A treasure-appraisal maniac

When he heard Wang Xinyi say that Guan Haishan was in trouble, Lu Fei's first reaction was not to believe it.

Lao Guan is now red and purple, and he holds real power. Besides, he is not someone who takes the initiative to cause trouble at all. What trouble can he get into?

Lu Fei sat down suspiciously, took the tablet handed over by Wang Xinyi and looked at it for a few times, his brows suddenly furrowed.

The source of the information comes from China's quite authoritative mainstream official website. When it is published on this website, first of all, it must be ruled out as random fabrication.

Looking at the content again, as Wang Xinyi said, Guan Haishan is indeed in trouble. The trouble is not particularly serious, but it is quite disgusting to say it is not serious.

The video content involves two authoritative departments of China, the Academy of Sciences and the China Archaeological Headquarters.

The reason is that the Academy of Sciences released a latest research result. After eight years of hard work, they successfully developed an antique identification instrument, and claimed that this is the greatest invention for archaeological work in history, whether it is antiques, calligraphy, painting, or bronze. Porcelain can accurately identify the age and authenticity of objects. After half a year of experiments, the Academy of Sciences proudly stated that the success rate of this identification instrument can reach 100% with zero errors.

When this piece of information was announced, it immediately caused a sensation all over the world. However, only the public was shocked. Professional archaeological departments around the world expressed doubts.

In the past twenty years, there have been so many antique identification instruments developed around the world. Every time the research results are released, they are blown to the sky, but the facts have proved that the results are just like that, and they are far behind the achievements they boasted. , even Carbon 14, which is recognized as the most effective and claims to be able to determine the age of archaeological artifacts that originated within about 50,000 years, and is used to date bones, clothing, wood, plant fibers and other products related to ancient human behavior, also has Obvious loopholes will still be slapped in the face when encountering complex situations.

Therefore, archaeologists everywhere sneer at those so-called high-tech instruments. In their minds, what is reliable is rich experience and hard-earned professional knowledge.

instrument?

What is that?

Do you have experience with the instrument?

Does the instrument have an IQ?

Can the instrument connect historical provenance to the object itself?

Instruments were invented by people. Who has ever heard of the inventor of instruments?

This is not as simple as inventing a harvester or a bulldozer. The appraisal of antiques is very rigorous. The difference is a thousand miles. How can it be done by instruments that are so precise and complicated?

Therefore, when the Academy of Sciences announced the research results, it only caused a sensation among the common people, but not among the archaeological circles everywhere.

There was too much fuss, and many overseas professionals even unabashedly ridiculed the Academy of Sciences for its unabashed rhetoric and sensationalism. There were countless complaints from all over the world. In this way, the Academy of Sciences, which is complacent about its research results, He was immediately pushed to the forefront.

The Academy of Sciences was unconvinced and publicly stated that the local media who complained about their research results did not respect their research results. Zhao Jinzhou, the main developer of this instrument, even stood up and spoke directly.

"Our research results have gone through more than 15,000 experiments for half a year, including various complex situations, but our instruments have never made any mistakes.

We respect professionals from all over the world, but what I want to say is that without investigation, you have no right to speak. While you are questioning us, do you understand the principles of our instruments?

Do you know the efficiency of our instruments?

You don’t understand anything, so why should you question our research results? Are you relying on your imagination and unbridled words?

What a huge irony!

Well, since you doubt that our instruments are reliable and that we are talking big words, why don't you come and experience it for yourself? Is it because you have a guilty conscience or do you dare not?

We welcome all those who question our instruments to come to the Chinese Academy of Sciences to cause trouble. We hope you can find evidence that our instruments are unreliable. As long as you can find out, we will immediately destroy all data and publicly admit that the research failed. How? So, we are so sincere, why don't you come?

Are you feeling guilty and unsure, or are you worried about being slapped in the face by our research results? "

Okay!

When Academician Zhao Jinzhou posted this Weibo, it can be said that one stone stirred up a thousand waves, and the Internet became even more lively.

The melon-eaters, who were not afraid of the fuss and were not afraid of the fuss, started to make noises. Experts from various places who had questioned the Academy of Sciences were also dissatisfied. Even the mainstream media from all over the world joined in the fun and started to sow discord.

"Although I have doubts about this instrument studied by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Academician Zhao Jinzhou is right. Without investigation, there is no right to speak. Facts speak louder than words. If those experts want to prove your doubts, it is useless to say it with their mouths. Yes, the best way is to find out the flaws yourself!"

"I respect Academician Zhao Jinzhou's remarks. If this instrument is really as powerful as he said, there is no doubt that it will be the greatest invention in the history of world archaeology. For the world's archaeological community, its significance is no less than that of the steam engine. The contribution of inventions to mankind."

"Some experts are big talkers. They are never responsible for their speech. Academician Zhao said that he is welcome to come and make trouble. Aren't you questioning it? Then what are you waiting for?" When Wang Xinyi said that Guan Haishan was in trouble, Lu Fei's first thought was The reaction was disbelief.

