When I write a bug it becomes the core gameplay

"Not really, that's too unreasonable!

"How can I think of the game like this?"

The Liver Emperor himself thinks this inference is ridiculous.

Since it is not to disgust the players deliberately, this design is very interesting.

While watching the silicon-based little man on the screen busy, the Liver Emperor seriously thought about the real purpose of the design of this mechanism in the game Against Heaven.

"Could it be that... this deep game mechanism is actually emphasizing the importance of public opinion?

"This kind of gameplay is actually the third way besides the head of state and the consul!"

The Liver Emperor reviewed his previous game experience and suddenly realized this.

Originally, "Star Plan" had only three different game modes:

The first one is that the head of state overwhelms the consul, and finally embarks on the road of the consul being a dog and the head of state being a dictator;

The second one is that the consul overwhelms the head of state, and finally embarks on the road of the consul swearing on the comet and seeking power and usurping the throne;

The third one is the standard ending played by many people, that is, the head of state and the consul compromise and cooperate with each other, and then leave the comet hand in hand.

At the beginning, everyone had the standard ending, but soon someone discovered that this game could also be played as a zero-sum game, so they fell into the internal friction of mutual calculation.

Especially after the iconic event of "swearing by the comet", it became increasingly difficult for the head of state and the consul to trust each other, and the matchmaking of passers-by was almost turned into a dark forest.

If it ends here, what is the game "Star Project"? Is it an excellent game?

I'm afraid it's worth discussing.

Because from the perspective of the entire political structure, these three endings are just a game between the head of state and the consul, or it can be said that it is similar to the plot of kings, princes, generals and ministers in ancient novels.

But what about the silicon-based villains on the comet?

They are completely unknown tools throughout the whole process, without any sense of existence.

This is obviously unreasonable.

Because these silicon-based villains are also intelligent life, they have a certain degree of subjective initiative, and they can still make trouble in the middle and late stages, not only creating various group incidents and making demands, but also really stuffing parts into the production line to cause damage.

Aren't these silicon-based villains worthy of affecting the ending of the game?

Obviously they are worthy.

These silicon-based villains are exactly the ones who are actually building the comet. If it weren't for their hard work, the miracle of the Star Plan would never have been possible.

In comparison, the archons who personally plan all the construction plans, or the heads of state who hold great power and set the plan indicators, although they will also play a very critical role in the success or failure of the Star Plan, are ultimately replaceable.

Only these silicon-based villains are truly irreplaceable.

Therefore, there is actually another line in the game, that is, the line where these silicon-based villains truly exert their subjective initiative.

That is the line that the liver emperor tried out at this time.

Or in other words, these are actually two lines:

If the head of state and the archons are both rotten, and both sides fall into meaningless and endless internal friction, then the comet will soon go to extinction, which is the "internal friction ending";

But on the other hand, if one party wakes up in this internal friction, such as the head of state does not want to be rotten anymore and wants to have fun, then it is completely possible to bypass the archons by improving public opinion to complete the Star Plan.

Thinking from this perspective, the game's purpose and freedom are elevated again!

"I understand, this is all connected!

"This hidden ending actually emphasizes the role of public opinion, that is, it emphasizes that the people are the promoters and creators of history, and are the backbone of the true completion of the "Star Plan"!

"Whether it is the head of state or the consul, no matter how smart and intelligent they are, they must rely on the masses to exert their power.

"Why does the game use the stoppage of the comet as the final settlement node?

"I think this is obviously a political metaphor!

"Every planet, every civilization, has a lifespan and a cycle.

"If the player does not give full play to the power of the masses, then once they leave the comet, they will die.

"No matter how excellent and wise the head of state and the consul are, they will eventually die.

"If the player does not choose to open up the wisdom of the people, then when the head of state and the consul leave the comet, they are actually on this old road.

"Even if on the surface, the comet civilization has reached its most prosperous period, it will only go into a meaningless cycle afterwards.

"So the game was decisively cut off, because the subsequent plot was repeated and there was no point in continuing.

