The Director of Music Department

Eight hundred and seventy-two. Controversial comments

At the end of the premiere of "Dear", almost everyone at the scene had red eyes.

Rather than saying "Dear" is an anti-abduction film, it is better to say that "Dear" is a film that focuses on family affection.

Whether it's Tian Wenjun, Lu Xiaojuan, or Li Hongqin, what they show is the kind of love they have for children.

After watching it, many audiences at the scene can be said to have suffered a kind of baptism.

Family love has always been the easiest to move people.

In fact, Wu Tianxiong was also under a lot of pressure.

On the one hand, it is the pressure from public opinion. It is actually very difficult to produce anything new with a sensitive subject like "Dear".

The reason why Wu Tianxiong took this film is actually because "Dear" jumped out of the sensitive topic of simply fighting abductions, and extended the theme of the film to another level.

Fortunately, at the premiere, the audience's response was quite good.

The film schedule of "Dear" is not very high. In fact, the expectation for this film has never been the box office.

 …

Netizen's book case: "The story of finding a child is just a big background, and the psychological transformation of each character in the story is the biggest drama. Maternal love has no blood relationship, and legal principles are hard to judge human feelings. The solid script and Director Chen's skill in seeing the big from the small, This film is far more than simply touching, and the performances of a group of powerful young actors from the mainland are also amazing. The final true story prototype is the tearjerker!"

Netizen Xu Xu Rusheng: "Crying from the beginning to the end. Thank you dear parents for not losing me, and I will definitely not lose myself."

Netizen Tao Tao Linlin: "The level of tear-jerking is quite high, the whole film is full of tear-points, especially the first half. The director knows how to catch people's soft spots and hit you at critical moments. This is a very tear-jerking movie, But it’s just a very tear-jerking movie. Just like the absent human trafficker, the film hides all key elements and fills them with warmth. Especially the separation before and after, and the excessive humanistic care.”

Netizen Sanmi: "Watching this movie, I was moved by countless scenes, and I couldn't help but cry without deliberately sensationalizing. The ending the director gave Li Hongqin was too cruel, and I couldn't bear to think about it anymore. She cried, "Don't feed it to the children." Tao, he will be allergic to "the kind and great mother, there are thousands of ways to leave home, but there is only one way to go home. I hope we are all on that only way. It's a super good movie!"

The ratings of "Dear" on the audio-visual website are not high. Compared with the one-sided praise of "I'm Not the God of Medicine", "Dear" has mixed reviews.

Score 8.1 points!

Such a score, on the first day, is actually not high.

However, what's interesting is that there are quite a lot of comments on "Dear", whether they are positive or negative.

The ratio of the number of ratings to the number of comments is actually lower than 10:1!

This speaks to the reliability of Dear's rating!

Many movies, in fact, many people who rate them vote with their feet, and many people have not even watched the movie.

But "Dear" is obviously not the case. The ratio of the number of people who rated it to the number of people who commented is not so high. This also shows that many people came to comment on this movie after watching it.

And many viewers are very invested in the characters in the film.

For example: "The filming is pretty good, the acting skills are very hard, and it also allows me to understand this group of people better. The most touching thing for me is the "encouragement! encourage! Encourage, encourage, encourage! "In that part, I used self-anesthesia to pour my obsession deeply into my fragile will. I also wish that after the movie is released, Mr. Han's prototype can find his own child."

For example: "I really felt very depressed after reading it. My son who was so close in the past, finally got along with him like a stranger. It's really helpless!"

For example: "The ending of Li Hongqin, the wife of a trafficker, was cruel! The director didn't tell whether Li Hongqin really didn't know that her husband was a trafficker, which made this role more complicated."

Another example: "When Han Dezhong sang Qin opera, I burst into tears. He expressed the powerlessness of the biological father who loved his child deeply after losing the child, very deeply. But he is a big man, He can't cry all day long, and his wife needs support and comfort, so he can only focus on Qin Opera. That kind of resentment, that kind of self-blame spreads to everyone with the singing. But as a wife, he has listened to it countless times. Those who are moved have already been moved, and those who should cry have already cried. The child is naturally unaccounted for, so she left in annoyance, which hit Han Dezhong even more. Mr. Han is the saddest one in the whole film!"

For some movies, many people may praise the plot or the special effects.

But in "Dear", many people focus on the characters in the movie.

Li Hongqin, Tian Wenjun, Lu Xiaojuan, Han Dezhong, etc., even assumed their identities.

The participation of the audience in "Dear" is very high, or the sense of substitution is very strong.

This is indeed a good thing, but in terms of film critics and the media, the evaluation of this film is also polarized!

Although there are more positive reviews than negative reviews, it also shows that movies with sensitive subjects are really difficult to make!

Film critic Zhang Hong gave "Dear" one star!

"After watching this movie, I have a few doubts. Because of these doubts, I can only give one point, and if there are negative points, I will give negative points, because this is related to the bottom line of human nature.

First, Tian Peng can clearly talk to adults in the film. The child does not know the kidnapper, but knows the situation of his parents. If such a child is kidnapped, doesn’t the kidnapper’s wife know that he was kidnapped? In addition, is it possible for this child to completely forget his biological parents in such a short period of time? In the real photos below, the boy and his biological father are smiling brightly, and there is obviously no estrangement. Therefore, just judging from the setting of the movie, it is very blunt to say that Li Hongqin is ignorant.

Second, it is difficult to prove that Ji Fang was not abducted. A co-worker who has a good relationship with the kidnapper saw it? The problem is what exactly the worker saw. No real footage was shown, and it is very possible that Jifang was kidnapped and placed on the construction site to create the illusion of an abandoned baby. All of Li Hongqin's moral support is that Ji Fang is abandoned, but this bottom line is very vague in the movie. Her man is dead, without any strong logical support, and there is no straightforward expression. If there is a possibility of Jifang being abducted, then this movie has failed to keep the basic moral bottom line.

No money to read novels? Send you cash or coins, and you can receive it within a limited time of 1 day! Follow the public account [Book Friends Base Camp], get it for free!

As the movie says: child abduction is one of the most inhumane crimes. Please don’t set up a whitewashing plot that is full of loopholes. Filmmakers in Huaguo just like to use vague bureaucratic accents, and it’s the same when it comes to right and wrong. Anyway, if I don’t make it clear, I have no responsibility. I’m afraid of taking responsibility and making socially responsible films Movie? What the movie does is tantamount to pushing all the moral burden on the audience, allowing the audience to identify themselves under unclear conditions. Of course, this identification is strongly induced by the movie.

The same is true for Tian Peng, as long as the movie takes a few minutes, no matter at what time, explain Tian Peng's first arrival at Li Hongqin's house, explain how the kidnapper was deceived, and explain why Li Hongqin can trust such a big child , children who don’t know her and his husband at all, and children who have memories of their own family, were born by his husband and other women. Ethical issues can naturally be ruled out. Why not, I don't think the crew can identify the real situation, right?

As for the fact that the child forgets his biological parents after two years in the kidnapper's house, is he just bullying the child for being ignorant? Children aged 3 or 4 have completely forgotten their biological parents in two years. It can only be said that it is necessary for the plot. "

The genius remembers the address of this site in one second:. Mobile version reading website:

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like