The Greatest Showman

Remember in one second [End of the God Station] Mobile phone user input address: m.xinwanben.com

.,

Hollywood's major interest groups are panicking Renly's sweeping army? So that there are behind-the-scenes actors in the industry sniping at Renly's rise and strength, or are they interfering with Renly's career curve?

This sounds like a fantasy: which of those behemoths with Wall Street capital is not a giant across the world, how could they be in chaos because of an independent individual? How is it possible to change strategy because of an actor? It's absolutely impossible even in fantasy novels, more like a conspiracy theory conceived in the daydream of a complete layman, and a ridiculous kind.

But calm down and think about it: When Steve Jobs conceived the iPhone, no one expected him to change the course of the entire world; when Mark Zuckerberg was programming Facebook in his Harvard dorm room, no one expected him. It is expected that he can change the composition of life in the Internet age.

History makes heroes, and heroes are often developed from "independent individuals".

With Renly alone, he really can't shake the monsters of Wall Street capital, but when Renly owns Sisyphus Pictures, that's another story.

The "New Yorker" article starts from the far-reaching influence of three aspects, expounding the "panic" from Hollywood:

The first is the related interests of superhero movies. Now both DC and Marvel are thinking about whether they should cooperate with Renly. Disney took the first step and successfully persuaded Renly to join the Star Wars universe. Li's move to join "Jurassic World" also means that the profit model of commercial films may change.

Long before Renly, the huge influence of Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr. has given people a glimpse of the change in the movie's profit model, which is also the reason for "The Fall of the Superstar"; now, Renly can pry If Renly and Mangai Films cooperate with each other, the follow-up influence will be far beyond imagination, and all major film companies must face up to it.

The second is the production and distribution model of art films, starting from the live broadcast of lectures at the Sundance Film Festival, to the frequent actions of Sisyphus Films in the past few months, to independent films such as the Coen Brothers and Robert Redford. The eagerness of the field giants, and finally the beginning of the folk music festival began to sprout, all of which prove that the emergence of Renly is becoming a variable in the independent art industry, which is also completely new to Hollywood.

Off topic, from Weinstein Pictures to Summit Entertainment to Lionsgate Pictures, including the previous DreamWorks, although they all started as independent film companies, and then gradually grew into giant crocodiles and began to change the rules of the industry, but In the final analysis, their business model has always put interests first - in line with the laws of the market, which also means that they have not jumped out of the frame after all.

Now Sisyphus Films has shown a different model, which is somewhat similar to the three major European film festivals. Interest is still the criterion of consideration, but art occupies a larger proportion. This may also be a game-changing turning point. It is a serious challenge to industry rules.

Of course, Sisyphus Pictures can't talk about "success" for the time being. How much shock this challenge will bring, everything is unknown.

Finally, there are changes in the business model of Sisyphus Pictures, including Renly's cooperation with the Berlin Film Festival, Venice Film Festival, Sundance Film Festival, including Sisyphus Pictures' acquisition of crack, including the two-pronged approach of film and television. , all of which revealed something unusual, as if a storm was brewing.

The author of the article put forward a point in the summary stage: Although it is still impossible to see the blueprint of Sisyphus Films, no one knows what they are planning. It seems that Renly has been at the forefront of the times, and industry insiders cannot see through it. His actions; but all the clues are revealing a change that is about to come, plus Renly's "invincible halo" so far, which also makes the action of Sisyphus Pictures more lethal ——

Hollywood doesn't worry about a Renly, but they have to worry about a Renly with capital.

If Sisyphus Pictures really rises, the industry grid will be broken, just like Steve Jobs' Apple and Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook, they are all elusive variables. This is also the fundamental reason why Hollywood is always "fearful" of Renly. In the final analysis, it is still worried about interests.

This also goes back to the end point of the whole article: whose cheese Renly moved, which made Renly have to face the dilemma of being attacked by enemies all the time in Hollywood.

Last year, "Gravity" and "Drunken Country Ballads" were the best of the decade, and even Matthew McConaughey's excellence was eclipsed by Renly, who was not only not a favorite, but even The nomination stage almost fell behind, which simply fell below the glasses of all onlookers.

