Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

Germany.

North Rhine-Westphalia.

The conference room of the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics, filled with people at the round conference table, looked a little crowded.

Sitting at the conference table and observing the expressions of several other participants, Faltins's heart was full of complex emotions.

He never thought about it before.

The seminar inside the Bourbaki School, which was held to solve the great unification theory, finally turned into a "reviewing conference" that set the conclusion for this proposition...

There seems to be a kind of God in the midst of it, as if from the beginning, it was doomed that his expectations would not be as expected.

What made him happy and worried, after all, happened...

Many scholars sitting at the conference table were silent.

On the one hand, it’s because the surprise has taken up all the thinking, on the other hand, because it’s because I’m surprised, I don’t know what to say...

Even if you want to express your opinion on this matter, you have to wait until you have finished reading the paper.

It is precisely because of this that from yesterday to today, the mainstream voices that truly control the voice of the mathematics community are quite silent. So far, no well-known scholar has published a professional opinion on this matter.

"It turned out to be."

The first to break the silence in the conference room is Professor Fefferman.

Looking at the paper in his hand, his eyes became a crescent-like gap, and the applause from the crow's feet was like looking at this exquisite piece of art.

“The deeper and more complex the truth, the more minimalist expressions are expressed, and the motive we study, as we expected, is the common source of all good cohomology.”

"These wonderful qualities remind me of the metaphor of Plato's cave. Can these properties all come from the same thing? Is it the realization of the same abstraction at different levels? Just like the number and shape of the direct source of the universe. In the abstract sense, they are actually the same thing. The only difference is the angle we look at the problem."

"...is really wonderful."

As for why Professor Fefferman, who is not a Bourbaki school, appears here, it is a long story.

Originally he was attending an academic conference in the field of partial differential equations in Paris, and he suddenly learned of this amazing thing.

After a brief exchange with Professor Delini by mail, he learned that the “Public Review Committee” lacked an expert in the field of partial differentiation and immediately rushed from Paris.

He has already read the paper in half by the way.

Now, he finally finished reading the remaining half.

Notice that everyone looked up and looked at himself. He placed the paper in his hand on the table and shrugged his shoulders.

"Absolutely... I have already read this paper, there is no big problem."

"You don't just look at me, I am sure it's not just that I have read it myself... talk about my own opinion."

Professor Delini and Professor Sanak looked at each other and said after a while of silence.

"It's still for you. He used to be my student after all. I don't have a convenient conclusion."

"So you plan to kick the ball to me?" With a helpless expression, Professor Sanak sighed and took off the glasses on his nose.

"For this major proposition, even if I have no way to give an evaluation immediately, maybe some words should wait until I have read it several times, but since you have asked this question..."

After a moment of pause, he cleared his throat and put on a serious tone.

"To be honest, I was shocked."

"Not only his own understanding of the Langlands program and motive theory, but also his application of various mathematical tools in various fields... I didn't expect this age, there is still a chance to make me so open-minded."

"For the time being, I don't comment on whether his argumentation process is complete, but the value of the mathematical methods and frameworks he put forward throughout the paper may have surpassed all the achievements we have made in the field of algebraic geometry since the 20th century."

“It’s more like a book than a paper. Since ega, we have a new Bible... No, it’s probably greater, the Bible tells us what we should believe, and it’s like an epic, connected Past and future."

When Professor Sanak said this, almost everyone in front of the conference table cast a surprised look at him.

Especially Professor Delini, for a time, he was surprised to say nothing.

Compared to other people, he has been working with the Princeton Institute of Advanced Studies for many hours and is very familiar with the old man.

Although it seems easygoing, there are very few people who can get a positive evaluation from this guy.

And obviously, this is not just a positive evaluation.

Professor Faltins opened his mouth and said it after a while.

"Is it beautiful? It will be a bit too exaggerated."

Ega, Grothendieck's Algebraic Geometry Foundation.

Although the name sounds like a college textbook or handout, it is actually the cornerstone of modern algebraic geometry, and is regarded as a Bible by scholars engaged in research in this field.

In any case, it would be a bit exaggerated to compare this paper, which is still uncertain about the problem, to the greatest achievement of Professor Grothendieck.

At least Faltins thinks so.

Professor Sanak shook his head and said: "It is no exaggeration at all. My statement is very conservative. In fact, what I want to express is that its influence on the future should even be in Euclidean's "Geometry Original". It’s at least equal. It’s too early to discuss these things now, wait and see, some people will witness my predictions in the future.”

At the conference table, the voice of the mouth was gradually spread.

Some people agree with Professor Sanak's point of view, while others think it is too exaggerated.

The only thing that is not controversial is that Lu Zhou did an earth-shattering event.

Regardless of the retrospective history, can you find a scholar whose merits can be compared with him? This paper is destined to become a watershed in the mathematics world. Before it was born, it was a world, and after it was born, it was another world. .

"This paper..." Looking at the print in his hand, Schultz said in a complicated way, "I can't make a conclusion immediately, I might have to wait until I go back and study it. Besides..."

After a pause, he complained.

"Does this major mathematical proposition be too informal on arxiv? How do you need a report?"

"I agree with your point of view," Professor Delini, who was very silent throughout the process, nodded. "I will send an email to him later, and I will give you some suggestions."

"It seems that I have to fly to Jinling again."

Looking at the watch, Professor Fefferman muttered a sentence.

"I knew that I would buy the ticket for Jinling directly, and I will come here to do something."

Faltins: "..."

Schultz: "..."

De Ligne: "..."

Wonder House