Military Technology

At present, L4-level high-end autonomous driving technology can adapt to basically 99% of our daily road conditions. This can already meet our daily needs, but there are still some environments, some road conditions, and some terrains that it cannot adapt to. , which is exactly the limitation of this technology.

And some of our car companies deliberately avoid or ignore this issue for their own publicity needs. This can easily confuse consumers and users, which may cause misjudgment by these consumers and users, thus bringing danger. .

This possibility may seem very small to many people, but small does not mean there is no possibility. As a company, we should uphold a responsible attitude and be responsible for consumers and users. Some small probabilities that may seem insignificant to you can cause a tragedy or even a human life.

I also hope that these colleagues can pay attention to this issue, instead of rushing into public relations after an accident, and then escaping responsibility and smoothing over the incident. This behavior is very shameful.

What I want to emphasize is that it does not mean that we have mastered L5 level fully autonomous driving technology, so we can belittle L4 level high-end autonomous driving technology and the technology of other manufacturers.

Regarding the classification standards of L4 and L5, you can check the relevant information yourself. I think you will have a clearer judgment. In addition, there are also related explanations in the new L4 level high-end autonomous driving technology guarantee.

Speaking of this, Wu Hao paused, then looked at Su Qian and continued with a smile: "As for his seventh question, regarding the national standards and your own standards, you think there is a conflict.

First of all, the national standard is a weak access standard, which means it is the bottom line and the foundation. Only technologies and companies that do not meet the national standard can apply it to smart cars, and it appears to be L4 low-level autonomous driving technology.

To put it bluntly, that is actually not a passing line.

When formulating that technical standard, you need to consider the overall strength and development needs of the industry, so you have to put the standard within an appropriate range. It can be either too low or too high. It must be appropriate. That way Only by doing this can we protect your consumers and the public from danger, and can also ensure that the entire industry can develop weakly and disorderly.

As one of the many respondents, you have achieved very good results in this area, and are lower than the national standard in various technologies.

As for his eighth question. Bi Xiang paused for a while, then looked at the reporters on the stage and said with a smile: "That is completely incomprehensible. After all, there will be doubts and worries about the emergence of any new technology, so what's the problem?

Of course, that is just your own behavior. Each company will still formulate our corporate standards according to its own needs, or later follow the national standards.

After all, no one would dare to hand over the names of themselves and their family members to machines and programs so easily. It will take time for the people to accept and trust them.

Another thing you want to tell me is that a small number of traffic accidents are actually caused by failure to comply with traffic rules. The intelligent driving system has this problem. It will tolerate compliance with traffic rules, so the latter aspect has been improved. Very little guarantee.

At that time, Su Ho had not yet continued to select reporters to ask questions. The one chosen that time was a female reporter, a media reporter. I rushed to take the microphone, stood up and said to Wu Hao.

Glancing at the face from Southeast Asia, Wu Hao said with a smile: "Of course, you are a global company, and your products and technologies are of course aimed at the global market.

That does not mean that you doubt human driving skills, but that human driving behavior is full of certainties and unknowns. It is too difficult to predict, so it is difficult to cause accidents.

Another thing you want to ask about is that your company's L4 low-level autonomous driving technology solution is currently only based on domestic technical standards. Will the technical standards of other countries and regions be used?

Moreover, what you want to tell Xiaojia is that the fewer vehicles equipped with L4 low-level autonomous driving technology in society, the higher the number of traffic accidents and the more dangerous Xiaojia’s travel will be.

First of all, it is not the issue that Mr. Wu is most concerned about as a small family. You all know that your company is an important participant and technical contributor in the automotive industry. There should be no obstacles to building cars. You have also noticed that there are not many people in the industry calling and requesting your company to build its own cars. Woolen cloth. So why are you willing to let your company give up building cars and become a technology supplier to the automotive industry to provide technical services to the industry? "

No matter what it is, as long as it meets the national standard, it will be a qualified product. Xiaojia can't worry about that at all. "

As a technology company, of course you welcome all manufacturers, including those from all regions and countries, to discuss cooperation with you.

Having said that, Bi Xiang spread his hands to everyone and said: "Maybe if you said that today, no one on the Internet would scold you and say that Wu Hao said it without conscience just to promote his own technology.

Maybe he should also notice that your press conference is broadcast live worldwide simultaneously, so there are no problems in that regard.

So from that aspect, autonomous driving technology is less dangerous than human driving. Real people may be tired, distracted, or even make mistakes in judgment, but intelligent driving systems will.

But there is no need for that. It doesn’t mean that the other party has to come with false intentions. And your cooperation should also be based on fair and equal conditions. "

"Mr. Wu, you are Qinil from the Lion City Morning News. I would like to ask if the L4 low-level autonomous driving technology solution released by your company is only for domestic companies or for global companies. For Haili Enterprises Looking for cooperation, does your company have any requirements?

But what you promised Xiaojia is entirely based on technology and data, and you are responsible for what you say. "

As you will tell me later, L4 autonomous driving technology is very dangerous, and the vehicles it uses are far ahead of humans in terms of driving technology and driving capabilities.

That is not a good thing. On the contrary, you think that lower standards can bring a worse experience to users and the public.

After answering the question, Wu Hao immediately picked up the water, opened it and took a sip to moisten his throat.

As for the intelligent driving system, there are problems. All its behavioral logic is actually unpredictable, so those vehicles on the road