a harsh eye.

But as the saying goes, if you want to impose a crime, there is no excuse.

You can always find the advantages in something by looking at it with appreciation.

Looking at problems with a critical eye can always find fault with something.

In the eyes of some "critics" who are too full to hold on.

Just because the old professor behaved very calmly and showed no unnecessary expression during the interview.

They are all interpreted as indifferent to humanity and indifferent by some people with ulterior motives.

How exaggerated is it reasonable for an old man who is nearly seventy years old to have an exaggerated expression?

The accusations made by those boring people were simply outrageous. Her mother opened the door for outrageousness - it was so outrageous.

With such a precedent, Lin Hui has always been relatively resistant to video interviews.

Anyway, as a person who pays more attention to speculative logic.

Compared to video interviews, Lin Hui prefers logical written explanations.

What's more, as a handsome guy.

Video interviews can easily be understood as relying on appearance rather than strength.

Perhaps only a group called "book friends" can understand the trouble of being too good-looking.

Although I am reluctant to accept video interviews.

But this kind of thing can't be avoided until the first year of junior high school.

Lin Hui was in the process of walking from behind the scenes to the front of the stage.

Sooner or later you have to step into the spotlight.

If you can't handle such a video interview, let alone going to a bigger stage in the future.

Lin Hui confirmed with Hu Xin some of the issues to be discussed in the interview.

Lin Hui silently drafted the manuscript.

Not long after, Lin Hui saw that the staff traveling with Hu Xin had adjusted the camera position.

At 8 o'clock, Lin Hui had almost finished the draft.

Lin Hui signaled to Hu Xin that the interview could begin.

After receiving the signal from Lin Hui that he could start at any time.

Hu Xin did not cut directly into the topic of the interview.

Although Lin Hui can be said to be young and promising.

But after all, he is not a professional media person.

If you rush into the main topic of the interview, you may easily lose track of the interview.

So, Hu Xin started the topic in a roundabout way.

Lin Hui seemed to understand Hu Xin's painstaking efforts.

He responded to the topics raised by Hu Xin very cooperatively.

The two parties cooperated very well and soon got to the main topic of the interview.

After getting to the point, the interview went smoothly.

Hu Xinlie's previous interview outline involved seven aspects of Lin Hui's studies, career, and family.

Originally, Hu Xin thought it would take a long time to discuss all these issues.

Unexpectedly, it only took less than two hours to complete the interview with the questions on the outline.

There may be some additional content recorded after this.

But the main interview is almost complete.

This interview with Lin Hui left a deep impression on Hu Xin.

In Hu Xin's opinion, Lin Hui was the easiest to get along with compared to the interviewers he had interacted with before.

Lin Hui's conversation was also very civilized, and his speech was clear and concise.

Moreover, Lin Hui almost never talks or writes useless nonsense in interviews.

Especially some of the interview content that Hu Xin originally thought might be overturned, Lin Hui also responded to it in a watertight manner.

Hu Xin was initially nervous when she received this interview assignment.

Because the series of brilliant achievements that Lin Hui has achieved in the past are actually not the focus of this interview.

The key is how to explain to the outside world that Lin Hui, a person who got perfect scores in the college entrance examination, chose an overseas university.

Originally, there was no need to explain this matter. After all, there is no law that stipulates that people who have passed the college entrance examination cannot study abroad.

What's more, everyone's life path choice does not need to be explained to others.

But as a media person, how could Hu Xin not know the newsiness behind this incident.

If this news is caught by some media people who like to stir up trouble and criticize the system.

At that time, the domestic media will be very passive in publicizing the same event.