This year, "Interstellar" and "Booming Drummer" joined forces, one business and one art. In the two works, Renly gave amazing performances, and the performance of "Booming Drummer" was even rated as one of ten One of the best alternate performances of the year, rivaling Daniel Day-Lewis' goofy performance in "There Will Be Blood", but the momentum was just picking up, and before it even spread, the negative rumors appeared.

So, whose cheese did Renly move in order to have to face embattlement?

This article from The New Yorker is very clever and very cunning, subtly swapping concepts and diverting goals to a different

From the perspective of interpreting the development trend of Hollywood in recent years - of course, some key information is also concealed, but the context of the entire article is very clear, taking Renly as a standpoint to examine the changes in the entire industry, and finally returning to Renly to discuss Renly's current situation in Hollywood.

The whole article is clear in thinking and sharp in writing. It is not only convincing, but also shocking and impactful. It connects all the focuses and hotspots in recent years, and then puts it in the context of the "bursting drummer" point-boom boom. There was an uproar on the social network:

You see, Renly's voice has only just started after the screening of "Breaking Drummer", and then there is a wind-driven public opinion in the Hollywood industry and on social networks. Isn't this the best proof against Renly? Almost every detail is echoing the New Yorker article.

No wonder Renly's every appearance is accompanied by negative news, no wonder Renly's every move is put under the microscope, no wonder Renly's life is always surrounded by the spotlight... It seems that all questions have finally been answered, so that netizens Forgot, just a few days ago, the second "hype door" was just around the corner under their own urging; now netizens easily put all the blame on... Wall Street.

Everybody hates Wall Street, doesn't they?

So, does anyone really want to snipe Renly right now? Doesn't Renly deserve a second Oscar? Last year, the double insurance of "Gravity" and "Drunken Country Ballads" could be in trouble, so it is very likely that "Boom Drummer" will be ignored again when "Interstellar Crossing" lacks competitiveness this year, isn't it?

Then, the question arises: If Renly is truly the enemy of the people, is "Boom Drummer" worthy of being the key to breaking things? In layman's terms, is "Boom Drummer" worthy of an Oscar?

Netizens exploded immediately, and the entire social network began to discuss: Does Renly deserve two Oscars? Especially when "Crazy Love" reached the top only three years ago, should Renly, who is only 25 years old, beat countless other excellent actors for two Oscars?

There are opponents, supporters, and watchers, but it is certain that after all the arguments, one point of conclusion remains the same:

You can only prove it if you have actually watched the movie with your own eyes.

After all, without experience, you have no right to speak. Only by appreciating the movie and making your own judgment can you support your opinion with actual evidence. Therefore, all eyes are focused on the "Boom Drummer". The already extremely popular movie-watching crowd has climbed a new level again, and "Booming Drummer" has reproduced the grand occasion that last year's "Drunken Country Ballad" was hard to get a ticket, or even more.

Even the Sony Classic was caught off guard.

Although the whole of Hollywood is well aware of Renly's strong appeal, every time a movie is released, it will inevitably lead to a topic. As for how much the topic can be converted into at the box office, that is another matter; but the actual situation of each time can be unexpected. Anticipate, break people's fixed perceptions, and then work miracles again and again.

Not long ago, the single-hall box office of "Super Marines" achieved brilliant, and now, "Boom Drummer" has unexpectedly become the national focus of December, which is really incredible - Sony Classics They didn't plan to do so at all, they were planning to show it step by step, and the current situation made their faces full of astonishment.

"Is there anything else that can stop Renly Hall?" This should be the most empathetic topic on the entire Internet.

This was undoubtedly a blow to Harvey Weinstein. He managed to steer the wind of public opinion in the direction he expected. As a result, the "New Yorker" article appeared before he died, and it was cut off just right. His actions - if Harvey hadn't determined that his abacus was not exposed in advance, and there were no related rumors in the industry, he almost thought that the "New Yorker" was deliberately targeting him.

Wait, is Bob Weinstein targeting himself? Brother internal demolition?

Support (end this site) and share this site with those who need it! Can't find the book, please leave a message!