Red Heart Survey

In fact, I was ready to be scolded yesterday.

Because everyone has their own moral concepts, reading comprehension. The part involving moral choices is bound to be controversial.

On the one hand, there will be readers who sympathize with Fang Heling, and will think whether Jiang Wang is too arrogant. (Probably similar to...haven't you killed anyone, why are you pretending?)

On the one hand, there will be readers who hate Fang Heling, and will question why Jiang Wang finally gave the opportunity to kill Zhang Linchuan together. (probably similar to...washed white?)

Such doubts are bound to arise.

I tried my best to pluck out my hair, trying to grasp a balance, but there was a torrent on both sides, how could it be possible not to get wet at all?

So I deleted it several times, not sure if I should write it or not. (I can give myself a day off if I have this time. I can’t remember when the last time I took a break...)

The reason why I still write like this is to do this kind of work that may be thankless. It's just because at this moment, Wang Changji, Fang Heling, Jiang Wang must meet, and there must be a collision of ideas.

To write a story is to write about people.

Compared with ambiguity and vagueness, no one can be offended, I think it is a more responsible writing attitude to ask others and yourself directly.

It's the best presentation I can think of.

I dedicate my "best" to you.

It must also be admitted that it first satisfies my own pursuit of stories.

Thank you all for your tolerance.

Thanks to the readers who have always supported me, allowing me to be a little willful, write the stories I want to write, and say what I want to say.

At the same time, what I want to say is that since I have thought of the controversy before writing it, and I decided to write it this way, then the controversy is something I should face.

I just hope that the questioning readers will not directly scold the author or scold the book, after all, whether the work is intentional or not can be read. After all, Fang Heling is just one of many characters in this world.

Everyone can question, and it is right to question.

As long as there is no personal attack, question innocence.

I hope that readers who enjoy this chapter will not overreact.

Everyone has their own understanding and ideas, and collisions are normal.

When we eat tofu nao, we have to distinguish between salty and sweet, let alone other things?

It is a kind of dignity to maintain one's own restraint and express one's views within an appropriate range.

The reason why I don't talk about these in this chapter is to open a single chapter.

Because this kind of discussion can spread to many platforms.

I have seen it in the starting point book review area, and I can also make appropriate regulations, but I can't see it elsewhere.

I can only say it together here.

Very, very much do not want sincere readers to quarrel or even abuse each other.

Debate is fun.

Invective is out of place.

I often read this chapter and appreciate the collision of different ideas from thousands of readers.

Also often frowns because of personal attacks.

Getting together is fate, coming and going is a choice, please be decent.

Because I still need to write an update, this essay is written sloppily, there may be omissions and differences, please forgive me.

I hope everyone receives my "hope".

Again--

"Reading is a happy thing, don't let yourself be unhappy."

——What is the love, written in the morning of the 24th.