"Only after fully opening up the people's wisdom, the entire comet civilization actually still has vitality. It is no longer a stage for the head of state or the archon, but a stage for all silicon-based life.

"So, whether it is the silicon-based people who stay on the comet or the silicon-based people who come to the new planet, their activities can keep this archive running forever, because every day after that is a new day!"

After the liver emperor summarized, he suddenly felt a sense of sudden enlightenment.

But soon someone raised a question.

"Ah? But opening up the people's wisdom is not 100% successful? If the archon messes up, this ending can't be achieved, right?"

Obviously, there is a very important reason why the liver emperor can achieve this ending: the original archon player chose to hang up.

If the archon has nothing to do and keeps watching, demolishing every building built by the silicon-based villains, it will be difficult to develop in the early stage.

Because although the head of state can behead the archon, there is still a process to follow. During the process, the archon has caused enough damage, thus greatly reducing the survival rate of these silicon-based villains.

The liver emperor nodded: "That's right, but it doesn't conflict with my conclusion, right?

"Although the power of public opinion is very strong and full of infinite possibilities, if there is an obvious reactionary force among the archon and the head of state, it is also possible to do bad things.

"If it is placed in human history, it is that some key historical figures made wrong decisions and left a bad reputation for thousands of years, and even led to a great chaos for hundreds of years.

"What's more, it may lead to the direct destruction of a tribe.

"So, the approach of "Star Plan" is not to emphasize the importance of public opinion unilaterally, nor does it say that victory will be achieved after the people exert their power. Instead, it can only be established after certain specific conditions are met."

Another audience asked: "Why hide it? Can't we open a separate technology tree for public opinion?"

The liver emperor explained: "This is the subtlety!

"Because the option of mobilizing public opinion was actually hidden in reality, the game is obviously a tribute!

"Think about it, in reality, in the long, thousands of years of ancient society, it's all heroic history, right? It's a fight between the emperor and the prime minister. As for the common people below, what does it count as?

"Exerting the power of the masses has never been an option that is put on the table.

"If it is made into a separate technology line in the game, it is equivalent to directly telling the players that they can play this way, then the players don't need to use their brains, right?

"On the contrary, hiding this line and cleverly splitting it into the two lines of the head of state and the executive officer can not only confuse the players, but also be more in line with reality.

"If the player, as the head of state, only improves public opinion in a limited way to restrict the consuls, and once he thinks that public opinion is too strong, he starts to control and stop clicking on the technology points of public opinion, then public opinion will not be truly awakened.

"Only by wholeheartedly improving public opinion, not regarding these silicon-based villains as troublemakers, and not regarding their behavior as troublemaking, can we truly play their role."

At the beginning, the barrage audience thought this statement was nonsense, but the more they listened, the more they felt that it seemed to make some sense?

And they all matched inexplicably?

Of course, everyone knows that the statement of the liver emperor must have an element of over-interpretation, but the premise of over-interpretation is that there must be enough coincidences between the gameplay and reality.

If there is no coincidence, where is the room for over-interpretation?

Everyone knows that the two biggest highlights of the game "Star Project" are the gameplay of traditional production line games and the simulation effect of politics.

Whether players are playing PVP intrigues or pretending to be Whether it is playing the role of the Archon using inhumane means to carry out the elderly population removal plan, it itself carries a strong political metaphor and can be mapped to reality.

This simulation effect of politics is the highlight of the game.

Of course, some people complain that the political gameplay of "Star Project" is too simple, and the head of state and the Archon are playing house intrigues.

As a result, isn't it not simple now?

It turns out that fake-AI is also a variable!

The more the liver emperor thinks about it, the more it makes sense: "In this case, the design of the "game settlement mechanism" by Anti-Heaven seems to be better than all of us originally expected!

"We just thought of using mods to extend the game time before, but that is equivalent to destroying the mechanism of the game itself from the outside.

"And Anti-Heaven's approach is obviously more natural and more meaningful!"