Lao Guan is now red and purple, and he holds real power. Besides, he is not someone who takes the initiative to cause trouble at all. What trouble can he get into?

Lu Fei sat down suspiciously, took the tablet handed over by Wang Xinyi and looked at it for a few times, his brows suddenly furrowed.

The source of the information comes from China's quite authoritative mainstream official website. When it is published on this website, first of all, it must be ruled out as random fabrication.

Looking at the content again, as Wang Xinyi said, Guan Haishan is indeed in trouble. The trouble is not particularly serious, but it is quite disgusting to say it is not serious.

The video content involves two authoritative departments of China, the Academy of Sciences and the China Archaeological Headquarters.

The reason is that the Academy of Sciences released a latest research result. After eight years of hard work, they successfully developed an antique identification instrument, and claimed that this is the greatest invention for archaeological work in history, whether it is antiques, calligraphy, painting, or bronze. Porcelain can accurately identify the age and authenticity of objects. After half a year of experiments, the Academy of Sciences proudly stated that the success rate of this identification instrument can reach 100% with zero errors.

When this piece of information was announced, it immediately caused a sensation all over the world. However, only the public was shocked. Professional archaeological departments around the world expressed doubts.

In the past twenty years, there have been so many antique identification instruments developed around the world. Every time the research results are released, they are blown to the sky, but the facts have proved that the results are just like that, and they are far behind the achievements they boasted. , even Carbon 14, which is recognized as the most effective and claims to be able to determine the age of archaeological artifacts that originated within about 50,000 years, and is used to date bones, clothing, wood, plant fibers and other products related to ancient human behavior, also has Obvious loopholes will still be slapped in the face when encountering complex situations.

Therefore, archaeologists everywhere sneer at those so-called high-tech instruments. In their minds, what is reliable is rich experience and hard-earned professional knowledge.

instrument?

What is that?

Do you have experience with the instrument?

Does the instrument have an IQ?

Can the instrument connect historical provenance to the object itself?

Instruments were invented by people. Who has ever heard of the inventor of instruments?

This is not as simple as inventing a harvester or a bulldozer. The appraisal of antiques is very rigorous. The difference is a thousand miles. How can it be done by instruments that are so precise and complicated?

Therefore, when the Academy of Sciences announced the research results, it only caused a sensation among the common people, but not among the archaeological circles everywhere.

There was too much fuss, and many overseas professionals even unabashedly ridiculed the Academy of Sciences for its unabashed rhetoric and sensationalism. There were countless messages of complaints from all over the world. In this way, the Academy of Sciences, which is complacent about its research results, He was immediately pushed to the forefront.

The Academy of Sciences was unconvinced and publicly stated that the local media who complained about their research results did not respect their research results. Zhao Jinzhou, the main developer of this instrument, even stood up and spoke directly.

"Our research results have gone through more than 15,000 experiments for half a year, including various complex situations, but our instruments have never made any mistakes.

We respect professionals from all over the world, but what I want to say is that without investigation, you have no right to speak. While you are questioning us, do you understand the principles of our instruments?

Do you know the efficiency of our instruments?

You don’t understand anything, so why should you question our research results? Are you relying on your imagination and unbridled words?

What a huge irony!

Well, since you doubt that our instruments are reliable and that we are talking big words, why don't you come and experience it for yourself? Is it because you have a guilty conscience or do you dare not?

We welcome all those who question our instruments to come to the Chinese Academy of Sciences to cause trouble. We hope you can find evidence that our instruments are unreliable. As long as you can find out, we will immediately destroy all data and publicly admit that the research failed. How? So, we are so sincere, why don't you come?

Are you feeling guilty and unsure, or are you worried about being slapped in the face by our research results? "

Okay!

When Academician Zhao Jinzhou posted this Weibo, it can be said that one stone stirred up a thousand waves, and the Internet became even more lively.

The melon-eaters, who were not afraid of the fuss and were not afraid of the fuss, started to make noises. Experts from various places who had questioned the Academy of Sciences were also dissatisfied. Even the mainstream media from all over the world joined in the fun and started to sow discord.

"Although I have doubts about this instrument studied by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Academician Zhao Jinzhou is right. Without investigation, there is no right to speak. Facts speak louder than words. If those experts want to prove your doubts, it is useless to say it with their mouths. Yes, the best way is to find out the flaws yourself!"

"I respect Academician Zhao Jinzhou's remarks. If this instrument is really as powerful as he said, there is no doubt that it will be the greatest invention in the history of world archaeology. For the world's archaeological community, its significance is no less than that of the steam engine. The contribution of inventions to mankind."

"Some experts are big talkers, and they are never responsible for their speech. Academician Zhao said that he is welcome to come and make trouble. Aren't you questioning it? Then what are you waiting for?"